Bonnie Blue has had her baby

[greglet]

And she’s already back on social media. Poor baby.

She may or may not have had a baby.. although thought she had fertility issues that she’s publicly discussed? However that is definitely not a real baby in that picture absolutely no way.

I think everything she does is a hoax / publicity stunt.

I don’t believe for a second she has had a baby, and I have never believed she was really pregnant. If the baby in the picture is a real baby and the photo is not AI, then I doubt it is hers. I think the entire thing is/was a rage baiting publicity stunt which has worked a charm because it gets such a great reaction from everyone. I can’t imagine that she has any interest in having children. IMO she is best ignored.

Well she's an Andrew Tate fan and a fan of girls being strangled during sex, so perhaps she's a fan of paedophiles too. And no, that's not a stretch at all, she herself likes boys who are "barely legal"

She's a thing, she hates women, I hope you're right and the baby doesn't exist.

Where did I say she would or wouldnt be a good parent?

You simply dont seem to understand the thresholds for significant harm.

Not now maybe, but can you imagine the shame when that child grows up and finds out what his/her mother did...

I think she would make any comment or claim to get public reaction. Sexualising pregnancy (which she has done) is one step away from pedophilia anyway for me. She doesn’t give a fuck, it’s all for attention and the reaction. She’s openly said so

But everything she’s posted that is pregnancy and baby related is absolutely easy to fake and still look convincing. I’m certain the entire thing has been a hoax and there was never a baby. I’d have to be physically in the room with her watching a baby coming out of her to believe any of it was real.

Bloody hell, is this the level of understanding of biology that gets you through a GCSE these days? What the fuck is going on with our educational system that people believe vaginas are like old hair bands?

Oh, I do hope you're right. There is not a single normal feeling or behaviour in that woman, she'd be horrifically toxic to any child to spend any amount of time around, and that's putting aside the very real threat of the child being trafficked.

She's certainly capable of any amount of lies for attention, so I do hope you're right.

It’s a joke!

It's misogyny hiding as a joke.

I really hope she’s made it all up for attention and money. That would be so much better than the difficult life that child will have as soon as they discover what she has done before, during and after pregnancy, and when anyone discovers who their mother is.

What’s more concerning is her apparent lack of interest in protecting her unborn child from any involvement in her activities. I sincerely hope that someone will be monitoring the child’s welfare going forwards.

The men who have been queuing up to be involved in her activities are disgusting. Utterly disgusting.

Imagine when his/her classmates find out.

Really? Explain it to me then. What’s funny about it?

Am I supposed to laugh at that poster pretending to be as thick as pig shit? Or am I supposed to laugh because women aren’t supposed to have sex outside of a monogamous relationship and doing so makes them a whore?

We’ll see but I think the moral outrage and concern for the baby gives her exactly the reaction she wants. She wants to be transgressive and cross boundaries and get people talking. She actively goads people and revels in having haters because it gives her traffic and ultimately she cashes in from it. And nothing quite winds people up like a ‘bad mother’ storyline.
A real life baby would actually get in the way of the lifestyle and career she enjoys and she’d be stuck with it for 18+ years. I just can’t see motherhood being something she genuinely is interested in. She’s only mid 20s isn’t she? She does look much older but I remember reading she’s only about 26. The whole thing stinks of horse shit IMO.

Christ, I thought she was about 35, going by a photo that popped up when I went looking for the independent article.

Tbh I had only heard about the baby today, right here on this thread. I avoid her because she makes me feel dirty and degraded just reading about her, I learned all I needed to know with the 1000 man gang bang and the Independent article I looked at a while back.

This thread prompted further investigation, only because - of course - there are women who pretend she's not necessarily an unfit mother because they have no standards and will simply not allow anybody else to have any without a constant struggle. And so I knew I'd have to have actual quotes to counteract the "Yeah but I mean who is she really harming?" crew.

You do have to wonder what kind of life the kid will have, particularly at school. No doubt he’ll go to private school but I can’t imagine the cliquey private school mums allowing BB into the fold. Or being overjoyed with their kids having much to do with hers. And then when the kid’s peers are old enough to be aware themselves of who BB is/was…the poor child.

the misogyny on this thread is fucking shocking. it actually blows my mind that (presumably) grown women are calling her a ‘slag’ and making fun of her ‘loose’ vagina. it’s like reading posts from moronic teenage boys on reddit. grow tf up

I'd never heard of her. Just had a Google, then wished I hadn't. Poor child, if this is even real.

Or am I supposed to laugh because women aren’t supposed to have sex outside of a monogamous relationship and doing so makes them a whore?

Well...
WHORE Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
<a class="break-all" href="http://www.merriam-webster.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › whore
whore
ˈhȯr
noun
plural whores
a person who engages in sexual intercourse for pay : prostitute
a promiscuous or immoral woman

Either definition would seem to rather suit the particular individual who is the subject of the thread.

The point is not that women "aren't supposed to". Women can do what they like. But can't really be prissy about people thinking they are "a whore" if they literally meet the dictionary definition(s) of the word.
I would say the same if you objected to a man being called a gigolo, lothario fuck boi etc if the person was indeed willingly undertaking the role thereof.

Yes I thought the same re her age. But actually she is quite young.

I agree it prompts an interesting discussion and whilst I wouldn’t say a woman like her was making great choices that were in her child’s best interests, people on here are correct that it probably wouldn’t meet threshold for children’s safeguarding provided the child was being well cared for and kept safe. Obviously the long term moral implications and effect Bonnie Blue in particular’s notoriety would have on her children’s emotional wellbeing is questionable, but truthfully it wouldn’t necessarily warrant any SS involvement. Nothing she’s actually done (to my knowledge) has broken the law.

In my career I’ve worked with mothers who are sex workers. They are often reported to SS when their line of work is discovered, but again if the child is being cared for adequately and not being exposed to harm or put at risk, the mother being a sex worker is not a reason for kids to be monitored by SS. People are incredibly judgemental about it but being a sex worker does not automatically = bad mother. Lots of women in all walks of life work as prostitutes or in other sex work for a variety of reasons.

The problem between BB and the average prostitute is that her choices are not a job she keeps separate from other parts of her life, she revels in degradation, she revels in abusing women and she defends people like Andrew Tate, her entire persona is that of sexual degradation, loathing women and pandering to the most repulsive of men. There's no chance at all that any child would be shielded from that.

Nobody normal would want to spend even a minute in her presence or company, her parents are happy to cash in on her degradation, and the only normal influences the child would receive would be at school, where they would be mostly ostracised because of their mother.

She might not traffick the child (but then again she has no moral compass so she might) but the child will be groomed every single day just by living with her, and will be in the company and presence of predatory men as their daily norm.

It's horrifying outcome for any child, and even if someone rescues the child they will then have to know that their mother is this awful person.

I hope it's all a lie, I hope she's sterile, and I hope she never attempts to have any influence or input on the life of any child.

Was thinking the exact same thing.

Gosh I know how awful for the kid, a 14 year old boy/girl knowing that random men lined up to shag your mother for a publicity stunt is terrible beyond words, it would be mortifying for them..

I agree with you that the statements she makes, the messages she perpetuates and the behaviour she normalises in her content are abhorrent and at complete odds with my personal beliefs and values, but none of it is illegal and none of it would be a valid reason for services to remove a child from her.

The only way I could envisage threshold for child protection to be met would be if the child was exposed to explicit material, e.g accompanying her to shoots or viewing porn, if they were exposed to registered sex offenders, or if their basic physical and emotional needs were not being met. If none of that was the case, then their mother having a very controversial job and making outrageous statements just isn’t a child protection concern

There are lots of people I think are awful and court intense negative public attention that I am sure will be very unpleasant for their children growing up (Katie Hopkins springs to mind). It just doesn’t mean they are not adequate parents in the eyes of the law.