Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Bonnie Blue has had her baby

164 replies

greglet · Yesterday 18:39

And she’s already back on social media. Poor baby.

OP posts:
Jane379 · Today 00:37

greglet · Yesterday 18:39

And she’s already back on social media. Poor baby.

No! I think it's best to ignore. Hopefully the baby will be removed if her behaviour becomes really harmful..

Jane379 · Today 00:39

EnglishRose26 · Yesterday 19:24

If the baby is hers, I am pretty sure both the health visitor and the social services team will be monitoring her closely. She is high risk, and clearly not terribly well. I am more interested in her childhood and back story - no one chooses this 'lifestyle' willingly.

I'm not sure. I think she's a psychopath maybe: psychopaths are often detached from their sexuality and use it as a tool to get what they want, and that's exactly what she's doing.

TheFormerMrsTruelove · Today 01:01

honeylulu · Yesterday 23:55

Or am I supposed to laugh because women aren’t supposed to have sex outside of a monogamous relationship and doing so makes them a whore?

Well...
WHORE Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
<a class="break-all" href="http://www.merriam-webster.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › whore
whore
ˈhȯr
noun
plural whores
a person who engages in sexual intercourse for pay : prostitute
a promiscuous or immoral woman

Either definition would seem to rather suit the particular individual who is the subject of the thread.

The point is not that women "aren't supposed to". Women can do what they like. But can't really be prissy about people thinking they are "a whore" if they literally meet the dictionary definition(s) of the word.
I would say the same if you objected to a man being called a gigolo, lothario fuck boi etc if the person was indeed willingly undertaking the role thereof.

It’s …nice that you’ve gone to the trouble of copying and pasting the definition but I understand what the word means, thanks. That’s why I was able to use it contextually.

And ‘the point’ is one that appears to have sailed right over the top of your head. I don’t know how she thinks of herself but I’m certainly not ‘getting prissy’ about whether she does or doesn’t meet the dictionary definition of the word. What I was questioning was why it was funny to say that her vagina had been stretched beyond repair because she’s had the same amount of sex with many men as other women have had with one man.

Absolutelynot2 · Today 01:09

ChakaKan · Today 00:33

I agree with you that the statements she makes, the messages she perpetuates and the behaviour she normalises in her content are abhorrent and at complete odds with my personal beliefs and values, but none of it is illegal and none of it would be a valid reason for services to remove a child from her.

The only way I could envisage threshold for child protection to be met would be if the child was exposed to explicit material, e.g accompanying her to shoots or viewing porn, if they were exposed to registered sex offenders, or if their basic physical and emotional needs were not being met. If none of that was the case, then their mother having a very controversial job and making outrageous statements just isn’t a child protection concern

There are lots of people I think are awful and court intense negative public attention that I am sure will be very unpleasant for their children growing up (Katie Hopkins springs to mind). It just doesn’t mean they are not adequate parents in the eyes of the law.

Unfortunately, this is probably true.

Katie Hopkins, however much I disagree with her and find her an irritation and sometimes worse, doesn't encourage barely legal teenagers to fuck her in public or take place in a 1000 man gang bang, or try to set up being fucked in a glass box on display in public, and as far as I know hasn't called Andrew Tate, the rapist sex trafficker, misunderstood. Nor does she say that women who find her abhorrent are just jealous of her because she's fucking their husbands or proclaim that women need to have their insides rearranged by men, nor does she encourage strangulation during sex or say that barely legal boys should perform it on her to try it out.

I don't think Ms Hopkins deserves to be placed in the same category as BB.

Babyboomtastic · Today 01:20

Even setting aside her truly disgusting behaviour whist pregnant (if real...), this poor child is going to have a really difficult childhood.

mulberrymilk · Today 01:35

SilverPink · Yesterday 20:17

There is no way she got pregnant from that stunt, she was already pregnant and most likely thought it would be fun to pretend several hundred guys could be the father instead. And she definitely was pregnant, there were pictures of her heavily pregnant in some hotel abroad in the summer. The bump was real and she had pregnancy weight on her arms and face, just like any other pregnant woman.

Why did she take DNA samples and phone numbers for the 400 men in that stunt then?

mulberrymilk · Today 01:37

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 20:26

It’s not that hard to understand. A penis 1000 times in the vagina has the same impact on the vaginal walls/ muscles whether they belong to 1000 different men or the same one.

although I do wonder how crap women think their vaginal muscles are to perpetuate the old misogynistic myth about wizard sleeved easy women

Er, I think you are missing the fact the 1000 plus men - not all of whom entered her, thank god - did it in short succession over a very short period of time. That is an extraordinary trauma on the vaginal tissues.

Absolutelynot2 · Today 01:42

By the by, prostitution is not work. There are many irrefutable reasons why this is so, but it's always useful to reiterate them.

To get jobseeker allowance you are required to prove you are applying for any eligible jobs you might be reasonably expected to get.

If being a prostitute was a job, therefore, every single unemployed person in the UK would be required to apply for prostitution "work". There would be no exceptions because there is a fetish for every single person. Fat, thin, dying, wheelchair user, paraplegic - there's a vile prostitute user and a manky fetish for every body.

Oh, and as whoremongers always increase demand with supply, no amount of bodies fed to the industry would satisfy the creatures who use prostitutes.

Anyway, aren't you glad it's not a job, since you know you definitely would not want your son, daughter, wife, husband or other loved one having to be a prostitute to survive?

But wait, there's more.

People erroneously try to compare it to dangerous labour, like manual jobs on mining sites. But of course that's nonsense because those jobs do their very best to limit or remove all the harms, using PPE, putting processes in place to try to spare their workers injury.

Men who use prostitutes do not ever accept those sorts of restrictions aimed at saving prostitutes from damage and injury. For many men, harming, strangling, punching and hurting prostitutes is a large part of it, and is quite deliberate.

Sometimes people erroneously try to compare prostitution to a service job, or a cleaning job. But that's nonsense of course, since no prositute abuser would accept being told he had to accept emptying his sperm onto an old woman when he wants to abuse a young woman, or a man when he wants a woman.

Sometimes people erroneously try to compare prostitution to boxing or other harmful jobs - but of course that doesn't work either, because again in boxing men wear gum guards, gloves and and the referee can stop the match at any point, whereas a prostitute being battered by a user has nobody there to help her and he'd laugh if she blew a whistle and tear the gum guard from her mouth if she tried to use one.

Additionally, you cannot unionise as a prostitute because pimps also call themselves sex workers and infiltrate and invade the unions ensuring nobody can offer any effective unionisation or help to prostitutes.

If you do decide to leave your job cleaning toilets, you don't have to have domestic violence assistance, police intervention or any other protection put in place to do so, as so many prostitutes do when they try to escape prostitution. You just hand in your notice and go about your day.

And finally "sex work" is not a neutral term. It was invented by pimps and whoremongers to attempt to normalise the extreme damage and harm done to prostitutes and the horrifying harms of the industry which churns through women and girls, and men and boys, at a horrifying speed.

It is damaging to use the term "sex worker" which is why I use the correct term - prostitute. There's no debate on this, by the way, I've just stated irrefutable facts. If you find yourself becoming enraged by this, that's a you problem. If you attempt to argue with me, you will be unable to do so as I will just keep repeating the facts.

Some people do use the term prostituted women/girls/boys/men - I prefer the simple term prostitutes as some women do choose the life of being a prostitute. See Bonnie Blue.

nomas · Today 02:54

Ihateboris · Yesterday 19:13

Oh I honestly don't know. However, the fact she fucks 1000 men at a time leads me to believe she's not going to be the best mum in the world. Oh, and the fact the baby shower turned into a golden shower. That being said, social services are overwhelmed anyway, so it's a moot point

Yes, I think there is a chance of some really bad exploitation of the baby. I hope I’m wrong.

marvelousmarmaladian · Today 03:20

The difference between sex 1000 times over years and sex 1000 times over a weekend is cystitis.

mcmuffin22 · Today 03:25

Gettingbysomehow · Yesterday 19:00

I thought the baby was supposed to have been a publicity stunt.

Seen as it has apparently arrived two months ahead of schedule and the photo is of her holding a pretty chunky baby I would say it is all fake.

Missey85 · Today 03:37

darkmodedarkmodedarkmode · Yesterday 23:49

the misogyny on this thread is fucking shocking. it actually blows my mind that (presumably) grown women are calling her a ‘slag’ and making fun of her ‘loose’ vagina. it’s like reading posts from moronic teenage boys on reddit. grow tf up

Oh please she's a attention whore as well as a physical one 😂😂😂😂 the truth isn't misogyny

Gingerkittykat · Today 04:13

mulberrymilk · Today 01:35

Why did she take DNA samples and phone numbers for the 400 men in that stunt then?

For publicity and to cause outrage.

I'm another one who thinks this is fake and could be another one of her stunts.

It would be easy enough to stage a photoshoot in a hospital bed and then add a blurred out photo of a suspiciously fake looking baby.

Weirdwonderfully · Today 04:20

likelysuspect · Yesterday 23:13

Where did I say she would or wouldnt be a good parent?

You simply dont seem to understand the thresholds for significant harm.

Oh I do I’ve worked with early years children and also witnessed a child protection case with significant harm she will expose and cause this child harm if it is a real baby. You can already tell by her attitude

New posts on this thread. Refresh page