Well so far my investigations aren't that reassuring. I can find documents for my local area for planning for emergencies and they have a lot of word salad about management, cataloguing, establishing safe locations, resiliency and so on but no actual written plans. They don't tell me much other than they are supposed to be able to know what to do if an emergency strikes.
More interesting is this government document on civil preparedness for war, published in March this year, so ostensibly up to date.
https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/uk-civil-preparedness-for-war-government-strategy/
I've snipped a few salient points from the document but it's worth reading (SDR = strategic defence review 2025
The SDR made several recommendations on strengthening home defence and resilience in the context of the whole-of-society approach, including:
Ensuring the government can achieve a “sustainable and effective transition to war if necessary”. The SDR suggested a new defence readiness bill to provide the government with powers to mobilise reserves and industry in the event a crisis escalates into conflict. The review said the bill should mandate annual reporting on UK warfighting readiness.
(RAP = Resilience Action Plan)
The RAP set out operational steps for strengthening civil preparedness, including:
Asking and supporting the public to take action: The government said it wanted to encourage the public to prepare for emergencies as set out on the government’s ‘Prepare’ website. It committed to increasing transparency with the public about the risks the UK faces through the websites ‘Prepare’, ‘Ready Scotland’ and ‘Foreign travel advice’, and through the deployment of emergency alerts.
In November 2025, the Defence Committee published a report on the ‘UK contribution to European security’, which further considered the government’s approach to UK homeland defence and societal resilience.[38] The committee raised concerns about the UK’s ability to defend its homeland and to meet its NATO article 3 obligations on national resilience.
Key findings include
The UK “lacks a plan” on homeland defence with “little progress on the home defence programme”.[39] The committee also criticised the lack of transparency over the work of the programme. The MoD told the committee that it was working with the Cabinet Office to “ensure that the defence part and the civilian part of the plan are aligned”.[40] However, the committee said it was difficult to assess progress because information on the programme was not published. The committee said this suggested the government did not treat industry or civil society as “partners in delivering outcomes”.
The prime minister’s national conversation on defence and security had “yet to start”, with little public engagement and no clear central direction on the “national conversation”.
Cross-government working on homeland defence and resilience was “nowhere it needs to be.
The report agreed on the need for the whole of society to play its part in strengthening national resilience, but it found that large parts of the population did not “see why this is so important”.