Just been having an argument animated discussion with DH.
He says eggs aren't a suitable food for vegetarians because they have the possibility of becoming living things.
I said they only have that possibility if they have a cockerel with them and an unfertilised egg has no potential of becoming a living thing (there may have been some cases of parthenogenesis in hens for all I know, but that wasn't part of the conversation).
We have now ranged over the idea of whether a vegetarian could eat some of an amputated leg of pork if the pig hasn't been killed or whether a block of wood has the potential to become a chicken (no, but an egg does even if there's no possibility of it being fertilised it seems).
He's finished up by chuckling gently (not at me, he insists) and saying I don't understand his argument.
Am I missing something or do I form up the ducks and get a free hour with a shit hot lawyer NOW?