Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Was I rude for dismissing a stranger who interrupted me on the platform?

685 replies

KookyLemonReader · 23/05/2026 10:46

About a year ago I started a new job in finance in the City which has been very intense. The previous week I have been working very intensely to meet an end of week deadline. I am contractually required to be in the office at least one day a week so on Thurs I dragged myself out to the office. In the early afternoon I was at the local tube station platform waiting for the train and on my laptop deep in work mode when I noticed someone trying to get my attention in my peripheral vision. I turned away from my laptop removed my headphones and listened to the man. He was asking me where my handbag is from. I was very irritated that he interrupted me with this when I was clearly deep in concentration and replied in a cold way ‘I am working’ and went back to my business. A few seconds later I felt bad (also this man was an ethnic minority and I’m a white woman so I worried about that) turned back to him and said I’m sorry I was a bit rude what did you ask. He again asked where my bag is from. I told him the brand (vintage Italian designer). He made some random comment like oh I can’t buy that here I guess. I didn’t engage. Went back to my work. My concentration was lost and I was very annoyed by the whole exchange but also questioning myself. Was I awful or is it fair that he should not have interrupted a clearly full of focus person with a silly question?

OP posts:
TakeMeToTheWest · Today 10:35

Absolutely @orangesandwich

chaosmaker · Today 10:51

vickylou78 · Yesterday 13:10

I'm shocked by the comments....is this a London thing as here in South West it's really normal for people (men and women) to start a conversation. No need to be rude to anyone.

All of you with the man hating - why? Would it have been reacted to same way if was a woman? He may have been asking as he wanted to buy a handbag for his wife or something.

Yes, I would react the same. Don't interrupt someone looking busy unless it is actually important.

GingerdeadMan · Today 13:39

HarryKanesRightFoot · 24/05/2026 21:37

You’re a right ray of sunshine, aren’t you.

You might as well tell her to 'cheer up love'
🙄

Woman: explains why she doesn't encourage every strange bloke who attempts to interact with her - it has had negative consequences in the past.

You: insults her.

Fucks sake.

Are you really of the opinion that women are obliged to be bright, cheerful and friendly to anyone who wants our attention - otherwise we're rude harridans?

Maybe actually read the thread, you might learn something. Sometimes politeness to the wrong man comes with a big cost.

vickylou78 · Today 14:07

Nottopanic · Yesterday 13:13

It’s normal to interrupt someone who is clearly working on a laptop with their headphones on? Come off it.

No ok it's not normal to interrupt someone with a laptop and headphones do id find it a bit odd but can't say it'd bother me that much to be so rude to them that I need to write a thread about the incident!

HarryKanesRightFoot · Today 14:11

GingerdeadMan · Today 13:39

You might as well tell her to 'cheer up love'
🙄

Woman: explains why she doesn't encourage every strange bloke who attempts to interact with her - it has had negative consequences in the past.

You: insults her.

Fucks sake.

Are you really of the opinion that women are obliged to be bright, cheerful and friendly to anyone who wants our attention - otherwise we're rude harridans?

Maybe actually read the thread, you might learn something. Sometimes politeness to the wrong man comes with a big cost.

I am a woman. I have been polite to men, and they have mostly been polite back, but sometimes they have not.

DeftGoldHedgehog · Today 14:15

It's absolutely fine to be politely short with people when you are busy and caught up in something. You don't owe a random your attention for such trivial reasons.

LarksAscending · Today 14:24

Men don’t care where your bag is from. He just wanted attention.

SerafinasGoose · Today 16:46

orangesandwich · Today 09:43

Interesting. I think being performatively kind and being actually kind are not the same thing at all.

A lot of online “kindness culture” has evolved into moral policing and public shaming.

People can become quite cruel while believing they are righteous, because they frame their hostility as justified. Once someone decides they are defending empathy, safety, inclusion or kindness, they often feel licensed to attack whoever they’ve cast as the “bad” person.

The strange thing is- OP is neurodiverse, has diagnosed ADHD and is literally asking if she was rude and even apologised to the man, therefore you'd think people would not be so nasty towards her considering all of this. Its such a ridiculously minor incident as well, the way some people are scolding her for it, you'd think she had spat in his face.

What’s especially depressing to me is that #BeKind became so prominent after the death of Caroline Flack, when there was so much discussion about the damage online pile-ons, public shaming and relentless criticism can do to someone’s mental health.

Yet now you constantly see people weaponising the hashtag while behaving in ways that are openly cruel, hostile and bullying towards complete strangers online.

They’ll preach compassion and awareness of mental health one minute, then publicly humiliate someone over a minor mistake the next, with absolutely no thought for the damage that kind of mass online hostility can actually do to a person. None of them know what someone is already carrying privately, how vulnerable they are, or where they might be mentally.

It feels like the actual message was completely lost. People learned the slogan, but not the lesson.

Caroline Flack had a documented history of mental health problems and should have been subjected to trial by jury/magistrate, not media. It's also worth bearing in mind that Flack was quick to admonish others to #BeKind but was allegedly herself a domestic abuser.

And so the pattern repeats itself, and I've also noticed the ironic pattern that those spouting this slogan are often the last people likely to be associated with the adjective 'kind'. #BeKind translates as 'be kind to me'. 'You don't know what terrible things people are carrying with them' translates as 'look at how hard done by I am'. The performative element as well as the embarrassing lack of self-awareness is manifold with such people. Of course the idea that they could extend that commodity they apparently value so much in the direction of other people never even seems to occur to them.

Instead they come to women's discussion boards to tell other women off for failing to conform with their social conditioning and asserting boundaries of their own.

How dare these women wear headphones in public? What do they think they're doing in refusing to wait on stand-by until some bloke (it's always a bloke, and the woman is always a lone female) decides he wants their attention? Entitled bitches.

bellsofnorwich · Today 16:49

It is extraordinarily odd to castigate a woman like the OP, who is kind enough to apologise to a pest, and has come on here worried she wasn't perfectly kind, for not being kind. When castigating the anxious OP is deeply unkind in and of itself.

orangesandwich · Today 17:02

SerafinasGoose · Today 16:46

Caroline Flack had a documented history of mental health problems and should have been subjected to trial by jury/magistrate, not media. It's also worth bearing in mind that Flack was quick to admonish others to #BeKind but was allegedly herself a domestic abuser.

And so the pattern repeats itself, and I've also noticed the ironic pattern that those spouting this slogan are often the last people likely to be associated with the adjective 'kind'. #BeKind translates as 'be kind to me'. 'You don't know what terrible things people are carrying with them' translates as 'look at how hard done by I am'. The performative element as well as the embarrassing lack of self-awareness is manifold with such people. Of course the idea that they could extend that commodity they apparently value so much in the direction of other people never even seems to occur to them.

Instead they come to women's discussion boards to tell other women off for failing to conform with their social conditioning and asserting boundaries of their own.

How dare these women wear headphones in public? What do they think they're doing in refusing to wait on stand-by until some bloke (it's always a bloke, and the woman is always a lone female) decides he wants their attention? Entitled bitches.

So well said!!

Completely agree 👏

New posts on this thread. Refresh page