Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Ian Huntley has died

570 replies

Viviennemary · 07/03/2026 10:05

That's according to BBC news. Can't say I'm sorry.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
OtterlyAstounding · 08/03/2026 20:36

Allisnotlost1 · 08/03/2026 18:42

It’s true that Norwegian prisons are often held up as exemplary, and they are much less violent, fewer drugs etc, and more effective - Norway’s reoffending rate is less than half the UK’s broadly speaking.

And of course all crimes of sexual violence and IPV are horrible. But they’re about 3x higher here in the UK than in Norway. Which could have course be partly explained by differences in defining sexual violence. ETA: I looked this up and Norway changed the law on rape last year www.reuters.com/world/norway-outlaws-sex-without-consent-europe-strengthens-rape-laws-2025-06-06/

Homicide is about twice as high here.

Assault, robbery and gun and knife crime are also significantly higher in the UK than in Norway. And arguably that’s because we have about twice as many people living in relative poverty (ie on less than 60% of median income). Income inequality - measured by the Gini coefficient - for the UK is .36, for Norway .27 (I did have to look this up, and UK is more unequal than Sweden, Germany, Canada, and just 0.5 behind the US).

It used to be that drug crimes were more common in Norway than UK, but traditionally this was because more energy went into enforcement and prevention.

I do agree that suddenly having better prisons wouldn’t change society, but I don’t think anyone is making that argument in isolation.

Edited

Yes, so I feel the focus shouldn't be on prison conditions. The focus should be on preventing people from ending up in those prisons in the first place, by creating a more equitable society. Then, when fewer people are going to prison, it's easier to make sure they're humane.

I do get what you're saying, and don't entirely disagree - having better prisons can be an indication of a better society (by no means one that's equitable), but I think that the way a society treats its women, children, and disabled is far more indicative of whether it's civilised than how it treats its (mostly) male criminals.

ThatPearlkitty · 08/03/2026 20:53

OtterlyAstounding · 08/03/2026 20:36

Yes, so I feel the focus shouldn't be on prison conditions. The focus should be on preventing people from ending up in those prisons in the first place, by creating a more equitable society. Then, when fewer people are going to prison, it's easier to make sure they're humane.

I do get what you're saying, and don't entirely disagree - having better prisons can be an indication of a better society (by no means one that's equitable), but I think that the way a society treats its women, children, and disabled is far more indicative of whether it's civilised than how it treats its (mostly) male criminals.

then society cannot have capitalism becuase thats one of the main reasons for unequal society

SharonEllis · 08/03/2026 21:23

ThatPearlkitty · 08/03/2026 20:53

then society cannot have capitalism becuase thats one of the main reasons for unequal society

So how do you explain inequality in pre capitalist societies?

Allisnotlost1 · 08/03/2026 22:35

OtterlyAstounding · 08/03/2026 20:36

Yes, so I feel the focus shouldn't be on prison conditions. The focus should be on preventing people from ending up in those prisons in the first place, by creating a more equitable society. Then, when fewer people are going to prison, it's easier to make sure they're humane.

I do get what you're saying, and don't entirely disagree - having better prisons can be an indication of a better society (by no means one that's equitable), but I think that the way a society treats its women, children, and disabled is far more indicative of whether it's civilised than how it treats its (mostly) male criminals.

The focus should be on preventing people from ending up in those prisons in the first place, by creating a more equitable society. Then, when fewer people are going to prison, it's easier to make sure they're humane.

Completely agree that we need to spend more resource on prevention. I see decent prisons as part of prevention too (the greatest cost of offending is reoffending, about 80%). But yes, stopping people ending in prison in the first place is essential.

‘having better prisons can be an indication of a better society’

I don’t think I quite said that. Dangerous prisons contribute to a dangerous society, but there are many other contributory factors.

but I think that the way a society treats its women, children, and disabled is far more indicative of whether it's civilised than how it treats its (mostly) male criminals.

I don’t really understand this. It’s far easier for society to treat the vulnerable well (someone has already said). But also you haven’t listed men at all, so in your view society should treat women and children and disabled people well, but able bodied men, who cares? I fail to see how that would lead to a healthy society without male violence.

ThatPearlkitty · 08/03/2026 23:01

SharonEllis · 08/03/2026 21:23

So how do you explain inequality in pre capitalist societies?

they had similar to capitalism but we didnt call it capitalism

ThatPearlkitty · 08/03/2026 23:05

basically control is in human dna

OtterlyAstounding · 08/03/2026 23:45

Allisnotlost1 · 08/03/2026 22:35

The focus should be on preventing people from ending up in those prisons in the first place, by creating a more equitable society. Then, when fewer people are going to prison, it's easier to make sure they're humane.

Completely agree that we need to spend more resource on prevention. I see decent prisons as part of prevention too (the greatest cost of offending is reoffending, about 80%). But yes, stopping people ending in prison in the first place is essential.

‘having better prisons can be an indication of a better society’

I don’t think I quite said that. Dangerous prisons contribute to a dangerous society, but there are many other contributory factors.

but I think that the way a society treats its women, children, and disabled is far more indicative of whether it's civilised than how it treats its (mostly) male criminals.

I don’t really understand this. It’s far easier for society to treat the vulnerable well (someone has already said). But also you haven’t listed men at all, so in your view society should treat women and children and disabled people well, but able bodied men, who cares? I fail to see how that would lead to a healthy society without male violence.

In regards to your last point, I mean that it's apparently not easier for society to treat the vulnerable well, because it doesn't. There's a massive positive bias towards men (especially white men). Even when they abuse and rape, people are all too keen to defend them, cover things up, disbelieve the victims, or give them a slap on the wrist – while women and children get crumbs.

OtterlyAstounding · 08/03/2026 23:46

ThatPearlkitty · 08/03/2026 20:53

then society cannot have capitalism becuase thats one of the main reasons for unequal society

I wouldn't disagree with that, on the face of it. Socialism as a concept makes far more sense – unfortunately human nature means that works out even less well than capitalism, in practice.

ThatPearlkitty · 08/03/2026 23:49

OtterlyAstounding · 08/03/2026 23:46

I wouldn't disagree with that, on the face of it. Socialism as a concept makes far more sense – unfortunately human nature means that works out even less well than capitalism, in practice.

thats the problem its not socialism itself its humanity thats the issue

Allisnotlost1 · 08/03/2026 23:52

OtterlyAstounding · 08/03/2026 23:45

In regards to your last point, I mean that it's apparently not easier for society to treat the vulnerable well, because it doesn't. There's a massive positive bias towards men (especially white men). Even when they abuse and rape, people are all too keen to defend them, cover things up, disbelieve the victims, or give them a slap on the wrist – while women and children get crumbs.

I just think you’re wildly oversimplifying. There are huge protections for the vulnerable in society (though agree they often fail and could be better still). And while men do experience many advantages, there are also many ways in which men (especially poor men) suffer. Male suicide rates, deaths from some cancers and from cardiovascular disease, and the risk of being a victim of violence are all higher for men. Educational outcomes for white boys are appalling. So I’m not sure that we do take care of men really, and that’s evident in the life histories of almost all men convicted of serious violence - just as it is for women. But nobody wants to hear it about men.

OtterlyAstounding · 09/03/2026 00:32

Allisnotlost1 · 08/03/2026 23:52

I just think you’re wildly oversimplifying. There are huge protections for the vulnerable in society (though agree they often fail and could be better still). And while men do experience many advantages, there are also many ways in which men (especially poor men) suffer. Male suicide rates, deaths from some cancers and from cardiovascular disease, and the risk of being a victim of violence are all higher for men. Educational outcomes for white boys are appalling. So I’m not sure that we do take care of men really, and that’s evident in the life histories of almost all men convicted of serious violence - just as it is for women. But nobody wants to hear it about men.

I think many women are probably of the opinion that male on male violence shouldn't be their problem to deal with - they have their hands full with male on female violence.

Besides, I think it's disingenuous to try to argue that poor men don't have advantages over poor women, and rich men advantages over rich women, etc. Particularly when one controls for other factors, and compares like with like, the male sex always fares better than the female.

All you need to do to see that is look at the sexual assault statistics for England and Wales, where:

  • 20% of women and 4% of men have experienced some type of sexual assault since the age of 16
  • 3.1% of women and 0.8% of men aged 16 to 59 had experienced sexual assault in the last year
  • Approximately 85,000 women and 12,000 men aged 16-59 experience rape, attempted rape or sexual assault by penetration in England and Wales every year

I just don't think that having nice prisons will help that. But we're veering well off topic, here.

SharonEllis · 09/03/2026 05:22

ThatPearlkitty · 08/03/2026 23:01

they had similar to capitalism but we didnt call it capitalism

Yeah right.

HearHareHere · 09/03/2026 06:55

Just off topic slightly here but I just want to thank @OtterlyAstounding and @Allisnotlost1 amongst others earlier on this thread for the insight and intelligent discussion about this difficult subject. Compared to some of the ghoulish vigilantism and bloodlust I’ve read on here as well, it’s been really interesting (& before anyone jumps on me, I’m not defending Huntley 🙄but I agree with the first or second PP @CurlewKate that a prison system where one violent prisoner can murder another (and even worse be held up as some kind of hero) is not a good thing at all).

EasternStandard · 09/03/2026 08:24

OtterlyAstounding · 08/03/2026 23:46

I wouldn't disagree with that, on the face of it. Socialism as a concept makes far more sense – unfortunately human nature means that works out even less well than capitalism, in practice.

Yep. Giving a few people more control rarely works out well.

Allisnotlost1 · 09/03/2026 08:54

OtterlyAstounding · 09/03/2026 00:32

I think many women are probably of the opinion that male on male violence shouldn't be their problem to deal with - they have their hands full with male on female violence.

Besides, I think it's disingenuous to try to argue that poor men don't have advantages over poor women, and rich men advantages over rich women, etc. Particularly when one controls for other factors, and compares like with like, the male sex always fares better than the female.

All you need to do to see that is look at the sexual assault statistics for England and Wales, where:

  • 20% of women and 4% of men have experienced some type of sexual assault since the age of 16
  • 3.1% of women and 0.8% of men aged 16 to 59 had experienced sexual assault in the last year
  • Approximately 85,000 women and 12,000 men aged 16-59 experience rape, attempted rape or sexual assault by penetration in England and Wales every year

I just don't think that having nice prisons will help that. But we're veering well off topic, here.

Of course having ‘nice prisons’ won’t solve any of that, and it’s quite odd that you keep making that connection since no one has made that argument.

It’s easy to say male on male violence isn’t women’s problem, but tell that to mothers whose sons, brothers, partners, fathers are victims of other men. We should be perfectly capable of caring about problems that don’t affect us directly.

But yes, far off topic now.

Mamamamamm · 16/03/2026 20:19

Sarah2891 · 07/03/2026 15:40

You said :

"Good job on the person who bided their time and went in for justice. A punishment long deserved."

That sounds awfully like you are still praising a vile person to me. He deserves no credit for anything.
And don't be an ass. My life is shit but I still won't praise a murderer.

Edited

I think the big thing about that comment is saying he went for justice - no he didn’t. Not a single part of me believes he did this as justice for those beautiful girls .

Pedallleur · 16/03/2026 20:36

It was prison violence. Just part of that life acc to my neighbour who worked in prisons. Huntley's killer wasn't some random prisoner. He was a stone killer. Huntley had apparently been parading about in a Man U shirt which was associated with his victims, so maybe flaunting his notoriety.

Pedallleur · 16/03/2026 20:43

ThatFairy · 08/03/2026 01:19

There's no chances are about a child murderer. They have irrocevably tarnished their soul

Tell it like it is. Look at the inmates of Frankland or Wakefield, no shortage of child killers there. Sidney Cooper is 98 and tried to get parole last year. I read their crimes and there is no remorse. They cross that line and that's it. Prison is an occupational hazard for them. I'd prefer an express elevator straight to Hell was available

Chatterlyssecret · 17/03/2026 10:07

Has Huntley been cremated yet ?

RobinEllacotStrike · 17/03/2026 10:34

He's simply rotting in hell.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page