Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Tourette’s/BAFTAs offensive language

1000 replies

Lochroy · 23/02/2026 16:37

I wasn’t watching, I’ve just read the article on BBC news. I will admit I know little of Tourette’s and therefore posting to understand.

The tics agree involuntary, and often use offensive language. But what I’m struggling to get my head around is excusing use of the N word because it was caused by the disability when it was (seemingly) only directed at black people?

Also presumably it’s learned vocab so children don’t have swear words as tics? How does this develop?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Randomchat · 23/02/2026 18:21

Because the Tourette's makes you say the worst possible thing for that given moment

I didn't know that. I've learned something today.

It's still hard to hear though. Even if you know the intention isn't to hurt

I think this can also be true. I feel for everyone involved.

HelloPossible · 23/02/2026 18:22

How do people tell if someone with Tourette’s is being malicious or it’s his/ her condition? It seems hard to tell to me and many people are just randomly rude to people especially to those who are different. It’s asking a lot from people to just be understanding and not take offence.

BAFTA have failed in my opinion, there was lots they could do. It's highly embarrassing for them.

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:22

FourNaanJeremy · 23/02/2026 18:20

There’s not much point in apologising if there was nothing you could do to prevent it though, is there?

The apology being sought by some is surely covered by the pre-warning that members of the audience had Tourette’s and may involuntarily say offensive comments.

Well there was something that could be done to prevent it. He had already yelled out several offensive things. When he realised it was escalating because it was a high pressure situation, he could’ve excused himself.

CheeseWisely · 23/02/2026 18:22

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:18

But while they know that now, it doesn’t change what happened in the moment and the fact that for a long time they will have believed they were being racially abused while speaking on a global stage.

But it’s only black men, so it doesn’t really matter!

Except that everyone there had been advised there was an audience member with Tourette’s before it started and he’d shouted over Alan Cumming twice before an award was presented. But sure, it came right out of the blue for them no doubt.

TheDogIsMine · 23/02/2026 18:23

One of my best friends regularly has interactions with him, indeed “big tits” and “slag” are common names she deals with, he apologises and she keeps telling him it’s absolutely fine.

There is no denying that things that are said can be hurtful. For sure. But surely and understanding should quickly follow that too? Are we really devoid of that in this age?

To claim there was intent is pure nonsense.

To suggest he shouldn’t have been in attendance is ableist.

John hasn’t fought all his life and come to this legendary point to be cancelled. The BBC done him dirty for not removing it in the first place - did he really need to wake up to further shame? He already removed himself from the ceremony because he knows it’s wrong. That’s sad - that was one of the biggest nights of his life. I spent the whole morning worried about him and I hope he has support. I also hope he sees the positive support.

I only hope the drama it’s caused pushes I Swear and Johns Not Mad to reach and educate even more people. It has certainly highlighted to me that Americans aren’t as clued up as the Uk, and ironically that’s probably down to the work John has done in the last decades.

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:24

CheeseWisely · 23/02/2026 18:22

Except that everyone there had been advised there was an audience member with Tourette’s before it started and he’d shouted over Alan Cumming twice before an award was presented. But sure, it came right out of the blue for them no doubt.

How do they distinguish who has said what? Were they provided with a recording of his voice? Of course they weren’t.

CoralOP · 23/02/2026 18:25

This is WILD. I watched the film and I thought Jesus crist were people actually that thick back in the 90s that they didn't understand about tourettes and here in 2026 people are still ignorant idiots!

I honestly had no idea that people still don't understand its completely involuntary and the worst things are said in the moment.

If people actually think he should apologise when he says something out of line he would constantly be apologising. Constantly! He lives in 2026 so everybody knows about the condition so this has moved society on from the poor tourettes suffers to have to live their lives apologising.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 23/02/2026 18:25

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:21

Okay, I’m going to assume you’re a woman.

Let’s say you’re speaking at a huge work event. You’re nervous. This is a huge moment in your career. You’ve put hours of effort into your speech, this is your moment. Maybe you’ve endured lots of sexist abuse in the past.

You’re finally on stage. You’re getting ready to speak and someone yells a misogynistic slur at you. You have to continue your speech. In that moment, are you really going to sit and think “oh maybe it was XYZ that caused it”?

No. You’d be upset. You’d be shocked and overwhelmed and to be honest very fucking angry that your moment was interrupted in such a way.

You then find out it was someone with Tourette’s. Does that provide an explanation? Yes. Does it undo those feelings and make the moment any less hurtful? No.

It’s ironic that those preaching empathy and understanding refuse to have any for the men who were abused.

If I’d been told in advance that someone with Tourette’s was in the audience I’d feel terribly sorry for them and try to put them at ease. Because I’m a decent human being.

FourNaanJeremy · 23/02/2026 18:26

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:22

Well there was something that could be done to prevent it. He had already yelled out several offensive things. When he realised it was escalating because it was a high pressure situation, he could’ve excused himself.

He yells out offensive things almost constantly. That is literally his condition. With your logic, if he removed himself from every situation, he would never go anywhere or do anything.
He had every right to be there and should not have felt he had to leave because of his disability.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 23/02/2026 18:26

CoralOP · 23/02/2026 18:25

This is WILD. I watched the film and I thought Jesus crist were people actually that thick back in the 90s that they didn't understand about tourettes and here in 2026 people are still ignorant idiots!

I honestly had no idea that people still don't understand its completely involuntary and the worst things are said in the moment.

If people actually think he should apologise when he says something out of line he would constantly be apologising. Constantly! He lives in 2026 so everybody knows about the condition so this has moved society on from the poor tourettes suffers to have to live their lives apologising.

Perhaps the furore will make these ignorant people watch the film and some good will come of it.

ComeOnJeremy · 23/02/2026 18:26

I think BAFTA and the BBC are to blame for the furore here. It’s seems they did almost nothing to address what should have been a very clear risk, and they should have edited it out of the broadcast (as they have now done, too late). They had a duty towards all three of the people involved and it seems that they considered none of them, which is why poor John is at the centre of such a shitshow. The person who will suffer most from this failure is John rather than the two millionaire actors - it’s appalling.

Pricelessadvice · 23/02/2026 18:26

It’s a disability and he can’t help it.
I think people just have no understanding of it and assume that the person is voicing their inner thoughts. They aren’t.

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:26

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 23/02/2026 18:25

If I’d been told in advance that someone with Tourette’s was in the audience I’d feel terribly sorry for them and try to put them at ease. Because I’m a decent human being.

That’s such rubbish and you know it. Because in that moment, you have no idea who has yelled it.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 23/02/2026 18:29

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:22

Well there was something that could be done to prevent it. He had already yelled out several offensive things. When he realised it was escalating because it was a high pressure situation, he could’ve excused himself.

He was invited for a reason. To celebrate him. They knew of his disability. It’s literally what the fucking film is about. He absolutely should not have had to leave and miss the reason why he was there.

RedToothBrush · 23/02/2026 18:29

Overtheatlantic · 23/02/2026 17:58

I don’t believe that abuse is only abuse if there is intent. I’m not proposing anything so don’t try to provoke an argument. But if someone is incapable of understanding that they are being abusive then I believe their access to the world should be limited. This is obviously an emotive subject.

Wow. You are abusing people with an uncontrollable medical condition.

Do you think you should be locked up too?

TutTutTutSigh · 23/02/2026 18:29

TutTutTutSigh · 23/02/2026 18:20

I'm torn on this. I appreciate he has a disability, but feel awful for the poor men on stage who presumably only heard racist abuse being shouted from the crowd at the time. Afterwards, with context, they may be understanding but I can't imagine how that felt in the moment.

Bigger question I suppose, does one person's disability and right to attend events trump the protected characteristics of the people on the receiving end of that person's outbursts?

I can't edit so adding:

If everyone was made aware in advance and there had been other things shouted throughout the night, and the men in question knew all this, then hopefully they were less shocked and upset by it.

Agree with everyone that it should have been edited out to prevent the media shitstorm, either way.

Oblivionnnnn · 23/02/2026 18:30

Overtheatlantic · 23/02/2026 18:16

I guess you have your answer. I was trying to be kind.

Sorry I’m not sure what you mean?

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 23/02/2026 18:30

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:26

That’s such rubbish and you know it. Because in that moment, you have no idea who has yelled it.

I’ve actually been in a very similar situation in church with disabled people who yell out inappropriate things and carried on with understanding and empathy so it’s actually not fucking rubbish.

attichoarder · 23/02/2026 18:30

I think this issue is complex and one which applies across numerous contexts. The words used were offensive, I think the words should not have been broadcast so yes the broadcast should have been censored. The film is about Tourettes, therefore those who choose to see the film know what to expect, this was not the case for those tuning into the awards. There is a wider issue about the use of offensive words at events/in public. This awards ceremony was for adults and therefore adults have the ability to be compassionate to those who suffer from Tourettes. However, someone with Tourettes using these offensive words in a child friendly environment would in my view be different, for example had this been at a children's play area or in another public space which was frequented by children.

Sensiblesal · 23/02/2026 18:31

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:00

Nobody’s saying he should be confined to his house.

But he had apparently shouted multiple offensive things before this incident. At what point does it turn from him doing it involuntarily to him choosing to sit there and know he will be shouting these things?

If someone had a stoma bag that started leaking in a packed theatre, would you say “oh it’s their disability, it’s not their fault, let them stay”, while disrupting others? Or would you expect them to excuse themselves and clean the mess?

He did excuse himself. He missed the 2nd half of the awards show.

you lack compassion. He should not have to apologise or lock himself away because he has a medical condition & said things that were completely out of his control

BlushingBrightly · 23/02/2026 18:31

CheeseWisely · 23/02/2026 18:22

Except that everyone there had been advised there was an audience member with Tourette’s before it started and he’d shouted over Alan Cumming twice before an award was presented. But sure, it came right out of the blue for them no doubt.

And all the presenters were sitting in the audience for that warning, were they? They were specifically told that this might include slurs and insults directed at characteristics of the people on stage? Come on, you can't be this impervious to shock and hurt being felt by anyone in the moment. Neither has said anything critical nor did they react in the moment. Even so, people are finding fault with them and other black people for not being good enough Uncle Toms.

Kendodd · 23/02/2026 18:31

Lampzade · 23/02/2026 16:48

Yes
Also, they edited it out when someone shouted out ‘Free Palestine’ but not when the N word was used by someone with Tourettes
One of the presenters is an American actor
Michael B Jordan .
Imagine how awful he felt having come to the UK to present an award and having to face this

With regard the 'Free Palestine' comment, if the person shouting it had tourette's then I don't think it should have been edited out. If they didn't, I think it should. I can see why the BBC left the N word in, I bet the really agonised over what the right thing to do was. I think it's something with no right answer. If somebody with tourette's called me a 'cunt' I wouldn't be offended, I'd be more worried about assuring them it was ok, and not to worry.

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:31

Sensiblesal · 23/02/2026 18:31

He did excuse himself. He missed the 2nd half of the awards show.

you lack compassion. He should not have to apologise or lock himself away because he has a medical condition & said things that were completely out of his control

I think it’s ironic that I’m being told I lack compassion when a whole thread of people are seemingly happy to ignore the very valid feelings of the black men who were abused.

Oblivionnnnn · 23/02/2026 18:32

HelloPossible · 23/02/2026 18:22

How do people tell if someone with Tourette’s is being malicious or it’s his/ her condition? It seems hard to tell to me and many people are just randomly rude to people especially to those who are different. It’s asking a lot from people to just be understanding and not take offence.

BAFTA have failed in my opinion, there was lots they could do. It's highly embarrassing for them.

How do you tell if someone with partial blindness isn’t just ignoring you?

How do you tell if someone with partial deafness just can’t be arsed answering you?

How can you tell if someone in a wheelchair isn’t faking and could easily walk?

Do you have any clue how much harder this decades old attitude makes life for people with Tourette’s?

RedToothBrush · 23/02/2026 18:32

In the last year DH had to make emergency calls about our friend because she was suicidal due to Tourettes. She has it really badly and the medication she takes for it doesn't always work and has side effects.

The ignorance here is really dreadful. I wouldn't wish Tourettes in my worst enemy.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread