Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Tourette’s/BAFTAs offensive language

1000 replies

Lochroy · 23/02/2026 16:37

I wasn’t watching, I’ve just read the article on BBC news. I will admit I know little of Tourette’s and therefore posting to understand.

The tics agree involuntary, and often use offensive language. But what I’m struggling to get my head around is excusing use of the N word because it was caused by the disability when it was (seemingly) only directed at black people?

Also presumably it’s learned vocab so children don’t have swear words as tics? How does this develop?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Possiges · 23/02/2026 21:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SimpleSingle · 23/02/2026 21:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Do you believe John should apologise to everyone he offends due to his medical disability?

I haven’t watched his film, but I would imagine he has been ridiculed, discriminated against, vilified over his lifetime. Why not make him also apologise for this cruel illness he suffers from. If we shame him enough, maybe he’ll lock himself away somewhere where he can’t upset people. Being made to feel ashamed of these ticks gives his condition more power. Can’t you see that? Can’t we use a common sense approach and understand that John runs this risk every time he sets foot out of his front door. Can’t we let him live his life, with the understanding that he won’t be held accountable for these words that have no meaning or intent? Or do you feel we need to make him suffer further by holding him to account?

callmeLoretta1 · 23/02/2026 21:02

PieLoe · 23/02/2026 20:58

I think that racial slurs that are irrelevant to what’s being filmed should be edited out. Black people aren’t a teaching moment. @DallasMinor
The film is a teaching moment though. It’s spreading awareness and that people with TS cannot help it. It happens in RL. People absolutely must be aware of it. It shouldn’t be edited. John is a legend for his life story and allowing us insight. He went through hell. Please watch the film everyone, it is incredible and what he had to go through. The swearing comes in many forms and that’s the truth of living with TS. My DD has it and coprolalia also. Not many do, only 10% have the coprolalia. It was shocking at first re DD but it cannot be controlled. She told my own Dad to FO & it was a bit of a shock to him, he’s in his 80’s, I know everyone will be thinking this can’t be right but that is the truth of it, it’s involuntary. These tics are to be ignored but please don’t edit. The awareness is extremely important otherwise our children could also be exposed to having a beating just like what happened to John. I always say, put yourself in their shoes, let’s not edit these things, it is an important teaching tool. Teachers have told her off, I’d like more awareness in teacher training too. I know this is difficult to hear, but I absolutely needed to post.

Us black people and our intergenerational trauma is NOT a 'teaching moment'. You want empathy for your daughter, which is understandable, but you have absolutely no empathy for us black people. Again, we are NOT a teaching moment for some other group. African Americans and other black people should not have to hear that comment. There is no excuse possible for keeping it in. The film is enough of a teaching moment as it is.

MissAustenMadeAQuilt · 23/02/2026 21:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Well said!

TheEdenSide · 23/02/2026 21:03

callmeLoretta1 · 23/02/2026 20:31

As a person of colour I can assure you the impact is still the same. The impact of that word, still hurts us and haunts us. Intent makes NO difference.

There’s no intent.

The impact is nothing to do with disabled people and everything to do with your inability to see that JD was not attacking black people.

Longtalljosie · 23/02/2026 21:03

BlushingBrightly · 23/02/2026 20:27

This would have more credibility if the BBC hadn't shown themselves in parallel scenarios to be so afraid of causing any offence that they censored output ahead of time, ie with Kneecap at Glastonbury. They evidently felt that the chance of these 'indistinct words' causing offence wasn't that important to them, or they'd have edited it out to be on the safe side. Do better.

That’s massive whataboutery. Live broadcasting is difficult. There will have been multiple other things shouted out during the ceremony, all of which will have been checked. Ironically, the reason they were “on i it” with the Free Palestine chant was because that’s the sort of thing one would expect at a ceremony. Mercifully, this isn’t. It was listened to, repeatedly, and nothing intelligible was heard. The BBC didn’t broadcast the n-word, it broadcast a sound which we know from others in the hall was someone shouting the n-word. It never, ever, would knowingly have done so. It takes that word incredibly seriously, as indeed you would hope.

SpaceRaccoon · 23/02/2026 21:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Here is his statement, you can decide for yourself:

https://x.com/StanCollymore/status/2026014761524117854

Stan Collymore (@StanCollymore) on X

Statement from John Davidson.

https://x.com/StanCollymore/status/2026014761524117854

DotAndCarryOne2 · 23/02/2026 21:03

SpaceRaccoon · 23/02/2026 21:01

I'm genuinely upset and gutted for Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo, they must have been so shocked in the moment if they weren't expecting it.

I'd like to think that they are decent, intelligent and compassionate men who would understand that no hurt or offense was intented, once they understood the situation, but I do also feel sad that they would have had that moment where they possibly thought someone was abusing them intentionally.

And this is the crux of the matter isnt it ? Two things can be true at the same time. The slur rightly causes hurt and offence, but because the shouting of it was as a result of disability, common sense takes over with the realisation that no offence was meant.

Possiges · 23/02/2026 21:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Vivi0 · 23/02/2026 21:05

callmeLoretta1 · 23/02/2026 20:53

You obviously don't understand how black people feel. This thread in itself with the racism here is horrifying. Especially when there is no effort made to understand where us black posters are coming from. That lack of empathy is shameful.

From reading your posts on this thread, it’s really interesting to hear you talk about a lack of empathy and others not understanding how you feel, because you have shown zero empathy towards JD or made any effort to understand how he may feel.

Despite the man having Tourette’s, you say you’re not sure if he meant his tic or not.

Despite the man attempting suicide, and having his entire life destroyed by his disability, you have said that his disability has a greater impact on others than it does on him.

It is your lack of empathy which is shameful.

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 23/02/2026 21:05

SpaceRaccoon · 23/02/2026 21:03

Here is his statement, you can decide for yourself:

https://x.com/StanCollymore/status/2026014761524117854

Save your energy. I can see it coming now.

yes he apologised but he didn't apologise in the right wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

Livelovebehappy · 23/02/2026 21:05

Oblivionnnnn · 23/02/2026 20:59

I get what you’re saying but…it’s uncontrollable and sometimes riotously constant. If he apologised every time he had a tic he’d literally never get to move through his day and get things done.

Agree. And I have a feeling that had he apologised the once, he would still be attacked on here for not apologising after each incident. Many on here would prefer he was visited by police, arrested and marched to a cell for the crime of hate speech. They’re so utterly blinkered they can’t see from any perspective other than what fits their own agenda. It’s sad that some posters on here are displaying their prejudices towards disabled people, as if it’s a race to the bottom.

SpaceRaccoon · 23/02/2026 21:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You're going too far with your unpleasantness. John Davidson has been on documentaries since he was a teen, and many, particularly in Scotland, do feel a personal connection. He's been one of the drivers as to why Tourettes is more widely understood in the UK than the US.
There's no need to sneer at people referring to him as John or Johnny. Don't be cruel.

TheEdenSide · 23/02/2026 21:06

canklesmctacotits · 23/02/2026 20:32

You keep making this point, that not intending to do harm absolves a person of all responsibility for their actions, forcing the victim to not just deal with what they’ve been forced to handle but also take on the burden of compassion and understanding for their aggressor. This is what 8 and 9 year olds say: but it wasn’t my fault!!! I didn’t meaaaaaan it!!!

Adults are responsible for their actions, morally and under the law. That’s the only way to organize a society. Otherwise we can all go about maiming and harming and hurting and killing and raping and abusing and just say “I didn’t mean to!”.

With disabilities we all KNOW there’s no intent (most of the time). That’s just not the point. The point is apportioning responsibility for outcomes, because someone somewhere is paying a price. And responsibility always lies with the perpetrator (except in cases of duress where it additionally lies with the coercing person).

Do you understand this?

Jordan and London are not victims. There was no attack, so there are no victims. Disabled people are not “perpetrators” (disgusting word) just because they exist.

that not intending to do harm absolves a person of all responsibility for their actions

In this case - correct.

Heres a revelation for you: sometimes there nobody to blame. The over willingness to always be the victim falls foul when there’s no one to blame.

it’s awful if people feel upset by his words - but there’s nothing that can be done that doesn’t mean locking disabled people away. He’s not to blame anymore than you are to blame. You’ll have to find a way to square that with yourself. Or perhaps lock yourself away so your ableist views can’t harm disabled people

MissAustenMadeAQuilt · 23/02/2026 21:06

SpaceRaccoon · 23/02/2026 21:03

Here is his statement, you can decide for yourself:

https://x.com/StanCollymore/status/2026014761524117854

Thank you for quoting what he said @SpaceRaccoon

I have read it. That is not an apology.

Fleetheart · 23/02/2026 21:06

Lampzade · 23/02/2026 16:50

Has he apologised for his actions ?

what on earth are you asking this for? do you have no comprehension?

runningonberocca · 23/02/2026 21:07

whereismyhusband · 23/02/2026 18:04

But what they DO have control over is whether they allow themselves to stay in that situation. He was well aware he was being offensive. So why did he stay in the room to cause offence?

In that case you are suggesting that his very presence causes offence. He has zero control over this - it’s what the condition is . It’s like asking a blind person to leave the room in case someone is offended because they can’t see. His condition means that he has verbal tics, which he cannot suppress. This is going to be worse if stressed or excited or anxious. Please at least try to understand. He did leave the event to avoid causing further offence but I’m absolutely gutted for him that he had to leave because of his disability. It should have been such a proud event for him and now because of lack of understanding and education it’s turned into this. The BBC should have edited it and the other actors etc should have had some advance explanation of the condition so they would know that it lacked intent. I’m not trying to minimise the black actors experience. Racist slurs are abhorrent but in this case he literally had no control over what he said . It’s involuntary -ie not under conscious control

callmeLoretta1 · 23/02/2026 21:07

TheEdenSide · 23/02/2026 21:02

No it doesn’t a but when there is NO intent your bigoted argument falls down

Do you really care about fighting racism? Then go fight it. There are countless examples of ACTUAL racism happening right now, this very moment. Go and speak about that. Oh but wait - you won’t be able to stick the boot into disabled people if you stay to object to ICE or displacement in Sudan, or the many attacks in the UK over the weekend so maybe it’s not actually your bag

Did you read my post? I said intent (or lack thereof) does not outweigh impact. Meaning, it doesn't matter whether it was intended OR NOT, the impact is still the same. So no, my argument does not 'fall down' because my entire...argument is that intent does...not...matter.

And I am fighting racism, or at least am trying to educate bigoted posters on this thread.

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 23/02/2026 21:07

Called it.

Matronic6 · 23/02/2026 21:07

callmeLoretta1 · 23/02/2026 20:50

So people can say anything and the resulting impact is not their fault. I see.

This thread is disgusting.

I previously worked with a black teen with tourettes. This was one of the words he used in response to black people. He also used offensive words for Indian, Chinese, Australian, Irish people, specifically around those people. He would typically use paedo for middle aged men rather than younger men who got wanker, bastard whilst slut/whore/cocksucker was around women including me.

The condition is completely involuntary, isolating, debilitating and incredibly hard to live with. There was never any intent behind his words, he didn't not choose to say them and the fact he did say them was not a sign of anything other than his condition. He regularly called his own father, an incredibly loving dad a mixture of the two above. It literally doesn't mean anything.

Sadly, he has become more isolated and retreated into his home and family rather than dealing with the response of people who have zero understanding and empathy for the condition. I wish people had more compassion, empathy and a simple willingness to actually learn about conditions before being so judgemental.

SpaceRaccoon · 23/02/2026 21:07

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 23/02/2026 21:07

Called it.

Yep.

TheEdenSide · 23/02/2026 21:08

callmeLoretta1 · 23/02/2026 20:33

Well said. I am shocked at the hateful ignorance in this thread about the impact of that word on our community. I shouldn't be, it is Mumsnet and it is well known for having a racism problem, but it does feels like a lot of people are excusing racist terminology because of 'intent'. Intent or lack of ain't making it hurt less!

No but it also doesn’t make the disabled person at fault

Have a conversation about the impact of words, sure. But don’t think it gives you license to be ableist.

I’d also ask if MN is so apparently racist - why do you stick around?

DotAndCarryOne2 · 23/02/2026 21:08

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

And by the same token where is your empathy and compassion for a disabled person who, if some people had their way, would spend his life apologising for his disability ?

Possiges · 23/02/2026 21:09

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Wowwhataworld · 23/02/2026 21:09

Lochroy · 23/02/2026 16:37

I wasn’t watching, I’ve just read the article on BBC news. I will admit I know little of Tourette’s and therefore posting to understand.

The tics agree involuntary, and often use offensive language. But what I’m struggling to get my head around is excusing use of the N word because it was caused by the disability when it was (seemingly) only directed at black people?

Also presumably it’s learned vocab so children don’t have swear words as tics? How does this develop?

Imagine being in a room and the one thing you’re not supposed to say comes out. It could be fat cow, speccy bastard I think this is what Tourette’s is like they try not to but it can’t be helped and is normally the most inappropriate thing that could be said in that moment. It’s a horrible thing because not only can they feel immense levels of guilt, it’s uncontrollable, exhausting and people are forever judging you.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread