Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Which countries is Russia a threat to?

177 replies

Wobblylegs1 · 07/12/2025 23:02

National Service is back on the agenda in Germany and France and on R4 Any Questions this weekend it seemed to be taken for granted that there is a ‘growing threat from Russia’.

Obviously, there is a threat to the old soviet bloc be because Putin sees them as ‘Russian’. Surely he wouldn’t be interested in expanding into Western Europe though? Russia already owns a huge sprawling chunk of land and struggles to sustain its population. Putin is bonkers, but I haven’t seen any suggestion that he has 1930s-style ‘conquer the whole world’ delusions? I don’t really understand what sort of a threat he poses and to what end? Anyone care to share their thoughts?

OP posts:
Lemonfrost · 08/12/2025 11:24

Friendlygingercat · 08/12/2025 01:30

The UK has committed up to £21.8 billion for Ukraine with no public referendum or mandate. This money should have been spent at home. A corrupt third world country on the fringes of Europe. We should never have got involved with them. Zelensky is a supurb showman such that many European leaders have forgotten about the corruption and come to regard him as some sort of saintly figure.

Hmmmmmm OK.

SaverMaeva · 08/12/2025 11:37

Alexandra2001 · 08/12/2025 09:32

The US has never initially stood with the UK or Europe, both in WW1 and 2 they only came to help when they themselves were attacked, in both cases several years later.
WW1, German subs sinking US ships, WW2 Pearl Harbour.

Trump will never commit US troops to fight for Europe and he has set that agenda for future POTUS as well.

TBH he is more likely to support Russia, given his views on Ukraine being the instigator of war!

Art 5 is dead, who would go to war and trigger WW3 if Russian invaded Estonia?

UK has arms for 10 days of war, with a total failure to re supply what it has given to Ukraine.
We have a current plan to rearm inside the next 10 years...

Putin may well overwhelm Ukraine, who have equipment and men to last until the spring, with Europe incapable for supplying better and more munitions.

Edited

Trump won’t be in power for that much longer and as I’ve said, they wouldn’t get involved for the sake of it, but Europe are their main ally so it would have consequences for them by not helping. It doesn’t have to be boots on the ground, it could be intelligence sharing etc etc…. In the same way the EU are helping Ukraine.

I don’t think Russia are in a particular great situation to start attacking other countries when it can’t even gain a stronghold in Ukraine right now.

IBorAlevels · 08/12/2025 11:38

Trump and Putin both look like they've seen better days. I'm more worried about who comes next when they start keeling over or, more likely, die whilst having sex on Viagra.

SaverMaeva · 08/12/2025 11:49

Bambamhoohoo · 08/12/2025 08:18

The uk isn’t massively important in the military response. NATO is and the US is vital to that.

this isn’t WW2. The EU is far more important to the US. We’ll just get an invite to the summit.

im not concerned about Russia. They’re clearly full of shit, and China is unlikely to step in as they’re not particularly interested either.

I don’t think the US needs any country really that’s why they threaten to leave NATO we need them more of course, but it’s all just pie in the sky really. China needs Europe to continue purchasing goods from there and whilst they may support Putin in general terms, it’s doubtful they’ll be willing to ruin their own economy for nothing.

DuncinToffee · 08/12/2025 11:49

Russia approves the new US national security strategy.

Today’s Russian papers are loving the new US national security strategy. One Russian paper on the implications for Europe: “Trump isn’t their Daddy any more.” Kremlin spokesman comments: “The adjustments in the updated strategy correspond in many ways to our vision”

Laiste · 08/12/2025 12:06

He's 73 isn't he? Putin.

Here's hoping he pops his clogs soon !

ClockGoesBack · 08/12/2025 12:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ClockGoesBack · 08/12/2025 12:21

Laiste · 08/12/2025 12:06

He's 73 isn't he? Putin.

Here's hoping he pops his clogs soon !

He’ll be replaced by Putin 2.0. The regime will survive.

Majority of Russians are brainwashed to the point on no return and anyone who doesn’t agree is prosecuted, killed or have to leave Russia, if lucky.

HauntedBungalow · 08/12/2025 12:48

Pedallleur · 08/12/2025 09:17

Not many leaders (and certainly not the authoritarian type) care about body numbers.

They care about demographic change though which is what happened to Russia post 1930s famines and WWII losses. The repercussions of WWII are still being felt decades later with huge cyclical troughs in the birth rate as each small generation subsequently comes of age. This was further entrenched by millions of deaths in the 1990s caused by financial crises and food shortages and again the demographic shortages will continue to cyclically repeat. Russia has a large population but they've lost sufficient numbers that it is an issue now, hence press ganging fighters from elsewhere. They know that they can't carry on indefinitely having their young men killed in large numbers.

Bambamhoohoo · 08/12/2025 12:56

I am no military expert but surely needing boots on the ground speaks to how outdated their military is?

why would any sophisticated nation need conscription when modern war would be fought from the air, controlled from miles away? Boots on the ground where needed would be professional and highly trained military. Not the gaggle of prisoners, abused minority groups and alcoholics bumbling around Ukraine looking for women to rape.

Pedallleur · 08/12/2025 13:05

The Russians seem to love a strong leader. Don't spare the knout Ivan!!
Putin wants to show Russia as a strong country (and enrich himself). Also it's in the job description to convert the world to Socialism.

RainbowBagels · 08/12/2025 13:29

Wobblylegs1 · 08/12/2025 06:42

What’s the evidence that they want war with the west?
I can only see evidence that they want to regain some Eastern European nations (but can’t do much about it).

I think its not so much about traditional invasions but destabilising governments and institutions, using propaganda to encourage pro Russian movements, trying to get Russian speakers to flood regions then start separatist movements demanding that countries cede regions to Russia because the people who live there want to be part of Russia etc. Putin cant do everything but he can get loads of puppet governments like Belarus who do his bidding. Trump is in thrall to Putin and clearly wants to be his friend, so he will be no help.

Alexandra2001 · 08/12/2025 13:31

Bambamhoohoo · 08/12/2025 12:56

I am no military expert but surely needing boots on the ground speaks to how outdated their military is?

why would any sophisticated nation need conscription when modern war would be fought from the air, controlled from miles away? Boots on the ground where needed would be professional and highly trained military. Not the gaggle of prisoners, abused minority groups and alcoholics bumbling around Ukraine looking for women to rape.

You think that of the Russian military?

They are slowly pushing back Ukraine and troops are needed to hold ground, they have v sophisticated electronic warfare and have almost unlimited raw materials to manufacturer munitions.

Once the yanks stop supply air defence and other munitions via European/NATO countries, to Ukraine, which will happen soon, Russia will take over the whole place.
& thanks to a complete lack of foresight by the UK and others, we wont be able to do a thing about it.

The American administration now see Europe as the enemy and Russia as their ally.

DuncinToffee · 08/12/2025 13:38

A post about Russian bots got deleted?

Alexandra2001 · 08/12/2025 13:44

SaverMaeva · 08/12/2025 11:37

Trump won’t be in power for that much longer and as I’ve said, they wouldn’t get involved for the sake of it, but Europe are their main ally so it would have consequences for them by not helping. It doesn’t have to be boots on the ground, it could be intelligence sharing etc etc…. In the same way the EU are helping Ukraine.

I don’t think Russia are in a particular great situation to start attacking other countries when it can’t even gain a stronghold in Ukraine right now.

Thats unbelievably naïve.

Vance etc are even more pro Russian than Trump, the Republicans will win again in 2028, the Democrats have no one to counter.

Ukraine is, just, surviving because of US air defence systems, take that away and the Russian air force and their drones and missiles will take over Ukraine.

As i said, even on present supply lines, Ukraine has enough munitions for another few months and 100s of 1000s of Ukrainian men have left or tried to leave Ukraine, they don't want to die on the front line.

India and China are trading fully with Russia, inc supplying them with technology, meanwhile we seek and have got trade deals to help them both along..... talk about digging our own grave.

Beachtastic · 08/12/2025 13:45

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 08/12/2025 05:17

This is what a lot of people are overlooking.

The conflict in Ukraine has turned into a an attritional grind for all parties. It's occupying practically all of Russia's deployable military and severely depleting their stocks of ammunition of all types, and it has completely exhausted their reserve armour and motor pool.

If the Ukrainian conflict ends in a peace agreement, Russia will be able to recover their reserves in a few years, and then their focus will turn to Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Due to the difference in sheer scale, none of the Baltic States will be capable of resisting Russia in the manner Ukraine has, and as for anyone still thinking that NATO will respond en masse to an attack on a Baltic State member, you must be delusional.

Nobody is getting into a hot war with Russia to defend Estonian or Latvian sovereignty, Putin knows this, and it's precisely why he would invade a Baltic State in the first place. It isn't about grabbing territory, it's about the fact it would break NATO and effectively bring about its end as a going concern. The entire precept is mutual defence, and if NATO proves it is not willing to back that precept up when push comes to shove, then it ceases to serve any purpose whatsoever.

It's clear the US would already be reluctant to provide the NATO logistical support that has always previously been relied upon should Russia pick a fight with a minor NATO member along its border. Without that support, even the bigger European NATO members are extremely limited in what they could do to resist or repel a Russian invasion of, for argument's sake, Estonia, so in the meantime the only viable option is to pre-emptively turn the Baltic States into perpetually NATO-occupied fortresses in the first place, and nobody really wants to foot the bill for doing that either, even assuming the Baltic nations agree to the idea, so in reality they are going to be left to the wolves.

This, basically!

Not yet, but Putin might well view the Baltic states as low-hanging fruit at some point.

Alexandra2001 · 08/12/2025 13:47

Pedallleur · 08/12/2025 13:05

The Russians seem to love a strong leader. Don't spare the knout Ivan!!
Putin wants to show Russia as a strong country (and enrich himself). Also it's in the job description to convert the world to Socialism.

Lol You think Putin a Socialist??

Fucking hell.

EasternStandard · 08/12/2025 13:47

DuncinToffee · 08/12/2025 13:38

A post about Russian bots got deleted?

I didn’t see it but posters use bot a lot on here and it gets deleted for good reason.

DuncinToffee · 08/12/2025 13:50

EasternStandard · 08/12/2025 13:47

I didn’t see it but posters use bot a lot on here and it gets deleted for good reason.

The post didn't call out anyone, just a warning.

The Trump 'peace plan' for Ukraine was called out for using Russian language

Efacsen · 08/12/2025 13:55

EasternStandard · 08/12/2025 13:47

I didn’t see it but posters use bot a lot on here and it gets deleted for good reason.

I saw it - not accusatory at all but humorous/non serious

So no 'good reason' other than it triggered the automatic filter

HauntedBungalow · 08/12/2025 13:56

ClockGoesBack · 08/12/2025 12:21

He’ll be replaced by Putin 2.0. The regime will survive.

Majority of Russians are brainwashed to the point on no return and anyone who doesn’t agree is prosecuted, killed or have to leave Russia, if lucky.

Oh come on, Russians aren't brainwashed and nor are they stupid. Most Russians have a clear eyed view of their politicians ime, don't expect them to be honest and certainly don't believe everything they see/hear. Putin worked for them because he kept more of them alive than Gorbachev and Yeltsin managed and brought an end to the disastrous so called "democracy" (which was nothing of the sort, as we would recognise it) that wrecked their economy.

He's treading a fine line now though, with demographic alarm bells sounding again.

EasternStandard · 08/12/2025 14:04

Efacsen · 08/12/2025 13:55

I saw it - not accusatory at all but humorous/non serious

So no 'good reason' other than it triggered the automatic filter

That’s not automatic filter. It’s mnhq deciding to delete.

inezname · 08/12/2025 14:16

'They can't even beat Ukraine one on one'

Except it's not one of one is it? With all the help Ukraine is getting, billions and billions in money, the ammunition, and some of the world's best intelligence services, it's really Russia against half of the world.

You know it's true. "One on one", don't kid yourself.

@SaverMaeva

HauntedBungalow · 08/12/2025 14:21

EasternStandard · 08/12/2025 14:04

That’s not automatic filter. It’s mnhq deciding to delete.

As they should. The tedious self-appointed bot police routinely ruin discussion on this subject by accusing everyone who even slightly diverges from the prevailing narrative built up by long standing prolific posters on multiple Ukraine threads.

Efacsen · 08/12/2025 14:22

EasternStandard · 08/12/2025 14:04

That’s not automatic filter. It’s mnhq deciding to delete.

Sense of humour by-pass by someone then