Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Which countries is Russia a threat to?

177 replies

Wobblylegs1 · 07/12/2025 23:02

National Service is back on the agenda in Germany and France and on R4 Any Questions this weekend it seemed to be taken for granted that there is a ‘growing threat from Russia’.

Obviously, there is a threat to the old soviet bloc be because Putin sees them as ‘Russian’. Surely he wouldn’t be interested in expanding into Western Europe though? Russia already owns a huge sprawling chunk of land and struggles to sustain its population. Putin is bonkers, but I haven’t seen any suggestion that he has 1930s-style ‘conquer the whole world’ delusions? I don’t really understand what sort of a threat he poses and to what end? Anyone care to share their thoughts?

OP posts:
Chersfrozenface · 08/12/2025 04:08

The Baltic states certainly think Russia is a threat to them.

Finland and Sweden do, too. They both applied for membership of NATO in May 2022, just after the invasion of Ukraine. Finland joined in April 2023 and Sweden in March 2024. Remember, Finland had been neutral since the Second World War - and Sweden for 200 years!

springintoaction2 · 08/12/2025 04:26

Also the US and UK will stand together if
WW3 were to happen as they always have.

Have you met Trump?

RedTagAlan · 08/12/2025 04:51

A slight tangent, but what interests me about all this is that ideology has practically gone out the window.

I remember "threads" on telly when I was younger, Reagan talking about freedom, the USSR talking about the evils of capitalism and how communism was better.

All gone, now it's just nutters with massive egos and nukes.

Apart from the EU and other western democracies of course. They still talk about freedom, dictatorships bad etc.

Putin, Trump. Xi... they never talk ideology. Xi pays his ideology lip service in his own country of course, but not on the international stage.

Bungle2168 · 08/12/2025 05:09

No, you won’t see T-72s rolling under Marble Arch, but I can tell you what will happen.

If Putin wins in Ukraine outright, he will do something to test NATO’s resolve. Europe will fracture with the cowards and opportunists siding with Russia, and the rest forming some sort of resistance.

In short, it will be the end both of NATO and of the EU.

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 08/12/2025 05:17

Chersfrozenface · 08/12/2025 04:08

The Baltic states certainly think Russia is a threat to them.

Finland and Sweden do, too. They both applied for membership of NATO in May 2022, just after the invasion of Ukraine. Finland joined in April 2023 and Sweden in March 2024. Remember, Finland had been neutral since the Second World War - and Sweden for 200 years!

This is what a lot of people are overlooking.

The conflict in Ukraine has turned into a an attritional grind for all parties. It's occupying practically all of Russia's deployable military and severely depleting their stocks of ammunition of all types, and it has completely exhausted their reserve armour and motor pool.

If the Ukrainian conflict ends in a peace agreement, Russia will be able to recover their reserves in a few years, and then their focus will turn to Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Due to the difference in sheer scale, none of the Baltic States will be capable of resisting Russia in the manner Ukraine has, and as for anyone still thinking that NATO will respond en masse to an attack on a Baltic State member, you must be delusional.

Nobody is getting into a hot war with Russia to defend Estonian or Latvian sovereignty, Putin knows this, and it's precisely why he would invade a Baltic State in the first place. It isn't about grabbing territory, it's about the fact it would break NATO and effectively bring about its end as a going concern. The entire precept is mutual defence, and if NATO proves it is not willing to back that precept up when push comes to shove, then it ceases to serve any purpose whatsoever.

It's clear the US would already be reluctant to provide the NATO logistical support that has always previously been relied upon should Russia pick a fight with a minor NATO member along its border. Without that support, even the bigger European NATO members are extremely limited in what they could do to resist or repel a Russian invasion of, for argument's sake, Estonia, so in the meantime the only viable option is to pre-emptively turn the Baltic States into perpetually NATO-occupied fortresses in the first place, and nobody really wants to foot the bill for doing that either, even assuming the Baltic nations agree to the idea, so in reality they are going to be left to the wolves.

Wobblylegs1 · 08/12/2025 06:32

IndigoIsMyFavouriteColour · 08/12/2025 01:07

I don’t think any countries are at risk from Russia. The fighting areas are eastern Ukraine, which have been Russian speaking and cultured forever. Russia isn’t interested in taking Europe, why would it be? These are hardly stable economies anymore. Europe is on a downward spiral and nobody wants to own that.

Thanks, that’s what I’ve been thinking, but then we (Western Europe) clearly do seem to feel there is a threat, so I was wondering if I’m missing something.

OP posts:
Wobblylegs1 · 08/12/2025 06:36

ThreeSixtyTwo · 08/12/2025 01:14

I'm from central Europe and we see things less optimistically.

Trump won't just stand down in the end of his term. He will declare some war and use it to cancel elections quoting Ukraine.

EU is under hybrid attacks. Russia, Trump's& Musk's US and China all hate the liberal democracy and EU's ability to set and enforce rules. Brexit was part of that.

Do you think the arch Brexiteers - Farage, Johnson, Rees-mogg etc were knowingly working in the interests of foreign states then? Or manipulated? Or just conveniently backward minded?

OP posts:
SeriaMau · 08/12/2025 06:37

Usually megalomaniac despots and dictators just conquer the one country next to them, the decide that’s enough, and turn their attention to philanthropic projects. Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Tojo, Mao, Saddam, …. They all knew when to stop. 🫤

Wobblylegs1 · 08/12/2025 06:42

Lemonfrost · 08/12/2025 01:22

I think we have to agree to disagree. I think that Russia presents a serious and growing threat in Europe. There is a huge amount of supporting evidence, not least to say their complete lack of interest in the latest stitch up of a peace deal. They want war. They want conflict. They do not care what the cost is.

What’s the evidence that they want war with the west?
I can only see evidence that they want to regain some Eastern European nations (but can’t do much about it).

OP posts:
Pedallleur · 08/12/2025 06:44

A King ain't satisfied until he rules everything sang Bruce Springsteen and Putin wants to expand Russia. He grew up in Soviet Russia and the KGB. He would like to be Tsar. More land, wealth and to be seen as a strong leader. China isn't an ally it has a huge army right on the Russian border. The old adversary the US has changed it's ideas and for a hungry opportunist now could be the time. New tools such as cybercrime are available to spread fear and cause disruption, no need to invade when you can paralyze an infrastructure and use a nerve agent to bring a town or city to a standstll

Wobblylegs1 · 08/12/2025 06:48

Ihavelostthegame · 08/12/2025 01:37

You’re incredibly naive if you think that Russia doesn’t present a significant threat. Maybe not in the traditional military context but certainly they are a massive threat in cyber warfare. Active planning for a massive cyber attack from the likes of Russia is happening. If they attacked the banks, the online payment systems, the power grid or government… All of which are possible and would make life incredibly difficult and uncomfortable here. Modern warfare potentially looks very different. Divide and conquer and bring them down from within.
Just look at what’s going on in the US. Let’s not pretend that Russian influence is having a huge impact on POTUS and his administration. America is on a self destruct path as a direct result. The Russians don’t need to lob bombs at us.

What defence is there against this sort of threat?

OP posts:
Wobblylegs1 · 08/12/2025 06:57

Bungle2168 · 08/12/2025 05:09

No, you won’t see T-72s rolling under Marble Arch, but I can tell you what will happen.

If Putin wins in Ukraine outright, he will do something to test NATO’s resolve. Europe will fracture with the cowards and opportunists siding with Russia, and the rest forming some sort of resistance.

In short, it will be the end both of NATO and of the EU.

A frightening prospect. There are indeed a lot of cowards and opportunists.
And all the time, we not only have to deal with Russia, but stupid Trump. What a twat he is.

OP posts:
Wobblylegs1 · 08/12/2025 07:02

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 08/12/2025 05:17

This is what a lot of people are overlooking.

The conflict in Ukraine has turned into a an attritional grind for all parties. It's occupying practically all of Russia's deployable military and severely depleting their stocks of ammunition of all types, and it has completely exhausted their reserve armour and motor pool.

If the Ukrainian conflict ends in a peace agreement, Russia will be able to recover their reserves in a few years, and then their focus will turn to Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Due to the difference in sheer scale, none of the Baltic States will be capable of resisting Russia in the manner Ukraine has, and as for anyone still thinking that NATO will respond en masse to an attack on a Baltic State member, you must be delusional.

Nobody is getting into a hot war with Russia to defend Estonian or Latvian sovereignty, Putin knows this, and it's precisely why he would invade a Baltic State in the first place. It isn't about grabbing territory, it's about the fact it would break NATO and effectively bring about its end as a going concern. The entire precept is mutual defence, and if NATO proves it is not willing to back that precept up when push comes to shove, then it ceases to serve any purpose whatsoever.

It's clear the US would already be reluctant to provide the NATO logistical support that has always previously been relied upon should Russia pick a fight with a minor NATO member along its border. Without that support, even the bigger European NATO members are extremely limited in what they could do to resist or repel a Russian invasion of, for argument's sake, Estonia, so in the meantime the only viable option is to pre-emptively turn the Baltic States into perpetually NATO-occupied fortresses in the first place, and nobody really wants to foot the bill for doing that either, even assuming the Baltic nations agree to the idea, so in reality they are going to be left to the wolves.

It’s crazy how not wanting go ‘foot the bill’ is preventing us from defending ourselves, our values and beliefs and allies. I can kind of understand the distain for capitalism when money is - quite literally - the be all and end all.

OP posts:
MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 08/12/2025 07:11

Wobblylegs1 · 08/12/2025 06:36

Do you think the arch Brexiteers - Farage, Johnson, Rees-mogg etc were knowingly working in the interests of foreign states then? Or manipulated? Or just conveniently backward minded?

Well, we already know that at least one of Farage's colleagues was taking bribes from the Russians in order to promote Russian interests, and a number of others are being investigated.

I don't think Johnson was acting in the interests of the Russians, but I don't think he was acting in the interests of the UK either. Indeed, I don't think Boris Johnson ever does anything unless he believes it is in the interests of Boris Johnson.

Rees-Mogg? Who knows.

Natsku · 08/12/2025 07:37

I'm in Finland - Russia has always been a threat to us. Not a Eastern European country either. And if Russia attacks Finland the UK has given security guarantees so you'd be dragged in too.

Beyond that, Russia is a threat to all Western countries via hybrid warfare.

Pedallleur · 08/12/2025 07:55

Wobblylegs1 · 08/12/2025 06:48

What defence is there against this sort of threat?

Vigilance, a new Cold War. Britain has joined Norway in active submarine hunting to prevent damage to undersea cables that carry data. Cyber crime can be committed from anywhere by anyone. Some smart Russian people (or 3rd party) sat in a hotel in Argentina can cause chaos and you can't use an army or missiles against that. Good news is Putin is mortal. All the money in the world can't stop him dying by natural causes (or others!!)

Damnloginpopup · 08/12/2025 08:16

SaverMaeva · 08/12/2025 00:56

No I’m not sure, however as big a military power the US is, it still needs allies and places where it can launch its rockets and the like from. It might scream independence but it needs Europe as much as Europe needs it.

It's got 11 Carrier Strike Groups alongside it's real estate. Doesn't really need anyone else to dominate if required.

Bambamhoohoo · 08/12/2025 08:18

SeriousFaffing · 08/12/2025 00:49

@SaverMaeva

“Also the US and UK will stand together if
WW3 were to happen as they always have. They may not always agree but when push comes to shove they have each others backing.”

I was with you until this… Are you sure? I wouldn’t be.

The uk isn’t massively important in the military response. NATO is and the US is vital to that.

this isn’t WW2. The EU is far more important to the US. We’ll just get an invite to the summit.

im not concerned about Russia. They’re clearly full of shit, and China is unlikely to step in as they’re not particularly interested either.

EasternStandard · 08/12/2025 08:31

He’s a threat because he’s willing to fight and lose a lot if young people and so far Ukraine has very sadly had to send their own young people to oppose.

He doesn’t care if it’s millions. We very much care not to have to oppose. I’m not sure what the answer is, even when he’s gone hopefully the next will just not want the same.

Efacsen · 08/12/2025 08:43

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 08/12/2025 07:11

Well, we already know that at least one of Farage's colleagues was taking bribes from the Russians in order to promote Russian interests, and a number of others are being investigated.

I don't think Johnson was acting in the interests of the Russians, but I don't think he was acting in the interests of the UK either. Indeed, I don't think Boris Johnson ever does anything unless he believes it is in the interests of Boris Johnson.

Rees-Mogg? Who knows.

Wasn't Johnson hanging out with the KBG guys son and giving the slip to his security detail in order to party with them at their villa in Tuscany? also elevated him to the HoL against advice

Sorry his name escapes me - owns the Evening Stardard or did at one point

Efacsen · 08/12/2025 08:49

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 08/12/2025 05:17

This is what a lot of people are overlooking.

The conflict in Ukraine has turned into a an attritional grind for all parties. It's occupying practically all of Russia's deployable military and severely depleting their stocks of ammunition of all types, and it has completely exhausted their reserve armour and motor pool.

If the Ukrainian conflict ends in a peace agreement, Russia will be able to recover their reserves in a few years, and then their focus will turn to Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Due to the difference in sheer scale, none of the Baltic States will be capable of resisting Russia in the manner Ukraine has, and as for anyone still thinking that NATO will respond en masse to an attack on a Baltic State member, you must be delusional.

Nobody is getting into a hot war with Russia to defend Estonian or Latvian sovereignty, Putin knows this, and it's precisely why he would invade a Baltic State in the first place. It isn't about grabbing territory, it's about the fact it would break NATO and effectively bring about its end as a going concern. The entire precept is mutual defence, and if NATO proves it is not willing to back that precept up when push comes to shove, then it ceases to serve any purpose whatsoever.

It's clear the US would already be reluctant to provide the NATO logistical support that has always previously been relied upon should Russia pick a fight with a minor NATO member along its border. Without that support, even the bigger European NATO members are extremely limited in what they could do to resist or repel a Russian invasion of, for argument's sake, Estonia, so in the meantime the only viable option is to pre-emptively turn the Baltic States into perpetually NATO-occupied fortresses in the first place, and nobody really wants to foot the bill for doing that either, even assuming the Baltic nations agree to the idea, so in reality they are going to be left to the wolves.

So maybe a balancing act between the Russian economy collapsing/running out of fighting age men and Trump leaving office/Democrats getting their act together

Who knows

Bambamhoohoo · 08/12/2025 08:52

EasternStandard · 08/12/2025 08:31

He’s a threat because he’s willing to fight and lose a lot if young people and so far Ukraine has very sadly had to send their own young people to oppose.

He doesn’t care if it’s millions. We very much care not to have to oppose. I’m not sure what the answer is, even when he’s gone hopefully the next will just not want the same.

They lost 20m holding the eastern line in ww2- it’s in the Russian nature.

Pedallleur · 08/12/2025 08:57

Efacsen · 08/12/2025 08:43

Wasn't Johnson hanging out with the KBG guys son and giving the slip to his security detail in order to party with them at their villa in Tuscany? also elevated him to the HoL against advice

Sorry his name escapes me - owns the Evening Stardard or did at one point

Evgeny Lebdev.

A few Reform people are being caught out with a Russian script. Nigel is a fan of Putin of course.

Efacsen · 08/12/2025 08:59

Bambamhoohoo · 08/12/2025 08:52

They lost 20m holding the eastern line in ww2- it’s in the Russian nature.

Population of Soviet Union 190 million pre WW2

Population of Russia 2025 143 million

Not so many young lives to throw away today

Grumpyoldpersonwithcats · 08/12/2025 09:03

Interesting book I'm reading at the moment. The author posits a well argued scenario starting with an invasion of Estonia.
Worrying because DS2 is studying there at the moment.