Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Richard Tice comments re autism and ear defenders

290 replies

Overthemhills · 19/11/2025 18:16

I’m so tired of the anti-disability rhetoric everywhere on various sites and from various politicians. This one - Tice calling the sight of children wearing ear defenders in school “insane” is about the most stupid and cruel barrel-scraping comments a politician has come out with for a very long time.
My child is disabled but undiagnosed and does not use ear defenders so I have little on the way of skin in the game, or this particular game, but just how low do some people want to go to make the lives of people struggling with disability worse - on top of the cost of living and NHS issues.
I’m starting to think I will need to avoid every news item and social media platform until the next general election at this rate.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
crinklechips · 20/11/2025 09:07

Didwesayitall · 20/11/2025 08:52

More time, extra support, time out, fidget toys, and yes, ear defenders if that helps. Treat all 30 children in the classroom as individuals with unique learning needs. Even the ones who cope well may need certain conditions to fully flourish. Get rid of the EHCP angst for parents and raise the individual support for all learners.

I actually agree with this and i think this is where society gets it wrong with both the young and old, with or without diagnosis (and not just for neurodiversity).

In my (lovely, progressive) workplace we are all encouraged to share a "guide to working with me" which is an opportunity for people to say things like whether they prefer to communicate over email, meet face to face, need time to reflect on decisions, like busy environments or quiet etc. Obviously it's hard to meet everyone's preferences all the time but it's really helpful for getting the best out of people. For example I know one of my colleagues really isn't a morning person so I'll never put in an early meeting with her if I can help it as I know we'll have a much more productive chat later in the day.

Some of us are neurodivergent and it's not a big deal, it's just part of recognising all of our differences. Some people have health conditions, caring responsibilities etc that effect where when and how we work. It's all just part and parcel of recognising our differences and creating a happy and productive workplace.

Pasly · 20/11/2025 09:10

Didwesayitall · 20/11/2025 08:52

More time, extra support, time out, fidget toys, and yes, ear defenders if that helps. Treat all 30 children in the classroom as individuals with unique learning needs. Even the ones who cope well may need certain conditions to fully flourish. Get rid of the EHCP angst for parents and raise the individual support for all learners.

I actually agree with this and i think this is where society gets it wrong with both the young and old, with or without diagnosis (and not just for neurodiversity).

I agree too but the diagnosis is needed for accommodations in exams, which is fair, and it is the same for all disabilities. You do need to prove there is a disability there to secure accommodations for exams so whether it is dyslexia with spelling and grammar waivers, extra time or autism with accommodations of smaller centres and movement breaks the diagnosis is needed to secure these.

Didwesayitall · 20/11/2025 09:19

Portlypig · 19/11/2025 19:02

Tice is a dickhead but the question remains why so many children need ear defenders now when I doubt a single child wore them in 1995. Something is going on - this isn’t me saying ‘they’re not needed’, just that that need wasn’t there before and it is now. So something has changed. It’s a sensible question to ask.

The need has always been there as I was a child in the 80s and significantly impacted by noise. I didn't get the support because it wasn't there and parents didn't know anything about ND.

Also, technology has advanced; We now have solutions to issues (big and small) that were present at the time but may not have been visible until they were (Your phone, hearing aids, washing machine, glasses, microwave, cars, tv, bed, heaters, etc to name a few).

Sausagescanfly · 20/11/2025 09:24

Comments like Tice's appeal to people who are unable to imagine that raising different children may come with different challenges and outcomes to raising their own.

I've had a few cracking comments about my ND child, the issues she has and the fairly small accommodations we make so that life runs more smoothly. Apparently if she had been raised by her Brownie leader she'd eat everything offered and my mum would have told her to pay more attention at school, so she now wouldn't have ADHD.

There is a sad but beautiful irony that it is the people who struggle to put themselves in others shoes who are against ND children having adaptations to improve their experiences and outcomes.

TheCorrsDidDreamsBetter · 20/11/2025 09:27

It's probably important to remember Dickhead Tice's expertise are in property development.

Not healthcare, or neurodivergence, so everything he says about autism or reasonable adjustments is coming from someone who has no real experience of this. He can take his words and shove them back up his tight arsehole.

Didwesayitall · 20/11/2025 09:27

YourFirmLimeHam · 20/11/2025 07:44

Many kids that would have benefited from them either had poor attendance, were already in a special school, or internalised their frustrations until they released it on family members at home.

A lot of those people would be receiving long term mental health care now because their needs were never understood and their mind eventually broke.

A lot of those people would be receiving long term mental health care now because their needs were never understood and their mind eventually broke.

Yep! That's me.

Same as people when they say ARFID never existed. It did, just not by the name. If it never affected you or you didn't have anyone in your family who struggled with severe restrictive eating and limited diet, you may not understand. I did and still do. Also have people in my family who did and still do. It's only now making sense what it is. We just got on with it and lived a very restrictive life in that regard.

crinklechips · 20/11/2025 09:30

Fearfulsaints · 20/11/2025 08:54

Its a really sinister thing to pick on because its a visible sign of what can be a hidden disability. Its like signposting where to direct public ire.

Its also cheap and researched to be effective so it cant be about wasting public funds. It has to be about creating stigma
.

It's a really awful thing for him to have said and I agree with you about the impact on stigma. But I tend to think that people like Tice just spout off without any thought. They'll say stuff in a media interview like they're a man in a pub, with no consideration of the responsibility they have to consider their words. They're just not serious people.

But that's one of the things I worry about - we increasingly seem to be at the mercy of people who just aren't serious. Totally clueless. Seeing this in Reform-led councils all over the place, they haven't got the first idea how to govern. But being profoundly unserious hasn't stopped Trump so...

TheCorrsDidDreamsBetter · 20/11/2025 09:30

Portlypig · 19/11/2025 19:02

Tice is a dickhead but the question remains why so many children need ear defenders now when I doubt a single child wore them in 1995. Something is going on - this isn’t me saying ‘they’re not needed’, just that that need wasn’t there before and it is now. So something has changed. It’s a sensible question to ask.

That's like saying so many blind people use tactile pavements these days to help them cross the road safely, you're not saying they're not needed, but they definitely weren't needed before 1965 so something has changed.

You're right, the world has changed significantly, but there's absolutely no going back to how it was. The need was still there, and the innovation behind these tools was developed because that need existed.

crinklechips · 20/11/2025 09:35

Sausagescanfly · 20/11/2025 09:24

Comments like Tice's appeal to people who are unable to imagine that raising different children may come with different challenges and outcomes to raising their own.

I've had a few cracking comments about my ND child, the issues she has and the fairly small accommodations we make so that life runs more smoothly. Apparently if she had been raised by her Brownie leader she'd eat everything offered and my mum would have told her to pay more attention at school, so she now wouldn't have ADHD.

There is a sad but beautiful irony that it is the people who struggle to put themselves in others shoes who are against ND children having adaptations to improve their experiences and outcomes.

Oh yes that irony strikes me all the time! If more people were as considerate and empathetic as my AuDHD DS the world would be a better place!

LadyKenya · 20/11/2025 09:41

twilightermummy · 19/11/2025 20:51

This really scares me. I've already started becoming wary about the lanyard my son wears stating that he has ADHD and autism so his behaviour may be different in public. Both my children with SEN wear their ear defenders and not only in school. It's almost like there's a change in the air and I can feel people tutting at, well, everything now it would seem.

Remain started off with illegal migrants and now they're coming for everyone who isn't a white male? Women spout their support for them yet abortion rights are being touted as as a national conversation. Even painkillers during pregnancy causes autism according to Farage's best bud. We're sleepwalking into this with the media as the pied piper. Horrible times.

Exactly this. People would do well to remember this, when they are showing support for the Reform Party. They are not only racist, but ablelist too. God help these groups of people, if they ever get into power.

Portlypig · 20/11/2025 09:55

Notonthestairs · 20/11/2025 08:26

Yes, I have no doubt that Reform are positioning SEN kids as the reason they cant cut tax. Much like single parents were pilloried in the 1980s. It always comes back to tax.
(Lets not mention that Brexit knocked 6-8% off GDP - the real problem is support for kids)

But tax makes the country run. It might be unpalatable in a way, but it’s true. Unless you’re willing to work for free you can’t criticise others for wanting to be paid.

Didwesayitall · 20/11/2025 09:56

Portlypig · 20/11/2025 08:12

I don’t think anyone would look at a nonverbal 8 year old who can’t use a toilet independently and say ‘not disabled/autistic’.

But the autism symptom net is wider every day. And as they say ‘if you’ve met one person with autism you’ve met one person with autism’. I don’t really believe a very sociable professional 40 year old with a late in life diagnosis has the same condition as the aforementioned non verbal 8 year old, but it’s all called ‘autism’ nonetheless.

The human brain is so incredibly complex I think it’s all but impossible to actually take 2 people and say their conditions are exactly the same thing if their symptoms show little overlap.

Plus the rise of anxiety etc contributing to autistic presentation.

It's not from one extreme to the other. There are those of us in our 40s who were non verbal as kids and have since become semi verbal/selective mutism (Some are completely verbal too). We struggle with verbal speech, self care, hygiene, food, etc but can use the bathroom and toilet independently.

Some of us are awfully isolated due to constant overstimulation and dysregulation when in regular contact with the outside world. Also struggle with differences in communication, interaction often due to extremely restricted interests and mixed signal communication from the general public where people don't often say what they mean or mean what they say.

Online is where you'll see most of us; we can dip in and out as we can cope with, and can take enough time to write, edit and sift what we want to say rather than the on-demand style of irl interactions where words are difficult to form constantly.

Some of us have such high potential because we are very intelligent and have been told this since childhood but it's not easy to navigate the world and other humans. We "fail" at school, work and socialisation because of overstimulation as well as constantly either feeling like aliens among other people or being made to feel that way inadvertently by them. Some of us are struggling because we're trapped inside our bodies and wish we could move around the world easily and as expected but such is life.

You'd see me and not know any of these things until we start having a conversation (if we do and if i happen to be able to speak/say more than the cursory hello and smile) or you spend a day with me. Then you'd start thinking that something is off but won't be able to put your finger on it till you're told.

To stop the odd looks and confusing stares I get 99% of the time irl because of this, I let people know right off the bat that I'm autistic or I wear my lanyard. It helps them make sense of me and whatever they may have picked up on as odd, weird or annoying. I find that most people are more patient and understanding irl when I do this. I've seen some disapproving looks too but what can you do?!

Didwesayitall · 20/11/2025 10:06

Owly11 · 20/11/2025 08:06

Yes, but a diagnosis is also a label. And unfortunately society then sees that person through that label and the person themselves also comes to see themselves through the label and it can become limiting. We are all complex people and we could all have multiple labels - some of them diagnoses, some of them physical or sex characteristics, some of them roles. I personally am strongly in favour of living life at a factual/descriptive level eg 'I find noise overwhelming' than at a conceptual/diagnostic/labelling level 'i have hyperacusis' wherever possible. It is less dehumanising and static and more connecting and relatable and is more likely to promote acceptance of natural human variation and differences. Just my opinion.

The problem with this is that without being formally recognised, many people will invalidate your struggle. You'll get called "precious", "hardwork", etc when you say you struggle with such and such or can't handle this or that. You're told to try and that you can push yourself. You decide to do just that to pacify people around you and make them less uncomfortable with you but end up with significant mental health challenges because you pushed yourself past what your brain and nervous system can handle.

When you've lived your life being invalidated, unsupported, unrecognised and dismissed as too sensitive, too this, too that, you of course feel the need to seek diagnosis even as an adult by yourself for something you know you've struggled with your whole life but managed to not let it affect others as much due to masking and self isolation.

Not recognising, acknowledging and accepting adult struggles unless formally diagnosed is what's dehumanising and silencing for some of us.

Notonthestairs · 20/11/2025 10:19

Portlypig · 20/11/2025 09:55

But tax makes the country run. It might be unpalatable in a way, but it’s true. Unless you’re willing to work for free you can’t criticise others for wanting to be paid.

Reducing support and accomodations for SN kids will not reduce the tax burden. It is a false economy. You would simply push issues further down the line. Supporting kids to get the best outcomes they possibly can whilst at school (and in a suitable enviroment) is an investment in their future and that of the nation.

Teanbiscuits33 · 20/11/2025 10:20

It won’t stop there either, they have gone after asylum seekers, now this. They will be forcing as many disabled people as possible in to work, regardless of their ability to do so, which is partly why Reform want to remove all DEI and workers rights, slash welfare and leave the ECHR. Disabled people will have not a leg to stand on (no pun intended) in either work or education.

Then after that, they will go after gay rights and marriage, then it will be someone else. They always need a scapegoat. It’s depressing.

I don’t know which is worse, either that so many people don’t see what’s happening, or don’t care.

It’s not reform, it’s regression.

YourFirmLimeHam · 20/11/2025 10:23

What i dont understand is how the whole party can be behind something like SEND cuts when SEND affects everyone, irrespective of class, race or nationality. I don't really know who this guy is, but the chances of him having a child, nephew, niece or even sibling with SEND is very high. The cuts affect everyone, regardless of class/wealth because the less you get from the system, the more you may feel compelled to "top up" from the private system.

BillieWiper · 20/11/2025 10:28

Well yeah, Reform are massively ableist.

In other news, the earth is round..

Portlypig · 20/11/2025 10:29

Teanbiscuits33 · 20/11/2025 10:20

It won’t stop there either, they have gone after asylum seekers, now this. They will be forcing as many disabled people as possible in to work, regardless of their ability to do so, which is partly why Reform want to remove all DEI and workers rights, slash welfare and leave the ECHR. Disabled people will have not a leg to stand on (no pun intended) in either work or education.

Then after that, they will go after gay rights and marriage, then it will be someone else. They always need a scapegoat. It’s depressing.

I don’t know which is worse, either that so many people don’t see what’s happening, or don’t care.

It’s not reform, it’s regression.

But we can’t keep going with 5 million on disability benefits. We just can’t. This is treated as an emotional rather than a financial matter on here when it isn’t.

Portlypig · 20/11/2025 10:33

YourFirmLimeHam · 20/11/2025 10:23

What i dont understand is how the whole party can be behind something like SEND cuts when SEND affects everyone, irrespective of class, race or nationality. I don't really know who this guy is, but the chances of him having a child, nephew, niece or even sibling with SEND is very high. The cuts affect everyone, regardless of class/wealth because the less you get from the system, the more you may feel compelled to "top up" from the private system.

Because it isn’t a binary choice between hating people with SEN, or wanting us to throw the kitchen sink at it with no financial limit and just keep going as we are.

I’m in the middle. I absolutely do not want SEN support scrapped, but I think we are spending increasingly excessive amounts on SEN with no change in outcomes and a system still in ‘crisis’.

We need to reduce the amount spent and spend it in a way that actually meets people’s needs.

SilenceInside · 20/11/2025 10:36

@Portlypig of course it's an emotional matter. You are talking about my child. My vulnerable child. It is also a financial matter, of course it is. I am very happy to pay tax to pay for properly funded services that are well run. I get that many people don't want to contribute in that way, and are happy to let people fend for themselves or survive off any charitable services they can access. That's a political choice.

Fearfulsaints · 20/11/2025 10:36

Portlypig · 20/11/2025 10:29

But we can’t keep going with 5 million on disability benefits. We just can’t. This is treated as an emotional rather than a financial matter on here when it isn’t.

Well wearing ear defenders is going to increase the chance of succes in education and then work.

So they might have to decide if they can cope with seeing ear defenders or want less educated people and more homeless people (as they dont like benefits)

ColdToesandWarmHeart · 20/11/2025 10:37

They’re such fucking idiots.

It makes absolutely no difference to anyone, at all. It doesn’t affect schools, they don’t stop kids hearing the teachers. They’re a bunch of cunts

SleeplessInWherever · 20/11/2025 10:38

Sausagescanfly · 20/11/2025 09:24

Comments like Tice's appeal to people who are unable to imagine that raising different children may come with different challenges and outcomes to raising their own.

I've had a few cracking comments about my ND child, the issues she has and the fairly small accommodations we make so that life runs more smoothly. Apparently if she had been raised by her Brownie leader she'd eat everything offered and my mum would have told her to pay more attention at school, so she now wouldn't have ADHD.

There is a sad but beautiful irony that it is the people who struggle to put themselves in others shoes who are against ND children having adaptations to improve their experiences and outcomes.

A woman in a playground, who I promise we’d never encountered before in our lives, once told us that our son would be less autistic if we’d given him raw carrots.

Just out of nowhere “have you tried vegetables?”

Teanbiscuits33 · 20/11/2025 10:39

Portlypig · 20/11/2025 10:29

But we can’t keep going with 5 million on disability benefits. We just can’t. This is treated as an emotional rather than a financial matter on here when it isn’t.

If five million people (not even sure this figure is accurate?) are entitled to disability benefits, then yes we can go on. In a civilised society, we should not be punishing and scapegoating those with disabilities.

Those who are making you believe there are fraudulent claims left, right and centre don’t have the first idea about anything and shouldn’t be making political decisions or having discussions about things they are clueless about.

Not everyone with disabilities claims PIP, which has nothing to do with work anyway.

And a great point a pp just made - not giving disabled people adequate support through education isn’t going to bode well for them transitioning into work. The general public are woefully short sighted on these issues.

Portlypig · 20/11/2025 10:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.