Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Can someone explain to me why/how the Labour government has directly made them worse off in the last 15 months?

628 replies

MotherofAdults · 04/11/2025 09:05

Can someone explain to me why/how the Labour government has directly made them worse off in the last 15 months? I see this claim a lot on these pages, but I don't understand why. Sorry if I sound stupid, I am just trying to get clear.

I totally understand that the cost of living keeps going up - that inflation keeps rising (3.5-3.8%?) and that mortgage interest remains relatively high, but I don't understand why or how this is the fault of the current government? What have/haven't they done? Are people angry that they haven't curbed inflation? What should they be doing?

If we could avoid mentioning the things that didn't actually happen (eg the Winter Fuel Allowence cuts) and speculation about what the next budget will do (doubling of council tax, rise in minimum wage etc), that would be really helpful. I am looking for actual changes made by this that have directly affected your financial situation since Labour got it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
samthepigeon · 04/11/2025 13:29

RoostingHens · 04/11/2025 09:38

NI increase on employees affects us all, increases costs that are passed onto consumers including though increases in cost of living. Minimum wage increases does the same (though clearly a benefit to those on minimum wage). It is enough to cause businesses to shut reducing employment etc.

The fifty billion pounds that it will cost to rent the Chagos after giving them away will no longer be able to be spent on public services/will need to be funded from tax.

Failure to stop immigration comes at a cost - £15 billion pa to house them again which must be paid for from money that either needs to be raised/borrowed or cannot be spent on other services. Plus the impact of a load of young single men from misogynistic countries without any checks being placed in communities.

The inability to deal with ‘Gaza’ marchers and their open antiseminitism increasing division in society.

The spend on asylum seekers has been going on for years, so is that a cost that has increased with this government that will make us individually feel worse off? The last point isn't an economic thing, though I do agree not everything is about money. It is worth noting that there are plenty of areas completely unaffected by marches or the clash of people supporting/opposing Israel.

KingOfPoundbury · 04/11/2025 13:30

The withdrawal of the Winter Fuel Payment.

As a consquence one had to turn the heating down to 10° degrees in the servants quarters.

I think they coped, one was not notified of any problems, like pipes freezing or anything serious.

AnareticDegree · 04/11/2025 13:32

RoostingHens · 04/11/2025 13:18

Labour has failed to reverse the terrible Tory decision to loosen oversight of councils. National government must be directly responsible for controlling local authorities effectively, otherwise democracy is undermined and the corrupt local council executives run riot, as has happened in my area.

We vote for councils. If we hand councils to national governments then we are removing local democracy. The problem is people are so tribal in who they vote for that they fail to vote against corrupt local councils because they ‘have always voted Labour’.

Agree about the voters, nowhere is this more true than my town.

Democracy has many levels. I don't mean "hand the councils back". I mean have effective oversight, checks and balances. At the moment there are none on my council. It literally does what it likes, fucks things up, awards itself huge salaries and then wastes more money on "consultations" which are then ignored.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Comefromaway · 04/11/2025 13:34

Upstartled · 04/11/2025 13:14

We need to do a lot of things, prioritise the young is one of them, increasing business, enterprise, and productivity too, we need to change the mood of the country - demoralised people don't spend their money, or improve their situation, they just hoard it to keep them safe. We need to cut welfare, as well. There are heaps of things.

100% agree

dementedmummy · 04/11/2025 13:35

MotherofAdults · 04/11/2025 09:05

Can someone explain to me why/how the Labour government has directly made them worse off in the last 15 months? I see this claim a lot on these pages, but I don't understand why. Sorry if I sound stupid, I am just trying to get clear.

I totally understand that the cost of living keeps going up - that inflation keeps rising (3.5-3.8%?) and that mortgage interest remains relatively high, but I don't understand why or how this is the fault of the current government? What have/haven't they done? Are people angry that they haven't curbed inflation? What should they be doing?

If we could avoid mentioning the things that didn't actually happen (eg the Winter Fuel Allowence cuts) and speculation about what the next budget will do (doubling of council tax, rise in minimum wage etc), that would be really helpful. I am looking for actual changes made by this that have directly affected your financial situation since Labour got it.

Currently Made it most expensive to hire staff due to changes to employer ni threshold

Future
Inheritance tax about to hit employers and farmers hard from 6 April 2026 which will likely result in a fire sale of certain businesses and loss of jobs.
Pensions about to drag estates not presently subject to inheritance tax right into the inheritance tax frame

Onmytod24 · 04/11/2025 13:36

SushiForMe · 04/11/2025 13:28

Well of course, who would pay an extra 12k a year and be happy with the govt who made it happen?
Even if you think the change was right, you can’t expect people to not be unhappy about such an extra expense.

They’ve got the option to move to state schools. I would like to see all private schools closed down they just perpetuate the elitism of this country.

Fearfulsaints · 04/11/2025 13:39

I lost one of my jobs because the additional of VAT into school fees and loss of business rates relief and NIC increase, meant redundancies had to be made.

Onmytod24 · 04/11/2025 13:40

2dogsandabudgie · 04/11/2025 10:44

You sound jealous. Did you want to send your children to a private school but couldn't afford to, so now hate anyone else who does?

Schools that make millions are not a charity the predicted closing of private schools never happens these people had the money.

Barso · 04/11/2025 13:40

Rise in NI meant my employer could only give me a tiny below inflation payrise, yet my bills have risen. A team leader left but I can't apply for his job as it has been scrapped to save money, so I'm unable to progress. I'm 4 weeks from payday, the bills I have gone out and I have hardly anything left from my wages.

squidsin · 04/11/2025 13:41

The main problem has been that the NI increases have led to job losses. I do think that was ill judged - however all the major retailers/corporations are still posting massive profits so they haven't been hit that hard. Smaller businesses are worse affected, also by the rise in minimum wage, which is having the knock-on effect of making it hard for younger people to find work.

But in terms of the Labour government making life more expensive for everyone - they're not. Inflation isn't really something governments can hugely control. The knock-on effect of printing loads of money during Covid is still an issue there. (That was the Tories, just stating the obvious). The last government made everything fucking shit - years and years of zero growth and decimating public services and economic stagnation followed by a Covid crash and the Ukraine war hitting the economy - and they've got a huge job in trying to stop the economy from collapsing completely as a result.

RoyalImpatience · 04/11/2025 13:41

My work has to find around 800 hundred thousand in NI payments so we got a 1 % raise

1457bloom · 04/11/2025 13:44

By giving above inflation pay rises to government workers including nhs etc, they have just perpetuated the inflation for everyone.

YYURYYUCICYYUR4ME · 04/11/2025 13:44

The organisation I worked for made significant redundancies, based on staffing costs.

Another76543 · 04/11/2025 13:46

BloominNora · 04/11/2025 13:27

Are you being deliberately obtuse. Of course I wouldn't take someone's passport off them if they wanted to move abroad. Only if they want to move abroad AND not pay any tax.

The US do it. If you want to remain a US citizen you have to continue to pay tax even if you live outside the US. Why couldn't we do the same?

You wouldn't lose 30% of tax revenue because not everyone would leave (and actually under a.60% higher tax bracket, its only around 0.5% of earners would be affected). You could set the 60% threshold at £265,000 - which is 99.5% of the population and below.

Even fewer would leave if the ability to make money in the UK is easier and more beneficial for those who are based here.

You would increase tax revenue from VAT and increased company profits as people would have more disposable income - and people earning less than £150,000 spend a much higher proportion of their income of day to day costs which would make up some of any shortfall from people leaving and the economy would grow which would make up the rest.

Things like the benefits bill and health services bill would also reduce as improved services meant people were healthier, again, making up some of the shortfall from any loss in tax benefits.

Its about looking at the bigger picture rather than falling for the scare tactics which the uber wealthy like to employ so that they can keep getting rich off the back of the rest of us!

Are you being deliberately obtuse. Of course I wouldn't take someone's passport off them if they wanted to move abroad.

You said “And as for the ones who want to move, theu can fill their boots - but they would have to give up their British Citizenship if they dont want to pay tax.”.

The US do it. If you want to remain a US citizen you have to continue to pay tax even if you live outside the US

A quick Google tells you this is nonsense. The US tax system is much more complicated than that.

You wouldn't lose 30% of tax revenue because not everyone would leave

I didn’t say they would. I said “Even a relatively small amount leaving would have a huge impact on the tax take.”

Things like the benefits bill and health services bill would also reduce as improved services meant people were healthier, again, making up some of the shortfall from any loss in tax benefits.

How would services improve if the tax take falls? Where would the funding for improved services come from? Your reasoning doesn’t make sense. You’d lose VAT from people leaving (wealthier people have more disposable income so tend to spend more on items subject to VAT). No one with any basic understanding of simple economics and maths can think that bringing in policies encouraging those that contribute the most to the tax system to leave will improve the economic situation in the UK.

EHCPerhaps · 04/11/2025 13:49

It’s VAT in school fees for me too. SEND kid, EHCP. DC can’t attend any other school for various reasons. Local authority won’t accept financial responsibility or provide a state school alternative that’s suitable. Year long wait for tribunal.

I’d sadly add (as a lifelong Labour voter) that the current Labour Party appear to have no vision for education, SEND or otherwise. No big budget increases and a lot of lies about how taxing education is good for the country and will recruit extra teachers. In reality: it’s not raising that much money and it’s causing school closures particularly of small, rural and primary age private schools, which loses precious jobs in a small local economy. Private schools covers alternative schools like Steiner, religious faith schools and single sex schools, and special skills schools like dance or music. It’s not better for us as a country to tax those out of existence.

It’s also causing flight of pupils to state schools, putting pressure on places for those, especially for bright kids who can’t afford private. It’s really pressurizing state SEND provision (lots of kids at private school are/were there because they have SEND). The effects aren’t evenly spread across the country. The big old very establishment private schools (for boys) that were established centuries ago are completely unruffled by this - more of the parents are very wealthy to absorb it and if they have big building projects the schools can actually reclaim the VAT back on them and recoup money from the taxpayer.
NI increases are also affecting schools whose highest outgoing costs are staff costs.

But some posters will carry on being mean about other people’s kids having to leave their private schools. or other people’s kids state schools having an accommodate more and more kids shrinking the catchment and displacing their own kids, and stretching the SEND budget even further. They’re all right Jack.

Another76543 · 04/11/2025 13:53

RoostingHens · 04/11/2025 13:22

Though, tbf, there would be even less on PAYE if income tax for that bracket went up.

Well yes. Experience has shown that increasing tax merely encourages the wealthiest to find new ways of avoiding it altogether. It’s like CGT. Prior to the introduction of taper relief in 1998, entrepreneurs would often arrange their affairs so that gains were realised when they were subject to tax in another country (eg by moving). They simply were not happy with paying high rates of CGT. They often avoided UK tax altogether. When UK rates were lowered, they were often happy to stay here and pay some UK tax. The UK is better off getting a lower rate of tax than none at all.

placemats · 04/11/2025 13:54

On jobs in my area feed there's a position in a hospice, head of retail, that brings with it a salary of £45,521 - £52,092 per year. Yet hospices have moaned about the NI rise for it's workers, who earn minimum wage.

Crikeyalmighty · 04/11/2025 13:56

@RoostingHens I have no idea of the mechanics of it but it is actually correct info - it’s fully offsetable against corp tax - I’m sure an accountant on here might have a better idea in which instances the gvt actually make more revenue from it - it’s the same with a lot of taxes, employer pension contributions etc

PeninsulaOfDoom · 04/11/2025 13:59

Onmytod24 · 04/11/2025 13:40

Schools that make millions are not a charity the predicted closing of private schools never happens these people had the money.

Schools that make millions pay corporation tax, the only tax advantage they had was business rate relief. The closing of private schools did happen and will continue to happen until Labour are out in a few years.Who are ‘these’ people with the money? Do you mean parents?

You’ve confused lots of different things, Labour have introduced VAT on education and vocational training of children. I do think it’s worth understanding policies before commenting

Crikeyalmighty · 04/11/2025 14:04

squidsin · 04/11/2025 13:41

The main problem has been that the NI increases have led to job losses. I do think that was ill judged - however all the major retailers/corporations are still posting massive profits so they haven't been hit that hard. Smaller businesses are worse affected, also by the rise in minimum wage, which is having the knock-on effect of making it hard for younger people to find work.

But in terms of the Labour government making life more expensive for everyone - they're not. Inflation isn't really something governments can hugely control. The knock-on effect of printing loads of money during Covid is still an issue there. (That was the Tories, just stating the obvious). The last government made everything fucking shit - years and years of zero growth and decimating public services and economic stagnation followed by a Covid crash and the Ukraine war hitting the economy - and they've got a huge job in trying to stop the economy from collapsing completely as a result.

As I mentioned before Employers NI is offsetable against corp tax due as a deductible expense - minimum wage though I think can make more difference as although again ‘wages paid’ are offsetable , it’s only really offsetable if you are making enough profit to pay significant corporation tax and unless you have good cash reserves can impact quickly on cash flow as you ‘have to pay wages when due’ and hence you either have to factor it into profit reduction or charge customers/clients more. technically you do pay employers NI too when it’s due , but a lot of companies do fudge it and pay in chunks and not always bang on time - which is why when you see companies books go under they often owe significant amounts in both employee deducted taxes ( that they haven’t yet paid over) as well as employer NI, corporation tax, VAT etc - there are an awful lot of private companies run on a knife edge ( and employees are oblivious too )

Sunshineismyfavourite · 04/11/2025 14:05

Helloautumnagain · 04/11/2025 09:17

I can see the point re NI but don’t understand the tax threshold comment as this was actually set by the previous government?

This is the problem. We are led to believe that a new government will mean better things for us when in fact it's just more of the same. Constant arguing, blame and one-upmanship between the two main parties which is hugely tedious and just sends us around in circles.
I think a coalition government with the best people from all of the parties in key roles (still considering who they might be!) is the only way I can see us getting out of the mess we are in - by pulling together. It's absolutely crazy.

Bloozie · 04/11/2025 14:06

I’m a business owner. The national insurance increase hasn’t been helpful and my business is struggling generally due to the economic landscape. I have taken a pay cut and I am, measurably and considerably, poorer.

I don’t blame the Labour government though. My business would have gone under without the furlough payments during the pandemic and I don’t consider business to be exempt from helping dig the country out of the hole we are in. People have very short memories. The pandemic cost a lot of money. The war in Ukraine is continuing to hurt us all financially. Anyone blaming the Labour government is blinded by ideology. I don’t love this government. But they’re doing an ok job of the economy, all things considered. That none of us is materially feeling rich yet is just impatience and naivety.

DeftWasp · 04/11/2025 14:06

MotherofAdults · 04/11/2025 09:05

Can someone explain to me why/how the Labour government has directly made them worse off in the last 15 months? I see this claim a lot on these pages, but I don't understand why. Sorry if I sound stupid, I am just trying to get clear.

I totally understand that the cost of living keeps going up - that inflation keeps rising (3.5-3.8%?) and that mortgage interest remains relatively high, but I don't understand why or how this is the fault of the current government? What have/haven't they done? Are people angry that they haven't curbed inflation? What should they be doing?

If we could avoid mentioning the things that didn't actually happen (eg the Winter Fuel Allowence cuts) and speculation about what the next budget will do (doubling of council tax, rise in minimum wage etc), that would be really helpful. I am looking for actual changes made by this that have directly affected your financial situation since Labour got it.

Main gripe from me is I am seeing nothing from my money, and promises are being broken.

Last year Reeves & Co clawed in billions for the exchequer on the promise it was "once in a generation", now, 13 months on she's back for more, having pissed that up against the wall.

And next year it will be the same, and repeat - until she or her successors actually run out of OUR money.

The ONLY way the economy can grow is to sell goods / services / crops to other economies as well as "in house" - we are not doing that, more is rushing out than coming in - its an impossible leak to fix, even for a competent crowd, and I see no competence on either side of the house.

It only ends when we are all skint, and even then there is no way out of the financial vortex.

GloriaMonday · 04/11/2025 14:07

Sunshineismyfavourite · 04/11/2025 14:05

This is the problem. We are led to believe that a new government will mean better things for us when in fact it's just more of the same. Constant arguing, blame and one-upmanship between the two main parties which is hugely tedious and just sends us around in circles.
I think a coalition government with the best people from all of the parties in key roles (still considering who they might be!) is the only way I can see us getting out of the mess we are in - by pulling together. It's absolutely crazy.

You are joking. Don't you remember the last one?

BumpyWinds · 04/11/2025 14:07

Rollercoaster1920 · 04/11/2025 09:16

The increase in NI and minimum wage have massively affected business owners. My family are impacted by this.

The anti-business approach by the government (the above plus generally not cutting costs so the UK economy outlook is getting worse) is affecting my job. I'm private sector, and expecting redundancy in the new year because companies are not seeing growth so are not investing in new things.

Plus holding all tax thresholds whilst inflation is highish means they are taking relatively more of my wages all the time.

For me, it's this. We work with businesses who are all looking to cut costs because their wage bill has increased, so that means our income is reducing. In addition, our own NI bill went up by 20% also. Plus corporation tax was put up by the Tories.

As a result, we, and many of our clients, are reducing headcount, either by redundancy or by not replacing staff that have left.

We're very much going into a contraction phase and sitting it out. Not exactly boosting the economy!

Swipe left for the next trending thread