Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread gallery
140
TooBigForMyBoots · 20/11/2025 14:20

RafaistheKingofClay · 19/11/2025 23:32

Who would have foreseen the completely inexperienced prosecution team Trump hired making a cock up this catastrophic?

Anyone remember when Trump threatened to sue law firms and they settled, agreeing to millions of $ in pro-bono work instead of paying out cash?

I do. And I'm loving their work so far.😁

LlttledrummergirI · 20/11/2025 14:29

I hope Trump burns in hell for eternity.

Hear hear.

Clearly secrets are his thing- despicable excuse of human being.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 20/11/2025 15:40

Why isn’t that treason by Trump?

SerendipityJane · 20/11/2025 15:50

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 20/11/2025 15:40

Why isn’t that treason by Trump?

Because POTUS is immune from criminal prosecution.

DuncinToffee · 20/11/2025 15:53

Especially after Jan 6th, Mike Pence might recall similar sentiments.

AcrossthePond55 · 20/11/2025 16:05

DuncinToffee · 20/11/2025 08:33

https://bsky.app/profile/hhesterm.bsky.social/post/3m62ccycnfk22

So… the Epstein File Transparency Act has this exception. What can go wrong….

And I'm sure he has the EOs sitting on his desk right now. To be signed immediately after the Epstein Resolution.

Anything mentioning or alluding to his name will never be released. Nor will anything containing the name(s) of any of his most staunch loyalists. The unimportant loyalists better watch out, they'll be thrown to the wolves as 'proof' there's not a coverup'.

The claim of 'national security' etc will mean that the general public never actually sees what they're claiming is so 'dangerous' to the Country. And anyone who does is also silenced fearing prosecution Once again I cry to the universe, "O where is Deep Throat when we need him/her?"

No wonder he agreed to sign. I wonder if this was in the original Resolution or was quietly added later. And if so, who proposed it and why?

SerendipityJane · 20/11/2025 16:12

Interesting suggestion that the BBC outrage is what has started damaging Trump

(I've sent that to the Telegraph news office).

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzfRGGwCYRc

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 20/11/2025 16:24

SerendipityJane · 20/11/2025 15:50

Because POTUS is immune from criminal prosecution.

I thought that was only for things he did when he was in office and that were to do with the office.

In any case, it is treason; it's just that so long as it was done for something relevant to his office, he can't be prosecuted for it.

AcrossthePond55 · 20/11/2025 16:57

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 20/11/2025 16:24

I thought that was only for things he did when he was in office and that were to do with the office.

In any case, it is treason; it's just that so long as it was done for something relevant to his office, he can't be prosecuted for it.

No, a sitting POTUS 'will' not be criminally prosecuted for anything whilst in office, not even murder. Theoretically he'd have to be impeached and removed from office first. That's what saved his bacon from criminal prosecution during his first term. All the prosecutions took place after he left office.

There's no specific law that says they can't be prosecuted whilst in office, but it's long standing DOJ policy (OLC memoranda 1973 & 2000) and let's face it, no sitting POTUS (GOP or Dem) is going to undo that policy, although I can see SCROTUS undoing it as one of his last official acts especially if a Dem wins the 2028 election or if one of his 'enemies' in the GOP does in the hopes it will cause them problems.

The 'in the performance of his duties' regarding misdeeds in office was the huge SCOTUS decision wrt to presidential immunity (Trump vs USA issued 7/1/24). It provides that a POTUS can NEVER be prosecuted for anything if it can be determined it was in the 'performance of his office/duties'. Prior to that decision a POTUS could be tried for crimes in office, that's one of the reasons, if not THE reason, why Nixon 'took the deal' and resigned over Watergate. This decision is what set SCROTUS up for all the shit he's pulling now; prosecution of his 'enemies', dirty deals with Russia & Saudi, and the many moneymaking schemes he and his family are doing. He's banking on everything being determined to be 'in the performance of his duties', which is a pretty loose term.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 20/11/2025 17:01

I see, Across. Thanks.

SerendipityJane · 20/11/2025 17:11

The 'in the performance of his duties' regarding misdeeds in office was the huge SCOTUS decision wrt to presidential immunity (Trump vs USA issued 7/1/24). It provides that a POTUS can NEVER be prosecuted for anything if it can be determined it was in the 'performance of his office/duties'.

Something which has never been the case in the England whose tyranny the Yanks made suck a fucking big deal of rebelling against in 1776 in their bid to avoid paying any tax

The ultimate demonstration of not being above the law in England rests squarely on the shoulders of Charles Stuart (see what I did there ?). Whose trial is still commentated on by US law professors to this day.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 20/11/2025 17:39

Do they know he walked and talked Half an hour after his head was cut off?

I'm not sure what law he actually broke and was executed under. Was it simply "waging war against the parliament and the people of England"? (Which seems to me to be debatable cause, unless the words "and losing" are added at the end.) Or had he been declared to be a tyrant as well? I didn't actually know we had laws against either of those things: prescient of the law-makers to know in advance that we would need them for a king, really. Or maybe they made them up on the hoof, as it were.

TooBigForMyBoots · 20/11/2025 17:52

DuncinToffee · 17/11/2025 18:53

This is embarrassing Envy

The Trump administration wants you to stop watching the BBC and watch GB News instead. Meanwhile this is what passes for “journalism” on GB News…

https://bsky.app/profile/stopfundinghate.bsky.social/post/3m5trz5tzus2q

Did you see KL's face when Bev Turner asked the first question the other night? Turner made an arse of herself, KL gave her the sort of look a snake gives its prey.

KGBN parted ways with journalism as soon as its was launched.

SerendipityJane · 20/11/2025 19:17

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 20/11/2025 17:39

Do they know he walked and talked Half an hour after his head was cut off?

I'm not sure what law he actually broke and was executed under. Was it simply "waging war against the parliament and the people of England"? (Which seems to me to be debatable cause, unless the words "and losing" are added at the end.) Or had he been declared to be a tyrant as well? I didn't actually know we had laws against either of those things: prescient of the law-makers to know in advance that we would need them for a king, really. Or maybe they made them up on the hoof, as it were.

It was very specifically (and controversially) treason. He broke his coronation oath. (Or so the court decided).

A lot to go over in that, but it happened. And - parliament being supreme - it doesn't matter what anyone thinks about it.

DuncinToffee · 20/11/2025 19:39

According to Leavitt, calling a reporter "piggy" was just Trump being honest

Jaichangecentfoisdenom · 20/11/2025 20:33

These people are beyond the pale. Horrific. The Office of the Presidency has been put into such disrepute by this administration, it’s not true.

jumpingthehighjump · 20/11/2025 20:52

Agree

I don't know why I find "Quiet, quiet, Piggy" so insulting, but I do.

And the fact the rest of the press corps didn't say anything makes it one hundred times worse

DontMowMyMeadow · 20/11/2025 21:26

Leavitt is such a piece of work.

placemats · 20/11/2025 21:27

SerendipityJane · 20/11/2025 15:50

Because POTUS is immune from criminal prosecution.

He did famously say that he could shoot a person in the street and not lose voters pre 2016 election?

MO0N · 21/11/2025 12:46

BruceAndNosh · 21/11/2025 00:59

RFK Jr singlehandedly increases future deaths from preventable childhood diseases...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/20/cdc-website-vaccines-autism

RFK is death personified, not the grim reaper rather the dim reaper☹️

DuncinToffee · 21/11/2025 14:57

Sen. Elissa Slotkin tells NBC News that Capitol Police are now with her 24/7.

"We've had hundreds and hundreds, if not closer to 1000 threats come in to our phones, our emails" since Trump threatened her and other Democrats.

Efacsen · 21/11/2025 16:00

And again

Jimmy Kimmel accuses Trump of trying to get him fired and tells him: ‘Quiet, piggy’

Jimmy Kimmel accuses Trump of trying to get him fired and tells him: ‘Quiet, piggy’ | US news | The Guardian

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.