Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread 33 Starmer - Gerst Monath

1000 replies

DuncinToffee · 15/09/2025 19:45

Pull up a chair for some friendly chit chat about politics and beyond

Taxes optional but greatly appreciated.

Previous thread

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5405579-thread-32-starmer-corn-moon?page=40&reply=147167011

OP posts:
Thread gallery
105
DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 12:53

It's the Lib Dem Conference

However

For 56 minutes Sky News and BBC News interrupted everything else and carried a Reform UK feed live, uninterrupted, unchallenged. The stream spluttered, froze, pixelated - dozens of times - still they stuck with it. FOR ONE HOUR.

This is an editorial choice. No other party gets this coverage. ~AA

OP posts:
DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 13:06

That is that employers who need to source labour from overseas should also pay for British workers to be trained to meet those needs.

All parties have a version of this

And Brexit was supposed to deliver it

Instead it delivered the Boris wave of immigration.

OP posts:
Notonthestairs · 22/09/2025 13:06

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 12:49

It's a policy based on false numbers, no matter how well presented.

Both the Financial Times and Guardian are pointing this out.

FT
He also claimed that the changes his party was proposing would save UK taxpayers £234bn over the lifetime of the migrants.

The figure appears to come from a February report produced by rightwing think-tank the Centre for Policy Studies, which subsequently said the fiscal data contained within this report was the “subject of dispute”, meaning that the overall cost estimates should no longer be used.

This kind of detail will be ignored by Mail/BBC/Telegraph.

bombastix · 22/09/2025 13:23

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 13:06

That is that employers who need to source labour from overseas should also pay for British workers to be trained to meet those needs.

All parties have a version of this

And Brexit was supposed to deliver it

Instead it delivered the Boris wave of immigration.

Yes. Reform claim they will do it. I don’t believe them.

Labour should have claimed this ground. They didn’t

placemats · 22/09/2025 13:50

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRMJxozjSTV_Qny11idBDprDzD0DRfhJ-fEunBZsACxtUSm6HHcXWBKfHAYWJYcMEfQespcG6BMWKRq/pub

Link from Jonathan Portes bsky. It's his analysis that explains why the CPS numbers are wrong and that if the figures were right the conclusion would be a long-term fiscal benefit.

The long-run fiscal impact of recent migrants

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRMJxozjSTV_Qny11idBDprDzD0DRfhJ-fEunBZsACxtUSm6HHcXWBKfHAYWJYcMEfQespcG6BMWKRq/pub

MsJinks · 22/09/2025 13:55

At least the pretence that it’s all the asylum seekers’ faults has been stripped bare.
This is so abhorrent and I can’t believe the country I thought was mainly not so bad to muddle along in, though deteriorating lately, is well I don’t know - 3rd world in some ways - shitty waterways and kids with malnutrition looking at you - then like Hitler’s personal wet dream brought to life in others - so sad.
However, until I need DNA tests to check full ancestry I’m ok - can’t imagine what some are feeling and @DuncinToffeeI’m sorry (and ashamed to be a citizen of the U.K. today tbh)
I can’t even think how shite life would be for those left either.
I went to a SUTR meeting yesterday- they said (as many on here have said) - you may not be on the first page of undesirables but you’ll be in that book - so true.
They said we’re not outnumbered but definitely out organised - there’s some seriously good PR and creatives behind both Regorm and Tommy/Advance - slick and integrative campaigns.
I wonder though if this may sway a few away from them - when it actually dies impact their family/friends.
We will see - and I will most definitely keep turning out - later than usual to get activisting! but I really think it’s needed badly.

Goldenbear · 22/09/2025 14:03

bombastix · 22/09/2025 11:26

We may not like Reform but I have just heard Zia Yusuf say something I have agreed with for years. That is that employers who need to source labour from overseas should also pay for British workers to be trained to meet those needs. There is huge amount of wastage of human potential in the UK.

I am not a Reform voter. But this is well calibrated to appeal to people who are struggling for employment. It’s also quite leftist in as much as it burdens businesses so is designed to appeal to Red Wall voters I think.

Don’t get me wrong; I still think this doesn’t mean lots of lovely jobs for British people suddenly generated, but this will have appeal superficially.

How does their concern for the training and employment of British workers marry with their 2024 manifesto pledge;

"Enforce a 2-Strike Rule for Job Offers
All job seekers and those fit to work must find employment within 4 months or accept a job after 2 offers. Otherwise, benefits are withdrawn."

Cuts to benefits and austerity measures never struck me as "leftist".

bombastix · 22/09/2025 14:15

I agree! I think it’s BS. But superficially it hits a need with some of the voters he wants. Labour should have thought similarly and done something already.

Of course they will be contradictory or make it up. But that is politics. Next manifesto, they could say they will pay grants to young working class men to go to university. Would they actually do it?

placemats · 22/09/2025 14:16

The statement from the CPS.

Thread 33 Starmer - Gerst Monath
MsJinks · 22/09/2025 14:19

Looking at threads on here today it’s clearly not worrying enough folk.
Leopards eat faces party - think I’m in an alternate universe.

Piggywaspushed · 22/09/2025 14:32

bombastix · 22/09/2025 10:10

All of this is possible and predictable. It’s repatriation by another name. As if they were worried about asylum seekers as a single issue. It’s all about “legal migration”.

You could change it retrospectively incidentally because not having a British citizenship is an insecure way to be in the UK. ILR is not a right but a legal privilege which can be removed or the terms changed. That can be changed and it is not very complicated to do. Ireland could be an except… after all, doesn’t Robinson have an Irish passport?

Immigration rules can change at any time. They change very often. The safest way is to be a UK citizen and not rely on ILR.

Windrush springs to mind. That went well.

placemats · 22/09/2025 14:41

EU nationals with settled status won't be affected by plan to scrap indefinite leave says Reform, so the concentration is on 40% of those from Iceland, Switzerland and Norway, amongst other countries not within the EU.

Not professional and as slick as an oil spill.

SerendipityJane · 22/09/2025 14:41

Reform are doing well because they can promise the earth and it suits the rich.

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 14:42

placemats · 22/09/2025 14:41

EU nationals with settled status won't be affected by plan to scrap indefinite leave says Reform, so the concentration is on 40% of those from Iceland, Switzerland and Norway, amongst other countries not within the EU.

Not professional and as slick as an oil spill.

This is what they said before

Maybe Farage is a bit worried about his French partner

Thread 33 Starmer - Gerst Monath
OP posts:
MsJinks · 22/09/2025 14:53

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 14:42

This is what they said before

Maybe Farage is a bit worried about his French partner

I mean I hope it won’t, so much, though less than I hope he just doesn’t get in - but the numbers they used to support such a policy have a high proportion of EU folk I believe - confusing (or not really just concerning folk fall for it all)

placemats · 22/09/2025 14:54

The title of the crap immigration plans brochure, which has no basis in reality, is "Prioritising UK Citizens". Sounds like UK citizens are next in line. "An autonomous collective/anarcho-syndicalist commune" springs to mind.

PandoraSocks · 22/09/2025 15:04

Christ, there are some heartless twats on MN. It is very depressing.

placemats · 22/09/2025 15:09

They are heartless because they don't actually exist. And, if they do exist, then their raison d'etre is to wind people up - so therefore also heartless.

LittleBowSheep · 22/09/2025 15:36

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 12:53

It's the Lib Dem Conference

However

For 56 minutes Sky News and BBC News interrupted everything else and carried a Reform UK feed live, uninterrupted, unchallenged. The stream spluttered, froze, pixelated - dozens of times - still they stuck with it. FOR ONE HOUR.

This is an editorial choice. No other party gets this coverage. ~AA

I refuse to watch them, I won't add to their viewing figures.

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 16:20

Very likely Piggy

OP posts:
itsgettingweird · 22/09/2025 16:30

Notonthestairs · 22/09/2025 09:34

I suppose they are aiming to get rid of the NHS anyway. So its fits in the larger picture.

Excellent point. The easiest way to collapse the NHs to to get rid of its workforce 🤬

I was pleased though to hear it described as “Boris wave” with all the extra migration and not being blamed on Labour.

Not that im against immigration - I know we need it - but because im fed up of headlines about labour “open boarders” when they’ve actually reduced immigration (time will tell if that’s had a negative effect or not)

itsgettingweird · 22/09/2025 16:40

DuncinToffee · 22/09/2025 11:13

Ed Davey

Maybe we should call them Farage's Brexit Boats

I loved listening to Ed Davey in the rounds this morning. His communication was clear and his stance was clear.

He’s setting himself up nicely to be the centric party vote at the next GE.

PandoraSocks · 22/09/2025 17:01

itsgettingweird · 22/09/2025 16:40

I loved listening to Ed Davey in the rounds this morning. His communication was clear and his stance was clear.

He’s setting himself up nicely to be the centric party vote at the next GE.

It is a shame he doesn't get even half as much airtime as Farage.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.