Yes. I did.
The mother’s phone records were not phone bills which are presented in time that’s local to the seevice user. They were generated from mim calling up the phone provider several years later, most phone companies operate in UTC, so in all likelihood the print off was the raw data rather than the adjusted times provided in actial phone bills.
Cheshire police bever verified with the phone provider.
At least four accounts all line up, mother’s is an hour early - either we completely take leave of our senses and believe that mum saw blood at 9pm and was told to go back to the ward and wait, made the call to her husband at 10:52pm where husband also says this was a joint call with midwife also speaking to him telling him he needs to get to the hospital because she had looked into her crystal ball and knew the NNU was going to call at 11:30pm (midwife notes and agreed witness statement) telling midwife to tell mum that she needed to come down in 30 minutes, and then mum and midwife sit and wait for the predicted 11:30pm call from the NNU, and then mim and midwife (both agreed in their timing) head down to the NNU at approx midnight
or
We accept that the only time that can possibly be wrong is mothers, derived from requested call times from phone company that weren’t derived from a phone bill, because we all know that it’s not possible for the midwife to have predicted a call from the NNU would happen at 11:30pm so she goes into the mother approx 10:45ish PN to tell mum so that she and mim both end up speaking to dad at 10:52pm on the same phone (fathers statement - midwife spoke to him on the mums phone) to tell him that at 11:30pm the NNU will call and say theres a problem and parents need to attend.
The most likely explanation for this is not that anyone is lying, but that mother’s phone records are incorrect.