Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Lucy Letby - programme on ITV now

559 replies

Viviennemary · 03/08/2025 23:19

I think this must be a new programme and not a repeat. Experts are being wheeled out to try and say Letby is innocent. I'm not convinced at all. None of them were even at the trial or worked with Letby. It's all theories and opinions..

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
Firefly1987 · 15/08/2025 20:07

Insanityisnotastrategy · 15/08/2025 19:50

It's been explained to you in detail that there was absolutely nothing sinister about the photo and the baby was unharmed.

Wow just wow at your addiction to misinformation.

Go explain it to the parents then-see how it goes down.

PinkTonic · 15/08/2025 20:10

Firefly1987 · 15/08/2025 20:07

Go explain it to the parents then-see how it goes down.

They’re fine, they got whatever they wanted from contacting the press .

Firefly1987 · 15/08/2025 20:10

Viviennemary · 15/08/2025 16:24

Everything she does is being defended. Maybe she is just extra kind. Maybe this maybe that. Maybe she is a serial killer who has been found guilty.

Exactly. Anything but what's right in front of them! The mental gymnastics, I just can't.

kkloo · 15/08/2025 20:15

Firefly1987 · 15/08/2025 20:10

Exactly. Anything but what's right in front of them! The mental gymnastics, I just can't.

I don't think you understand what the term 'mental gymnastics' means.

You must have just heard it somewhere and thought it sounded good. It does not apply here, people are providing you with logical, valid and reasonable answers and explanations to things, no mental gymnastics are needed for that.

SnakesAndArrows · 15/08/2025 20:25

Firefly1987 · 15/08/2025 19:29

Well I'm not a nurse I'm not an expert on all the kinds of breathing equipment a baby would need-I'm just going by the article. I agree it could've been clearer regarding what was actually removed. The parents seemed to think it should never have happened (whatever actual scenario it was) so why would I argue otherwise?

I'm not sure how you can possibly say the mother is being used by reporters! Presumably she contacted them as no one would've known about any of it otherwise.

Did you read the full article? About how there were other things that happened to their baby? About how he always seemed to go downhill when LL was on shift?

In another incident, the baby was found with an unusual amount of blood in his nappy when Letby was looking after him - which doctors could find no real cause. In a third incident, the infant suddenly collapsed inexplicably just as Letby was about to hand him over to night staff. Fortunately he recovered after a senior nurse took over and a doctor came to his aid.

And how she would get so angry when she didn't get to look after this baby. Totally normal professional behaviour there...

It always the whataboutery with you.

We’ve established, haven’t we, that removal of a NG tube and/or an oxygen mask/nasal cannula has nothing whatsoever to do with removal or dislodgement of an ET (breathing) tube?

The rest of it is unsubstantiated. Neither you nor I know whether either the blood or collapse were out of the ordinary. The difference is that you claim certainty despite your acknowledged ignorance.

Insanityisnotastrategy · 15/08/2025 20:27

Firefly1987 · 15/08/2025 20:07

Go explain it to the parents then-see how it goes down.

I'm not sure why you're so dogged that this very normal event was something sinister but I imagine the parents are similarly entrenched. What's relevant here is whether it's a reasonable and rational interpretation of what happened, and it quite obviously isn't. The idea that Letby sent photographic evidence of harming a baby is so bizarre, it really shows where you are with your thought processes tbh.
Again, the photo and the entire 'incident' was normal and entirely not harmful. No matter how many times you repeat yourself, that remains true.

Firefly1987 · 15/08/2025 20:39

Insanityisnotastrategy · 15/08/2025 20:27

I'm not sure why you're so dogged that this very normal event was something sinister but I imagine the parents are similarly entrenched. What's relevant here is whether it's a reasonable and rational interpretation of what happened, and it quite obviously isn't. The idea that Letby sent photographic evidence of harming a baby is so bizarre, it really shows where you are with your thought processes tbh.
Again, the photo and the entire 'incident' was normal and entirely not harmful. No matter how many times you repeat yourself, that remains true.

That's YOUR opinion only, if it was normal it wouldn't be newsworthy. And people feel emboldened to do things when they keep getting away with it. That's how they eventually get caught-duh. A bit like how your lot feel emboldened by the turning of public opinion (for now-until the police investigation is done) to dismiss everything she ever did. It won't age well though.

PinkTonic · 15/08/2025 21:07

Firefly1987 · 15/08/2025 20:39

That's YOUR opinion only, if it was normal it wouldn't be newsworthy. And people feel emboldened to do things when they keep getting away with it. That's how they eventually get caught-duh. A bit like how your lot feel emboldened by the turning of public opinion (for now-until the police investigation is done) to dismiss everything she ever did. It won't age well though.

You really do have a special way of thinking about things don’t you? She’d just been convicted. The press were salivating over any bit of dirt they could get their sticky mitts on. Those parents went to the paper with a salacious story and the paper lapped it up. That’s all.

Firefly1987 · 16/08/2025 19:56

PinkTonic · 15/08/2025 21:07

You really do have a special way of thinking about things don’t you? She’d just been convicted. The press were salivating over any bit of dirt they could get their sticky mitts on. Those parents went to the paper with a salacious story and the paper lapped it up. That’s all.

Their experience of their precious baby being in the clutches of a serial killer nurse is a "salacious story"? And I thought the patronising way so many posters talk about the parents involved in the case was bad enough. Not to mention the sheer arrogance of thinking they know what happened to these babies more than the parents! But you're something else. I don't know why you would be so nasty, I really don't. Even IF (and that's a big IF) they are mistaken and nothing untoward happened, why would you accuse them of being attention seeking or having a "salacious story"? The serial killer, literal SERIAL KILLER gets all the benefit of the doubt in the world, but a couple who want to speak out on possible harm by her (or at the least poor care by the sounds of it) are attention seekers? My god. I really hope you will be ashamed of this in years to come.

Everything LL did that might show a pattern/escalation of harm (and also getting close to the parents via fb etc.) is newsworthy and in the public interest.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page