Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Solicitor falsely accused me of blackmail and identity fraud – what can I do?

262 replies

PoisedPearlHelper · 30/07/2025 09:22

Hi everyone,
I’m feeling extremely distressed and could really use some advice.
A solicitor I approached just to witness a deed poll (literally a 10-minute job) has now written me a formal letter accusing me of identity fraud and blackmail, all because I left a Google review and asked for £150 compensation for the poor service I received.
To be clear:

  • I turned up to the appointment on time, waited over an hour past the scheduled slot without apology, and was treated incredibly rudely throughout.
  • The “identity fraud” claim appears to be based on my use of a perfectly valid house name (e.g., “The Croft”) in the deed poll, which is how my address appears on HMRC letters and utility bills.
  • I corrected a typo on the deed by hand with their permission before it was witnessed.
  • I later went to an independent solicitor who confirmed everything was fine and properly re-witnessed the deed poll.
Despite this, I received an aggressive letter warning me I would "hear from enforcement agencies," and treating my Google review + complaint as a criminal blackmail attempt. It’s left me shaken. I’ve now written a response asking them to:
  • Retract the accusations
  • Destroy my ID documents unless legally required
  • Justify their data handling under UK GDPR
  • Comply with the law around AML and GDPR disclosures
I’ve said if they don’t comply by 19 August, I’ll report them to the SRA, ICO and Legal Ombudsman. What else can I do to protect myself? Has anyone else experienced this kind of intimidation from a solicitor? Is it worth actually taking this to the police under harassment laws, or am I overreacting? I have a paper trail and am confident I’ve done nothing wrong, but I’m worried this could escalate or damage my name. Any legal or practical advice much appreciated – even just solidarity would help. This has genuinely shaken me. Thanks so much,
OP posts:
Hoppinggreen · 30/07/2025 14:43

Now OP's "friend" has started a thread about this as well

Ademasstudio · 30/07/2025 14:44

Laughlikeadrain · 30/07/2025 14:41

I think you have a very rose tinted view of solicitors. @Ademasstudio

they often write what appear to be very intimidating letters but actually have little substance- that is how they earn money in many cases.

they can’t be very busy if they’re hounding people who write bad google reviews.

The first thing Op - was your google review an honest review of your experience? If you had to pay another solicitor to do exactly the same work days later, that kind of proves it wasn’t to standard?

remember- they have to prove you did what they are accusing you of. It sounds like fair comment on your part.

just ignore them

Nah

I bet I’m right on this one

in fact, I’d bet a lot!

Laughlikeadrain · 30/07/2025 14:44

Ah - the plot thickens!

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Huggersunite · 30/07/2025 15:08

Can we get emotional damages for this thread?

Mrsttcno1 · 30/07/2025 15:13

Huggersunite · 30/07/2025 15:08

Can we get emotional damages for this thread?

I hope you can afford me! I value the time spent reading and responding at £500

Latenightreader · 30/07/2025 15:16

Hoppinggreen · 30/07/2025 14:43

Now OP's "friend" has started a thread about this as well

Two in fact, both now deleted, and giving a slightly slightly different account of events.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 30/07/2025 15:24

Bearing in mind how incredibly easy it is to link these multiple threads to the actual person and practice, I do hope for the OP's sake that nobody connected to the solicitors peruse MN. Because they are going to have an awful lot of ammunition to use.

JellyBeanSpring25 · 30/07/2025 15:33

PhilippaGeorgiou · 30/07/2025 15:24

Bearing in mind how incredibly easy it is to link these multiple threads to the actual person and practice, I do hope for the OP's sake that nobody connected to the solicitors peruse MN. Because they are going to have an awful lot of ammunition to use.

Both the firm of solicitors and OPs name can be easily found.

NimbleDreamer · 30/07/2025 16:07

forgotmyusername1 · 30/07/2025 13:17

I think the £150 is what the op values an hour of her time at rather than it being a refund of monies paid

Well in that case the OP is being even more unreasonable 😅

RainSoakedNights · 30/07/2025 16:17

JellyBeanSpring25 · 30/07/2025 15:33

Both the firm of solicitors and OPs name can be easily found.

Yes, it’s quite concerning.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 30/07/2025 16:31

JellyBeanSpring25 · 30/07/2025 15:33

Both the firm of solicitors and OPs name can be easily found.

I know. I found them in seconds. That is what I meant - the threads will not help her one little bit, espcially since the story seems to "migrate" at times.

Ademasstudio · 30/07/2025 18:27
  1. **Their spoken English was so limited that simple points had to be repeated, destroying confidence in any advice.

and they were a solicitor operating in the UK at a UK law firm

sure OP, sure

Ademasstudio · 30/07/2025 18:28

PhilippaGeorgiou · 30/07/2025 16:31

I know. I found them in seconds. That is what I meant - the threads will not help her one little bit, espcially since the story seems to "migrate" at times.

Wow really

what was the review like?

HotCrossBunplease · 30/07/2025 18:30

Ademasstudio · 30/07/2025 18:28

Wow really

what was the review like?

It’s posted in full in the OP of the other thread.

Ademasstudio · 30/07/2025 18:32

HotCrossBunplease · 30/07/2025 18:30

It’s posted in full in the OP of the other thread.

Been deleted now

mrssmurfspointyhat · 30/07/2025 18:51

Blank1234 · 30/07/2025 11:33

😂😂 That really doesn’t matter .. SRA was mentioned 12 times in the first 3 pages.. @mrssmurfspointyhat rocks up on page 4, after over a dozen mentions of it and suggests the very same thing 😵‍💫😵‍💫😂😂 Come on.

Oh for goodness sake, stop making a hanging offence out of this. Obviously I missed it so stop the pile-on.
Have you got nothing else to do except bully other posters?

SixteenClovesOfGarlic · 30/07/2025 18:58

Ademasstudio · 30/07/2025 18:32

Been deleted now

It's in Legal Matters section.

PsychoHotSauce · 30/07/2025 19:10

Ademasstudio · 30/07/2025 18:28

Wow really

what was the review like?

I just found them and read their other reviews. OP isn't the only one they've accused of both blackmail and fraud!

I also liked this other reply from them: "If you think [I was] rude then have at it."

HotCrossBunplease · 30/07/2025 19:15

PsychoHotSauce · 30/07/2025 19:10

I just found them and read their other reviews. OP isn't the only one they've accused of both blackmail and fraud!

I also liked this other reply from them: "If you think [I was] rude then have at it."

Sorry, the solicitor said that?

Like I said earlier, there is a code of professional conduct that prohibits that sort of comment. It’s part and parcel of being a solicitor, knowing how to deal with people like the OP, and threatening/goading people is absolutely not acceptable, no matter how unreasonable they are being

NigelPonsonbySmallpiece · 30/07/2025 19:19

PsychoHotSauce · 30/07/2025 19:10

I just found them and read their other reviews. OP isn't the only one they've accused of both blackmail and fraud!

I also liked this other reply from them: "If you think [I was] rude then have at it."

Can someone please PM me the solicitors firm, I’m keen to read the reviews 😁

PsychoHotSauce · 30/07/2025 19:24

HotCrossBunplease · 30/07/2025 19:15

Sorry, the solicitor said that?

Like I said earlier, there is a code of professional conduct that prohibits that sort of comment. It’s part and parcel of being a solicitor, knowing how to deal with people like the OP, and threatening/goading people is absolutely not acceptable, no matter how unreasonable they are being

Yep. It's pretty impressive how brazen it is: "Your review comes quite as a surprise considering you attempted to commit fraud.... You continued to blackmail us at which point for our own protection and safeguarding, we notified you that we are now recording the conversation and will be notifying the police of your attempted fraud and deception.... Thank you for posting your review, we now have the details required to take this matter further with the Police and the Courts. Your review has allowed us to write a response which we hope will prevent any further incidents of fraudulent persons entering our offices."

That's all from one review response, and not aimed at the OP Grin

Typicalwave · 30/07/2025 19:33

PsychoHotSauce · 30/07/2025 19:24

Yep. It's pretty impressive how brazen it is: "Your review comes quite as a surprise considering you attempted to commit fraud.... You continued to blackmail us at which point for our own protection and safeguarding, we notified you that we are now recording the conversation and will be notifying the police of your attempted fraud and deception.... Thank you for posting your review, we now have the details required to take this matter further with the Police and the Courts. Your review has allowed us to write a response which we hope will prevent any further incidents of fraudulent persons entering our offices."

That's all from one review response, and not aimed at the OP Grin

Edited

Wow.

HotCrossBunplease · 30/07/2025 19:51

NigelPonsonbySmallpiece · 30/07/2025 19:19

Can someone please PM me the solicitors firm, I’m keen to read the reviews 😁

And me, I don’t know how others were doing it but I couldn't find it using the text of the review.

RainSoakedNights · 30/07/2025 19:52

NigelPonsonbySmallpiece · 30/07/2025 19:19

Can someone please PM me the solicitors firm, I’m keen to read the reviews 😁

And me!

HotCrossBunplease · 30/07/2025 20:19

If that comment by the firm is real, it shows that they are absolutely terrible lawyers. A person can't be “fraudulent”. A document can be fraudulent, a person can assume a fraudulent identity, a person can act fraudulently or be intent on committing fraud, but a “fraudulent person” is grammatical nonsense. And any lawyer worth their salt would know that it is not worth risking a libel claim by accusing a person of fraud and blackmail on the internet. There are multiple confidential ways to pursue their allegations if they genuinely believe a fraud to have been committed. I also wonder if it’s potentially tipping off should the alleged fraud relate to money laundering.

It seems that OP and these solicitors are as crazy as each other. What an unfortunate combination.