Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Thread 19 Starmer - A Coalition of the Willing

1000 replies

DuncinToffee · 03/03/2025 08:25

.https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5276594-thread-18-starmer-all-sides-of-the-house-agree-apart-from-the-trump-bootlickers?page=40&reply=142583752

previous thread

OP posts:
Thread gallery
82
Grumpyoldpersonwithcats · 10/03/2025 19:08

Dow Jones is now 1000 points down today. Still a couple of hours of trading so things may change, but certainly looking as if Trump's genius bigly economic decisions are just super...

BIossomtoes · 10/03/2025 19:21

Tesla shares down over 15% and X cyber attacked. Poor Elon.

Grumpyoldpersonwithcats · 10/03/2025 19:24

BIossomtoes · 10/03/2025 19:21

Tesla shares down over 15% and X cyber attacked. Poor Elon.

My heart bleeds.

Alexandra2001 · 10/03/2025 20:04

Grumpyoldpersonwithcats · 10/03/2025 19:08

Dow Jones is now 1000 points down today. Still a couple of hours of trading so things may change, but certainly looking as if Trump's genius bigly economic decisions are just super...

Apparently the view now is that Trump may cause the US to go into recession... and increase inflation at the same time... hence the recent falls...

& that wont be good for any of us, not least with our higher than any comparable country, borrowing costs.

LlynTegid · 10/03/2025 20:14

BIossomtoes · 10/03/2025 19:21

Tesla shares down over 15% and X cyber attacked. Poor Elon.

I am glad I left what was then called Twitter four years ago, lack of use.

biscuitandcake · 10/03/2025 20:21

pointythings · 10/03/2025 10:34

@Rummly insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Your knee jerk demand for cuts comes under this definition.

The Tories spent 14 years slashing benefits and vilifying claimants. It achieved fuck all. Time for a different approach.

It didn't achieve fuck all to be fair! The amount spent in welfare (after 14 years of austerity/cuts) actually went up a lot! Part of that is stuff like Covid. But part of it is the same way that if you "save money" by not repairing a broken roof tile it mysteriously ends up costing more money years later to fix all the water damage in the attic. Obviously the conclusion some would draw is that there has been ridiculous overspending on household maintenance so time to stop cleaning those gutters etc.

I do agree that a large proportion of the population not working isn't sustainable. But you don't deal with it by just cutting without properly investigating why different groups aren't working. If cuts absolutely do need to be made they should be done with a scalpel not an axe. But cuts alone won't fix the problem.

Rummly · 10/03/2025 20:52

pointythings · 10/03/2025 10:34

@Rummly insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Your knee jerk demand for cuts comes under this definition.

The Tories spent 14 years slashing benefits and vilifying claimants. It achieved fuck all. Time for a different approach.

Maybe. Maybe not.

But it looks like Labour has come to the conclusion that welfare is out of control and needs cutting back. As I said, I recognise the problem faced by this government. I’m pleased they’re at least talking about it. And rather like the NHS, it’s easier for Labour than the Tories to make changes and see off the outcry.

Anyway, I strongly doubt that any meaningful dent in public expenditure will result. So those who strongly oppose reductions in welfare can rest easy. We’ll find out at least some of the details tomorrow, apparently.

BIossomtoes · 10/03/2025 22:07

Thank you. I really enjoyed that. Crace never disappoints.

RafaistheKingofClay · 10/03/2025 22:09

Rummly · 10/03/2025 20:52

Maybe. Maybe not.

But it looks like Labour has come to the conclusion that welfare is out of control and needs cutting back. As I said, I recognise the problem faced by this government. I’m pleased they’re at least talking about it. And rather like the NHS, it’s easier for Labour than the Tories to make changes and see off the outcry.

Anyway, I strongly doubt that any meaningful dent in public expenditure will result. So those who strongly oppose reductions in welfare can rest easy. We’ll find out at least some of the details tomorrow, apparently.

No meaningful dent in public expenditure will result. The bill will keep going up in exactly the same way it has gone up every time we have cut it. With a much more important fact that it will kill people.

TooBigForMyBoots · 10/03/2025 22:10

Welfare does not need cutting back. It doesn't work so we should stop spending money and resources on it.

Support works. Labour should focus on that. Community prescribing. Gym passes. Organisations that provide support, nurturing, skills and training opportunities. The stuff that used to happen in community centres /FE colleges in the past.

This one small shift in focus would result in the immediate benefit of alleviating stress and distress in people who are disabled or unwell, and their carers. It will prevent panicked calls to GPs, Consultants and other HCPs. And it will put money where it works.

We can't scare people into the workplace but we can scare them into a worse place.

RafaistheKingofClay · 10/03/2025 22:10

biscuitandcake · 10/03/2025 20:21

It didn't achieve fuck all to be fair! The amount spent in welfare (after 14 years of austerity/cuts) actually went up a lot! Part of that is stuff like Covid. But part of it is the same way that if you "save money" by not repairing a broken roof tile it mysteriously ends up costing more money years later to fix all the water damage in the attic. Obviously the conclusion some would draw is that there has been ridiculous overspending on household maintenance so time to stop cleaning those gutters etc.

I do agree that a large proportion of the population not working isn't sustainable. But you don't deal with it by just cutting without properly investigating why different groups aren't working. If cuts absolutely do need to be made they should be done with a scalpel not an axe. But cuts alone won't fix the problem.

See also pot holes.

TooBigForMyBoots · 10/03/2025 22:38

I read the Alexander Armstrong stuff upthread. Thanks for the laughs.Thanks Twat in a Cravat nails it.GrinHmm

I read the article. What he pays in school fees for one of his children is the same as my annual household income for an adult and 2 children, 1 with SEN.

He proves that money and connections can't buy intelligence, awareness or class. He's lucky he was born rich and posh. They're the only attributes he has.

RafaistheKingofClay · 10/03/2025 22:54

I missed twat in a cravate. Genius.

I see he jumped on the ‘write a children’s book’ bandwagon last year too.

ilovesooty · 10/03/2025 23:09

TooBigForMyBoots · 10/03/2025 22:10

Welfare does not need cutting back. It doesn't work so we should stop spending money and resources on it.

Support works. Labour should focus on that. Community prescribing. Gym passes. Organisations that provide support, nurturing, skills and training opportunities. The stuff that used to happen in community centres /FE colleges in the past.

This one small shift in focus would result in the immediate benefit of alleviating stress and distress in people who are disabled or unwell, and their carers. It will prevent panicked calls to GPs, Consultants and other HCPs. And it will put money where it works.

We can't scare people into the workplace but we can scare them into a worse place.

Edited

We have exercise programme prescribing where I live. Last week I suggested to a client in another part of the country that she could ask her GP what's available.

Nothing. Zilch. 😡

Alexandra2001 · 11/03/2025 07:20

Rummly · 10/03/2025 20:52

Maybe. Maybe not.

But it looks like Labour has come to the conclusion that welfare is out of control and needs cutting back. As I said, I recognise the problem faced by this government. I’m pleased they’re at least talking about it. And rather like the NHS, it’s easier for Labour than the Tories to make changes and see off the outcry.

Anyway, I strongly doubt that any meaningful dent in public expenditure will result. So those who strongly oppose reductions in welfare can rest easy. We’ll find out at least some of the details tomorrow, apparently.

Surely easier for the Tories, i'd have thought, its expected from them isn't it & they've a media supportive of them.

Its shameful that the previous Govt allowed Welfare to get out of control like this, much like their failure to boost Defence spend after 2022.

But the point here is that making claims harder and reducing payments, achieves nothing, just pushes people into worse outcomes/different benefits, costing more, as the last 14 years has shown.

People who haven't worked for a v long time, need help and assistance into work, people with health issues need these addressing first, how many of the millions on waiting lists could work if they were treated?

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 11/03/2025 07:40

Starmer is sounding more and more like a Tory. I'm sure the welfare budget needs attention, but to what genuine extent? We won't know, because this is about taking off the poor in order to fund wars elsewhere, I think. Appalling really, and probably arrogant, given our relative strength compared to the Trump/Putlin bloc, nasty as they are.

Zonder · 11/03/2025 07:44

"Surely easier for the Tories, i'd have thought, its expected from them isn't it & they've a media supportive of them."

This is key isn't it @Alexandra2001 ? For a long time whatever the Tories did they would have support from a good chunk of the media. It shows how much they blew it that the media turned against them at the end.

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 11/03/2025 08:46

The government (Reeves) has already said that they need to find several million in spending cuts. Thats accepted. So why take the money off those least able to fight back, and in a cost of living crisis. Put the fucking tax up, and get a backbone!

Rummly · 11/03/2025 09:18

Zonder · 11/03/2025 07:44

"Surely easier for the Tories, i'd have thought, its expected from them isn't it & they've a media supportive of them."

This is key isn't it @Alexandra2001 ? For a long time whatever the Tories did they would have support from a good chunk of the media. It shows how much they blew it that the media turned against them at the end.

No, I don’t think that’s right. What happens is that the Tories say “we will reform and reduce welfare payments because the balance of support v work isn’t right” or “we will re-structure the NHS” and the left shouts endlessly about cruelty, fat cats and privatisation.

Stories appear all over the internet, the Guardian and the Mirror about people dying, left homeless and so on.

If Labour says the same things there will be much, much less of this clamour.

Basically, the ‘wicked Tories’ trope takes hold in a way that it doesn’t with Labour because the right would tend to support reduction in public spending.

SerendipityJane · 11/03/2025 09:41

RafaistheKingofClay · 10/03/2025 22:09

No meaningful dent in public expenditure will result. The bill will keep going up in exactly the same way it has gone up every time we have cut it. With a much more important fact that it will kill people.

Yes. But nobody that matters.

RafaistheKingofClay · 11/03/2025 09:57

SerendipityJane · 11/03/2025 09:41

Yes. But nobody that matters.

True. Although the Tories have already killed loads of people so at some point we might end up starting to kill people that matter.

Alexandra2001 · 11/03/2025 12:15

Rummly · 11/03/2025 09:18

No, I don’t think that’s right. What happens is that the Tories say “we will reform and reduce welfare payments because the balance of support v work isn’t right” or “we will re-structure the NHS” and the left shouts endlessly about cruelty, fat cats and privatisation.

Stories appear all over the internet, the Guardian and the Mirror about people dying, left homeless and so on.

If Labour says the same things there will be much, much less of this clamour.

Basically, the ‘wicked Tories’ trope takes hold in a way that it doesn’t with Labour because the right would tend to support reduction in public spending.

Nope, those papers will still publish these stories, only now the Express 'Mail etc will run them too, as they have done already over WPA.

The issues with the NHS are no small part due to Tory privatisations.

You tell me how community OT, Physio and MH is better delivered by a private company like Livewell in the S/W, using NHS trained staff, on exactly the same T&C's, duplicate back office functions, more management, more directors... shareholders... than if the NHS had just continued to run these services as they used too?

SerendipityJane · 11/03/2025 12:17

I see suggestions that Musk could fund a new party and dump Reform.

Seems to have put the willies up GBNews.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.