Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Anyone watching the Budget 2024?

1000 replies

LadyofRutshire · 30/10/2024 12:13

I couldn't find a thread on today's budget. Anyone watching live?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Parsley1234 · 30/10/2024 19:56

@AquaPeer it seems pretty negative there’s no positive vibe coming out it’s very anti business and growth unless your public sector it’s managed decline. Fuck whether she’s a woman she’s a total imbecile who has just put stress onto a precarious situation at least under the tories inflation was coming down growth was starting now it’s being reversed for what ? Bloated public sector and stagnant economy

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:59

Parsley1234 · 30/10/2024 19:56

@AquaPeer it seems pretty negative there’s no positive vibe coming out it’s very anti business and growth unless your public sector it’s managed decline. Fuck whether she’s a woman she’s a total imbecile who has just put stress onto a precarious situation at least under the tories inflation was coming down growth was starting now it’s being reversed for what ? Bloated public sector and stagnant economy

That’s not really very… specific?! I mean if those things were true they were true the last time employers NI was increased?

NoCarbsForMe · 30/10/2024 20:00

Parsley1234 · 30/10/2024 19:56

@AquaPeer it seems pretty negative there’s no positive vibe coming out it’s very anti business and growth unless your public sector it’s managed decline. Fuck whether she’s a woman she’s a total imbecile who has just put stress onto a precarious situation at least under the tories inflation was coming down growth was starting now it’s being reversed for what ? Bloated public sector and stagnant economy

Have you not noticed the public sector crisis? FFS

LivelyBlake · 30/10/2024 20:00

Miley1967 · 30/10/2024 19:56

Was there anything about benefits other than the increase in earnings threshold for carers allowance and a clampdown on fraud? can't seem to find anything else?

The chancellor confirmed the amount received in benefits will rise by 1.7% in April, in line with inflation.

Normalrulesdontapply · 30/10/2024 20:02

Parsley1234 · 30/10/2024 19:56

@AquaPeer it seems pretty negative there’s no positive vibe coming out it’s very anti business and growth unless your public sector it’s managed decline. Fuck whether she’s a woman she’s a total imbecile who has just put stress onto a precarious situation at least under the tories inflation was coming down growth was starting now it’s being reversed for what ? Bloated public sector and stagnant economy

What?!!! She has just announced huge investment into infrastructure projects and public services that is all desperately needed. I think it is a very positive budget and would much rather have this than the tories destroying our society and services.

LadyofRutshire · 30/10/2024 20:03

New thread link. Just having dinner. Will catch up and join in again.

www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5199162-budget-2024-2?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

OP posts:
Mumdadbingo · 30/10/2024 20:03

Tryingtokeepgoing · 30/10/2024 19:30

£800k profit, that will be taxed, on what might be a £10m or £15m balance sheet isn’t a great return on capital, taking into account risk.

Sure, it’s not the breadline, but we need people setting up, growing and running companies like this because they employ half the working people in this country. That 200 people will be generating a million in employers NI and probably another £2 or £3 million in PAYE receipts to the government. And, if it’s VAT registered, more money there as well. Perhaps £500k or more in business rates.

The left might well moan about £800k being a lot of money, but as a % of capital employed after tax it’s not. And it generates multiples of that for HMRC. Maybe they’d be better selling the land and buildings for housing, and investing their £15 million in listed (probably US) businesses. But that knocks £4 million out of governments hand, and potentially makes 200 people redundant. But it’s okay, because someone perceived as rich isn’t now making profits through their business

This government came in on a growth agenda, yet growth has been revised down, inflation up and cost of money up. That doesn’t look like growth.

It’s a fair point around a comparatively low return on investments leading to different investment strategies.

But it does basically highlight that rather than going “poor business owners” we are talking about people going “I am not making as much return running a business as I could elsewhere, and that makes me want to change where I invest my money.”

This is both a) true and as you point out, could have a negative impact on the country. But b) we should all cut the BS about ‘poor business owners’ when we are essentially saying these are millionaires who feel they could make more money doing something else. That’s also
fine. But IMO they don’t deserve any sympathy for having additional problems and decisions to make.

And anyone with £15m assets is not ‘perceived’ as rich - they are genuinely rich.

(I mean I know this is all a fictional example)

ThatsCute · 30/10/2024 20:04

frozendaisy · 30/10/2024 18:05

All the rich lot threatening to leave.

Just go. It will be fine without you.

I think this budget is a step in the right direction.
Depends on how it's spent of course, but one step at a time.
Rachel Reeves sounded informed, calm with an overall vision.

First female Chancellor. Yeah seems ok

Who’s been threatening to leave?

LivelyBlake · 30/10/2024 20:05

Growth projections are dire, as we have been told this morning: next year the economy is expected to expand by 2%. The growth rate will slow in subsequent years to 1.8% and 1.5% in 2027. Inflation rate above 2% throughout.

Parsley1234 · 30/10/2024 20:09

lets wait and see I would put money on the fact there will be no sorting out of anything everything will decline more and we will all be poorer. Re the rich leaving I already know of 5 who have gone you may say good but they are the people who spend and employ when they are gone it’s gets a bit worse

ThatsCute · 30/10/2024 20:09

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 18:12

Yes a few southern European countries are open to the British elderly with cash on the hip. Good thing you’re fluent in Portuguese and will obviously love the culture and adapt easily too!
Don’t you love it when the elderly are so very upwardly mobile. I think we’d quite like more of them to be like that. As long as we stop their state pension and nhs entitlement, obviously.

Edited

They still get their state pension abroad.

Livelovebehappy · 30/10/2024 20:12

ThatsCute · 30/10/2024 20:09

They still get their state pension abroad.

And many on benefits can still get them when living abroad. Which is bonkers. At least pensioners paid into the system so are entitled to it.

Windchimesandsong · 30/10/2024 20:13

PinkFruitbat · 30/10/2024 17:34

You need to look at sector by sector; education, health, law and order and learn from the best.

Singapore, Switzerland, Australia, South Korea.

For example; why do we have so many weeks off on school holiday? Is that preparing our children for the global economy?

Singapore you say.

They've certainly got housing right. Something like 90% public aka social housing. So everyone, including those on lower incomes, have decent affordable homes.

Which of course achieves what you said you wanted in another post you made - lower benefit bill. Because
a) expensive private housing makes up a significant proportion of the benefits bill, and
b) bad or insecure housing harms health - which causes more people to be unable to work, and also costs the NHS loads.

As for long school summer holidays. I'm aware not everyone will agree with me but I think it's good for children to have that break. I still have fond memories of my own childhood summer holidays from school, and I value that time with my own DC now.

Windchimesandsong · 30/10/2024 20:17

Livelovebehappy · 30/10/2024 20:12

And many on benefits can still get them when living abroad. Which is bonkers. At least pensioners paid into the system so are entitled to it.

Who gets benefits abroad?

The USA allows people on long-term disability to receive them if they move abroad but the UK doesn't. Nor can job seekers.

I think the US is right to allow disabled people to receive benefits abroad. They're not costing anymore by living abroad - if fact, often costing less because won't be using the NHS or other services in the UK.

Btw everyone pays in. Income tax isn't the only tax. And also loads of disabled and ill people worked and "paid in", sometimes for decades, before becoming unable to work. And do you really think disabled children don't deserve support? Don't you want a civilised society?

Tryingtokeepgoing · 30/10/2024 20:22

Mumdadbingo · 30/10/2024 20:03

It’s a fair point around a comparatively low return on investments leading to different investment strategies.

But it does basically highlight that rather than going “poor business owners” we are talking about people going “I am not making as much return running a business as I could elsewhere, and that makes me want to change where I invest my money.”

This is both a) true and as you point out, could have a negative impact on the country. But b) we should all cut the BS about ‘poor business owners’ when we are essentially saying these are millionaires who feel they could make more money doing something else. That’s also
fine. But IMO they don’t deserve any sympathy for having additional problems and decisions to make.

And anyone with £15m assets is not ‘perceived’ as rich - they are genuinely rich.

(I mean I know this is all a fictional example)

Oh absolutely fictional, but representative in a smaller or larger scale of many many SMEs and therefore private businesses and people that the left see (because at one level they are) rich. But to give it some context, their £15m of assets generate £5m a year for the government in tax receipts, but less than a million for the people with capital at risk. And still people want to tax the rich more. They should teach more of this stuff at school…

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 20:27

Namechange83649 · 30/10/2024 18:51

What about 'businesses' such as GP surgeries and universities with no profits nor surplus?

As a PP has said, no, their GP practice won't be become bankrupt, but they will not replace a GP when they leave. And that's good for society, how?

And universities, where do we start. The vast majority, with the exception of Oxford, Cambridge and possibly a few others who have high philanthropic and/or historical Trust incomes, are already in a catastrophic, financial mess. They are already making huge numbers of redundancies, cutting courses and reducing modules.

There's no precedent for HEI bankruptcy, but without some form of govt intervention, I don't see how many can survive. This doesn't just affect students and staff, but has massive ramifications for research, the local economy and knowledge exchange.

Edited

All of these businesses can have surplus’ if they spend less than their income. They just can’t have profit

universities are my specialist subject at the moment. Believe me, they’re not going bankrupt due the 1.2% in employers NI.

they’re going bankrupt for 50% reductions in income, inflation, massive % increases in public sector pensions, and borrowing costs.

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 20:28

ThatsCute · 30/10/2024 20:09

They still get their state pension abroad.

I know that’s why I would stop it

Windchimesandsong · 30/10/2024 20:30

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 20:28

I know that’s why I would stop it

Why? They've paid in and are entitled to their pension. And are actually saving the UK money because, as they live abroad, they're not using the NHS or other public services.

Papyrophile · 30/10/2024 20:30

@AquaPeer And be the only major economy to withdraw the reward that follows a life's work? Even the Americans don't do that!

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 20:31

Windchimesandsong · 30/10/2024 20:30

Why? They've paid in and are entitled to their pension. And are actually saving the UK money because, as they live abroad, they're not using the NHS or other public services.

Because they want to live somewhere else to escape tax so byeeeeeee

Papyrophile · 30/10/2024 20:32

It might be about the weather being nicer for retirement? Portobello or Porto? I'd pick Porto every time.

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 20:34

Papyrophile · 30/10/2024 20:32

It might be about the weather being nicer for retirement? Portobello or Porto? I'd pick Porto every time.

Not the poster I was responding too, it was because she wants to avoid paying tax

Mumdadbingo · 30/10/2024 20:34

Tryingtokeepgoing · 30/10/2024 20:22

Oh absolutely fictional, but representative in a smaller or larger scale of many many SMEs and therefore private businesses and people that the left see (because at one level they are) rich. But to give it some context, their £15m of assets generate £5m a year for the government in tax receipts, but less than a million for the people with capital at risk. And still people want to tax the rich more. They should teach more of this stuff at school…

But they are not losing any of the 15m in this example by paying any tax. Whereas someone who is paid 50k is potentially paying more tax out of what they personally earn than if the company profits are not withdrawn from the org.

And also, the activity of the people working for them is what is generating the income as well. You might as well say that the fictional employee who has sold 500 hot dogs in a day for £10 a piece incl. 20% VAT has generated £1k tax for the government.

Basically- if you have £15m you have to do something with it. It is good for society that you do not store it under your bed, and actually invest it in something that helps the economy.

And this should be encouraged. And you can argue the government is not doing enough to encourage it.

But let’s not pretend that it truly costs people with £15m to invest anything to actually do something with their money- if the only downside is opportunity cost, they don’t get to claim any moral value to their actions - it’s purely self interest (which is fine, but stop claiming anything else)

the80sweregreat · 30/10/2024 20:35

Don't know about ' not using the NHS' I've known a few who live abroad , yet come back to the UK for treatment on the NHS when it suits them !
Maybe harder these days, but definitely went on in the past. Especially when they discover many countries don't have the care that the UK have ( even if it is hit and miss / shit these days)

Livelovebehappy · 30/10/2024 20:35

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 20:31

Because they want to live somewhere else to escape tax so byeeeeeee

Lots of pensioners move abroad for the sun and better standard of living, and not to escape tax. 🙄

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread