Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Anyone watching the Budget 2024?

1000 replies

LadyofRutshire · 30/10/2024 12:13

I couldn't find a thread on today's budget. Anyone watching live?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:07

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 19:02

@EasternStandard can you link to the OBR discussing that point as I’d like to read more on it? Idid try googling.

It’s not a point it’s just in their list of potential implications of this budget- all of which are fairly obvious. They are simply providing their independent analysis, as per their remit. No one is saying it’s good or bad thing, I don’t know where this simplistic conversation is actually going to get us!

Killingoffmyflowersonebyone · 30/10/2024 19:08

Boohoo76 · 30/10/2024 18:55

The OBR have actually said that the employer NI increase will impact employees (or working people as the Government like to call them).

It 100% will.

Because employers will either need to not increase wages, or cut staff, or increase the cost of their services they provide in order to make up for the loss. Someone on the thread earlier said it would cost her business an extra £24K a year she doesn't have...

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 19:09

@AquaPeer ah ok, I thought it would be broken down.

EasternStandard · 30/10/2024 19:09

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:04

Yes any examples of all these businesses that will fold? It’s going to happen, for sure, according to you so must be easy?!

Re your question- not sure what you want but I’m assuming you know that “employees national insurance contributions will be passed onto employees” means that there is the potential that companies will hold back future pay increases to compensate?

Well no it's not that easy as it's still the same day, I'm sure it will take a bit longer than that.

there is the potential that companies will hold back future pay increases to compensate

And that is good why?

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:09

Boohoo76 · 30/10/2024 19:00

So you are stating that it will have no impact whatsoever?

Of course not- you’re trying a bit of a trumpian boxing in there aren’t you 😉 we can have a discussion that isn’t black and white.

WhitegreeNcandle · 30/10/2024 19:10

Tryingtokeepgoing · 30/10/2024 18:56

We farm well over 15 million hectares in the UK, so if less than 2% is used for maize I’m sure we will survive. Even if we just look at arable land there are over 4 million hectares farmed. So if 6 % is used for maize, much of which actually ends up in cooking oils for crisps anyway, I don’t think it is quite the issue, or that farmers are quite the enemy, you think.

Furthermore when you farm the best farmers don’t farm for tomorrow, or next month or next year. My Dad did things 40 years ago that are benefitting the soil today. He’s doing things now that won’t pay financial dividends for decades.

farming for the short term is a recipe for disaster

EasternStandard · 30/10/2024 19:10

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:07

It’s not a point it’s just in their list of potential implications of this budget- all of which are fairly obvious. They are simply providing their independent analysis, as per their remit. No one is saying it’s good or bad thing, I don’t know where this simplistic conversation is actually going to get us!

The OBR just do analysis but you sound quite supportive of Labour's tax rises for businesses. Are you not?

Thislittlepiggylikeschocolate · 30/10/2024 19:12

Re taking paying IHT on pensions

I actually agree with the policy, but does anyone else think this may backfire? I am 59 and am lucky to have a decent pension pot. Because of the budget, I think I may as well just stop work and spend it until it runs out!
If I am thinking this, I would imagine many higher tax earners (I'm not now) may be thinking the same, as they have more than likely factored this in their IHT planning - to leave to children tax free.
I know the government is keen that people continue to be economically active until up to state pension age.

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:12

EasternStandard · 30/10/2024 19:09

Well no it's not that easy as it's still the same day, I'm sure it will take a bit longer than that.

there is the potential that companies will hold back future pay increases to compensate

And that is good why?

  1. who said it was good?
  2. it has a more minimal impact, since that’s not money lost to the employees pocket. Ideally, longer term that would be “caught up”, of course.
  3. again, it is simply a potential impact. Nothing comes without impact.
Mlanket · 30/10/2024 19:12

there is the potential that companies will hold back future pay increases to compensate

Some will but it turn some staff will leave for competitors if pay is frozen or move into other industries. Some companies will operate with less staff and some will pass the cost on.

Mumdadbingo · 30/10/2024 19:12

Tryingtokeepgoing · 30/10/2024 18:28

A business doesn’t have to be in financial difficulty to find swallowing upwards of £1k per employee difficult, if you are in a labour intensive industry or sector. There are plenty of privately owned business employing between 50 and 250:people that are the backbone of our economy but that don’t make tens of millions in profit. If they’re lucky they making a million or so. So £200k is a big hit. It’s doable of course, and will accelerate automation in retail and hospitality. And it’ll lead to lower payrises for employees. And / or price rises for customers. All of which are acceptable, but it defies logic to claim that that isn’t what will happen.

I mean - in the fictional example you’ve created the privately owned business is still making 800k profit for presumably single digit shareholders if they absorb 100% of the cost.

It’s fair to say a lot of the impacts will be passed onto employees and customers, but let’s not pretend that private business owners aren’t in the business to make money for themselves and can make decisions about how to absorb or spread costs.

Publically traded companies are in a more rough spot.

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 19:13
  1. again, it is simply a potential impact. Nothing comes without impact.

Particularly not a budget!

Charlize43 · 30/10/2024 19:14

BIossomtoes · 30/10/2024 19:06

Pensioners who can no longer drive travel on buses for nothing. We have non means tested bus passes for everyone over state pension age in most of the country and everyone over 60 in London.

Yes, of course we do... Budget day always makes me feel sick and irrational.

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:16

Thislittlepiggylikeschocolate · 30/10/2024 19:12

Re taking paying IHT on pensions

I actually agree with the policy, but does anyone else think this may backfire? I am 59 and am lucky to have a decent pension pot. Because of the budget, I think I may as well just stop work and spend it until it runs out!
If I am thinking this, I would imagine many higher tax earners (I'm not now) may be thinking the same, as they have more than likely factored this in their IHT planning - to leave to children tax free.
I know the government is keen that people continue to be economically active until up to state pension age.

i Don’t really know whether many people would make decisions that impact the last 30/40 years of their life based on the possibility their heirs could save tax? Maybe my family are weird but they take all sorts of things from employment and wouldn’t consider this.

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 19:16

@Thislittlepiggylikeschocolate some will want to spend but many will still want to hold onto the security of it I think. Plenty won’t want to run out.

WhitegreeNcandle · 30/10/2024 19:17

I’ve also just twigged with the whole APR IHT they haven’t mentioned rollover. I will be fuming if they continue to allow rollover and hit family farms with IHT.

Boohoo76 · 30/10/2024 19:18

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:09

Of course not- you’re trying a bit of a trumpian boxing in there aren’t you 😉 we can have a discussion that isn’t black and white.

Well I am saying that it will have an impact and have been clear on that in my posts. You were the one challenging my view. Either it will have an impact or it won’t. Make up your mind.

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:18

EasternStandard · 30/10/2024 19:10

The OBR just do analysis but you sound quite supportive of Labour's tax rises for businesses. Are you not?

i don’t really understand why that’s an accusation?! It’s not really relevant to the conversation. I wouldn’t make things up in order to demonstrate how anti the budget I am, which many people on this thread are doing.

EasternStandard · 30/10/2024 19:18

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:12

  1. who said it was good?
  2. it has a more minimal impact, since that’s not money lost to the employees pocket. Ideally, longer term that would be “caught up”, of course.
  3. again, it is simply a potential impact. Nothing comes without impact.

Well yes that's the point there is an impact.

It affects 'working people' after all and we'll see what happens to growth

V0xPopuli · 30/10/2024 19:18

Because employers will either need to not increase wages, or cut staff, or increase the cost of their services they provide in order to make up for the loss. Someone on the thread earlier said it would cost her business an extra £24K a year she doesn't have...

Its not a given.

You can't not increase wages if your competitors take the hit to profit to compete for staff.

You can't cut staff if doing so will lose you business (or lose you staff if you try to overwork them)

If you have unproductive staff who can be cut without business impact, that's not a bad thing and actually given we have a labour shortage it frees up people to take other roles.

You can't increase your prices if your customers won't pay more.

People claim its not the case but sometimes costs like these simply reduce:

  • corporate profits
  • executive/senior pay
AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:19

Boohoo76 · 30/10/2024 19:18

Well I am saying that it will have an impact and have been clear on that in my posts. You were the one challenging my view. Either it will have an impact or it won’t. Make up your mind.

Everything has an impact. Impacts are not, or course all equal. It is raising a shit ton of tax revenue, which is one impact. We might see 5,000,000 million people made redundant, which is another impact. I don’t really get your point.

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 19:20

It affects 'working people' after all and we'll see what happens to growth

Would it have more or less of an impact if it was put directly onto employees NI?

LivelyBlake · 30/10/2024 19:21

people don’t deserve a business just because they want one

WTF

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:22

V0xPopuli · 30/10/2024 19:18

Because employers will either need to not increase wages, or cut staff, or increase the cost of their services they provide in order to make up for the loss. Someone on the thread earlier said it would cost her business an extra £24K a year she doesn't have...

Its not a given.

You can't not increase wages if your competitors take the hit to profit to compete for staff.

You can't cut staff if doing so will lose you business (or lose you staff if you try to overwork them)

If you have unproductive staff who can be cut without business impact, that's not a bad thing and actually given we have a labour shortage it frees up people to take other roles.

You can't increase your prices if your customers won't pay more.

People claim its not the case but sometimes costs like these simply reduce:

  • corporate profits
  • executive/senior pay

Yes- for example, in every company I’ve worked in for 4 years now, the executive have forgone pay increases and bonus’ and but they’ve prioritised lower paid workers pay increases.

this year we’ve given a pay increase to everyone under £26k, but no one else has had one. People may chose to leave because of this of course, but that impact was taken into accounts as part of the decision.

last year i worked for a company who gave everyone another 2 days annual leave instead.

Boohoo76 · 30/10/2024 19:23

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 19:19

Everything has an impact. Impacts are not, or course all equal. It is raising a shit ton of tax revenue, which is one impact. We might see 5,000,000 million people made redundant, which is another impact. I don’t really get your point.

Ah so you are saying that it will only have a positive impact…well the OBR disagrees with you.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.