Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Anyone watching the Budget 2024?

1000 replies

LadyofRutshire · 30/10/2024 12:13

I couldn't find a thread on today's budget. Anyone watching live?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Windchimesandsong · 30/10/2024 17:35

PinkFruitbat · 30/10/2024 17:22

Of course it is about individuals.

Someone on £150k pays over 21 times as much income tax as someone on £25k.

How much more would you like them to pay?

From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs.

Btw I'm not on a salary as high as £150K, but I will say that I'm happy to pay what I can afford. I want to live in a civilised society - where everyone, including those less financially privileged, have access to life's necessities. I want a society with good public services, a supportive benefits safety net, more council housing, and job and training opportunities.

And of course that ends up paying for itself. Because timely access to essential public services, affordable and decent housing, good healthcare, etc, means fewer people will need support.
False economy is never the answer.

Also, taxes (which everyone pays - working or not) aren't the only contribution to society. Aside from there being more than financial contribution, there's indirect financial contributions - that boost the economy. Spending in shops, having tradespeople do work on your home etc.

Oh, and the people on £25K are helping keep the businesses that employ them afloat. The CEOs on £150K (or more) need the lower paid workers to keep their businesses going and their larger income coming in.

frozendaisy · 30/10/2024 17:36

PinkFruitbat · 30/10/2024 17:22

Of course it is about individuals.

Someone on £150k pays over 21 times as much income tax as someone on £25k.

How much more would you like them to pay?

We have lost the £12k tax free amount at the bottom of the scale, even with ploughing as much as possible into pensions etc.

It's not about how much you pay, it's how much do you need?

I guess it's different outlooks, when more people are thriving, happy, buoyant, then for us life is happier, more enjoyable, buoyant. Being in a gilded castle with other prince and princesses all slapping each other on the back for them all being just super whilst the plebs freeze is weird to us.

The happiest societies are the ones with the least inequality divides.

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 17:36

Again, what is the point of going to university for 4 years, taking on debt, getting an education, and working a very hard and very needed job if at the end of it you have to work far harder for less money than someone who left school with no qualifications?

that argument doesn’t really work because a junior doctor doesn’t stay a junior doctor on 32k and they will also have a better pension than someone on minimum wage.

Bossygal · 30/10/2024 17:37

PinkFruitbat · 30/10/2024 17:35

I think the last leader to be bold like this was Maggie. It’s not pretty but you have to be honest, and tough.

Maggie never did this. It’s laughable to compare them. The last leader who was bold like this was liz truss.

Peoplearebloodyidiots · 30/10/2024 17:37

frozendaisy · 30/10/2024 17:05

When someone works like a bastard full time on minimum wage, but still has to think about putting the heating on, or has a sinking feeling when their child outgrows their shoes then yes something has gone wrong.

The wealthy thinking people's despair is jealousy is quite blinkered.

Not everyone desires a 4 bed detached with a range rover on the drive but every hard worker deserves to not choose between heating and shoes.

It's that level of low wage that needs concentrating on for once.

So higher earners or those considered wealthy should subside those on minimum wage?

PinkFruitbat · 30/10/2024 17:39

frozendaisy · 30/10/2024 17:36

We have lost the £12k tax free amount at the bottom of the scale, even with ploughing as much as possible into pensions etc.

It's not about how much you pay, it's how much do you need?

I guess it's different outlooks, when more people are thriving, happy, buoyant, then for us life is happier, more enjoyable, buoyant. Being in a gilded castle with other prince and princesses all slapping each other on the back for them all being just super whilst the plebs freeze is weird to us.

The happiest societies are the ones with the least inequality divides.

That’s socialism. It doesn’t work.

MrsMurphyIWish · 30/10/2024 17:39

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 17:34

That would stabilise the budget and enable massive reform of public sector pensions (far too generous, and funded from direct taxation), and massive reform of state pensions (unfortunately they need to be means tested any for only those who have nothing else to fall back on.

How would that work? Look at the furore re means testing winter fuel, the current pensioners would revolt over means testing the state pension. I agree some public sector pensions are very generous but we would see more strikes.

There was a reform of public sector pensions in 2012 (?) so those of us in our 40s won’t have “generous” packages. For the next decade there will be big pay outs but they will slowly decrease.

PinkFruitbat · 30/10/2024 17:40

Bossygal · 30/10/2024 17:37

Maggie never did this. It’s laughable to compare them. The last leader who was bold like this was liz truss.

I’m talking about structural reform.

Skybluecoat · 30/10/2024 17:40

Peoplearebloodyidiots · 30/10/2024 17:37

So higher earners or those considered wealthy should subside those on minimum wage?

Well yeah.

From each according to his means to each according to his need. Or something like that.

It’s the basis of civilised society.

PinkFruitbat · 30/10/2024 17:41

MrsMurphyIWish · 30/10/2024 17:39

There was a reform of public sector pensions in 2012 (?) so those of us in our 40s won’t have “generous” packages. For the next decade there will be big pay outs but they will slowly decrease.

Circa 28% employer contribution is huge!

WanOvaryKenobi · 30/10/2024 17:41

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 17:36

Again, what is the point of going to university for 4 years, taking on debt, getting an education, and working a very hard and very needed job if at the end of it you have to work far harder for less money than someone who left school with no qualifications?

that argument doesn’t really work because a junior doctor doesn’t stay a junior doctor on 32k and they will also have a better pension than someone on minimum wage.

And they will be paying full whack for childcare and very high taxes. To cover the fact that half the country is a net drain. But in the meantime you are making it extremely unappealing. We will have more trained people leave to different countries.

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 17:41

@MrsMurphyIWish im in the public sector, yes my scheme isn’t as good as it was but I still get a very good employer contribution.

Windchimesandsong · 30/10/2024 17:42

Peoplearebloodyidiots · 30/10/2024 17:37

So higher earners or those considered wealthy should subside those on minimum wage?

It works both ways. The lower waged, who are the majority compared to the highest earners, subsidise the economy, by keeping companies in business - and by extension the highest earners. Without the lower waged the economy would collapse.

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 17:43

PinkFruitbat · 30/10/2024 17:13

I just might. And lots of other golden geese might just leave too. I’m sure the UK will be just fine without us!

In general*, you haven’t got a chance in hell of getting a visa to live in the US.
might be worth having a look around at how many countries like giving residence visas to old people before you get carried away with your big exit threats 😂

*no doubt you have dual US citizenship, but 99.9999% of British golden geese won’t be as lucky 😏

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 17:44

And they will be paying full whack for childcare and very high taxes.

Thats true for many though, not just junior doctors.

.To cover the fact that half the country is a net drain.

we have an ageing population which is going to be expensive but it is what it is. Yes some people will emigrate, my parents did but not everyone will.

theemptinessmachine · 30/10/2024 17:44

"From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs."

It didn't work for Karl Marx either 🙄

AquaPeer · 30/10/2024 17:44

WanOvaryKenobi · 30/10/2024 17:41

And they will be paying full whack for childcare and very high taxes. To cover the fact that half the country is a net drain. But in the meantime you are making it extremely unappealing. We will have more trained people leave to different countries.

another thing constantly threatened but not materialised- not even after the disastrous mini budget did all these high earning graduate parents flee to these mysterious countries where they will be taxed less and work and adapt freely 🙄

the80sweregreat · 30/10/2024 17:46

A few people I know have children in their early to late 20s. One has moved to Dubai to work , one has gone to another country to work as a teacher and one has emigrated to Australia. All have degrees from English universities and the subsequent fees to pay back , but none of them saw much of a future here. It is sad , but maybe if they did see more of a future and house prices were not so high , then maybe we could keep them. I'm sure this isn't unusual across the country too.

frozendaisy · 30/10/2024 17:47

Peoplearebloodyidiots · 30/10/2024 17:37

So higher earners or those considered wealthy should subside those on minimum wage?

Yes. Is the short answer.
In terms of a country's budget, not individuals, recognising that low paid does not mean unessential and each hard working human deserves a basic level of existence, whether that's shoes or heating is just the decent thing to do.

Or does decency decline the richer you become?

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 17:48

We never recovered from 08 and wages have stagnated massively, low interest rates just masked it. It will take years to fix, if it can be fixed. I thought this budget was fairly sensible in trying to readdress some of those issues and the starved public services. At the end of the day nobody wants to pay more and everyone thinks that someone else should pay more.

Another2Cats · 30/10/2024 17:49

WanOvaryKenobi · 30/10/2024 17:35

Do you think an extra 6k above minimum wage is fair?

Do you think it is fair for some of our brightest and hardworking young people to take on thousands of pounds of debt and thousands of hours of training and education to earn little more than someone with no qualifications?

Would you like the person with no qualifications making decisions about your health?

That is just for the first year of training. Their pay goes up quite a bit after that.

FY1 - £32,400
FY2 - £37,300
CT1 - £43,900
CT2 - £43,900
CT3/ST3 - £55,300

So, a doctor going into their fifth year will be on £55,300. Over the course of four years their salary goes from £32k to £55k.

BlossomToLeaves · 30/10/2024 17:49

Will there be a spring budget, does anyone know? Or is it now just once a year?

LlynTegid · 30/10/2024 17:49

PinkFruitbat · 30/10/2024 17:40

I’m talking about structural reform.

I would argue some of Nigel Lawson's budgets were a form of structural reform.

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 17:49

It is sad , but maybe if they did see more of a future and house prices were not so high , then maybe we could keep them. I'm sure this isn't unusual across the country too.

Housing is such an issue and has really fucked the economy. If younger people feel they can get on the ladder and make a life for themselves more will be inclined to stay.

Mlanket · 30/10/2024 17:50

@Another2Cats quite.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread