Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Sir Keir Starmer declares gifts and freebies totalling more than £100,000 - the highest of any MP

447 replies

TealTraybake · 18/09/2024 22:49

Perhaps the Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire needs his freebies because MPs aren’t paid enough. Or perhaps he’s just the knight commander of the most astonishing hypocrisy.

Sir Keir Starmer declares gifts and freebies totalling more than £100,000 - the highest of any MP
OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
BrigadierEtienneGerard · 19/09/2024 19:48

Still rather have him than any of his five predecessors.

Harvestfestivalknickers · 19/09/2024 19:53

BrigadierEtienneGerard · 19/09/2024 19:48

Still rather have him than any of his five predecessors.

Sad but true. Its depressing to judge the Government's performance just a bit less shit than the previous.

EasternStandard · 19/09/2024 19:59

Harvestfestivalknickers · 19/09/2024 19:53

Sad but true. Its depressing to judge the Government's performance just a bit less shit than the previous.

This will have taken the shine off but the real test will be growing the economy

Screamingabdabz · 19/09/2024 20:06

Why can’t we just have a single fucker in charge who is there for the public greater good and not some grabby cunt out for themselves every single time??? A single solitary person with integrity. Why is it so rare?

Flibflobflibflob · 19/09/2024 20:11

He’s worth something like 7 million, he can buy his own bloody glasses. He just looks grabby. Loads of people have to watch football on the tele.

The point is that he sold himself on being different, ethical, above it all having the moral high ground etc.

Fairyliz · 19/09/2024 20:11

goestheweasel · 19/09/2024 13:02

I find it quite funny that the right are desperately trying to push this as "shocking" news because it's all they've got, but seem to have forgotten we've spent 10+ years of the Tories handing literally millions to their buddies, literally breaking the law at times, and you want us to be upset over £100,000? Or £5000 worth of dresses? I'm afraid I'm a little bit desensitised as to what shocks me after the last decade plus.

I don’t think it’s the amount as much as the hypocrisy. The Labour Party try and portray themselves as the kind decent party who try to do the right thing.
Unfortunately when it comes down to it they all have their snouts in the trough they are just as bad as the tories.

derxa · 19/09/2024 20:32

Screamingabdabz · 19/09/2024 20:06

Why can’t we just have a single fucker in charge who is there for the public greater good and not some grabby cunt out for themselves every single time??? A single solitary person with integrity. Why is it so rare?

Exactly

Kelly51 · 19/09/2024 21:28

@TealTraybake
I live in Scotland where uni isn't just for the rich.

TealTraybake · 19/09/2024 21:41

Kelly51 · 19/09/2024 21:28

@TealTraybake
I live in Scotland where uni isn't just for the rich.

For now..

OP posts:
HappiestSleeping · 19/09/2024 21:47

Harvestfestivalknickers · 19/09/2024 16:01

Not for me it's not. Once again, why is it acceptable for Government Ministers to accept gifts and not the CS?

Because they are the rules we have collectively voted for. If we don't like it, we should lobby the MPs to change the rules, not moan about people implementing the rules correctly.

HappiestSleeping · 19/09/2024 21:57

TealTraybake · 19/09/2024 18:41

It’s a principle. You know the ones Labour driven about. They have none and that is crystal clear.

I disagree. They are working within the rules. Nothing wrong with that. I don't recall them ever saying that no gifts would be accepted.

PoachesPeaches · 19/09/2024 22:07

Honestly don't care. He's the leader so of course it would be higher. Over 5 years, it's not that excessive.

PR is part of the job and anyone who thinks it isn't is mistaken.

If he was arseing around and not doing his job then yes I would care.

Harvestfestivalknickers · 19/09/2024 22:08

HappiestSleeping · 19/09/2024 21:47

Because they are the rules we have collectively voted for. If we don't like it, we should lobby the MPs to change the rules, not moan about people implementing the rules correctly.

Sadly they have proven they don't interpret the rules correctly time and time again.

User6874356 · 19/09/2024 22:10

BrigadierEtienneGerard · 19/09/2024 19:48

Still rather have him than any of his five predecessors.

dont see that he’s any better than rishi at the moment. Although I didn’t vote for either

ihatecoffee · 19/09/2024 22:14

TeaMistress · 19/09/2024 13:12

He's a sleazy opportunistic greedy cunt. His wife is no better. Shameless freeloaders trying to get their hands on whatever they can.

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

User6874356 · 19/09/2024 22:15

BurbageBrook · 19/09/2024 19:40

@Harvestfestivalknickers OK, but if they are declared, then any conflicts of interest will be obvious. I can't see how Lady Starmer receiving a free dress to wear for press photos is going to influence policy decisions. It's really not the big deal the right wing press are making it out to be. And it pales in comparison to Tory corruption!

What are you alleging re “Tory corruption”? Receiving hundreds of thousands of pounds of gift could well influence policy- that’s clearly the intention

upinaballoon · 19/09/2024 22:15

If a donor wants to give a P.M. an extravagant gift I don't see that that makes the P.M. a grabby cunt.

HappiestSleeping · 19/09/2024 22:23

Harvestfestivalknickers · 19/09/2024 22:08

Sadly they have proven they don't interpret the rules correctly time and time again.

That isn't unique to Labour though. They're all guilty of that. Conservatives most of all.

Iwishicouldflyhigh · 19/09/2024 22:25

HappiestSleeping · 19/09/2024 21:57

I disagree. They are working within the rules. Nothing wrong with that. I don't recall them ever saying that no gifts would be accepted.

No they aren’t. He didn’t declare the donor’s money used to buy his wife’s clothes.

Screamingabdabz · 19/09/2024 22:25

upinaballoon · 19/09/2024 22:15

If a donor wants to give a P.M. an extravagant gift I don't see that that makes the P.M. a grabby cunt.

People in business have protocols where there are conflicts of interests or integrity is seen to be in question. My DH has in the past refused World Cup tickets, expensive bottles of whisky, corporate favours etc to be seen to be above board professionally. No one even knew about it. But it was the right thing to do morally.

If Starmer was decent, he’d have said ‘thanks but no thanks - donate it to charity.’

Harvestfestivalknickers · 19/09/2024 22:26

Breaches in Parliamentary rules of conduct are investigated by the Commissioner of Standards, a role independent of the House of Commons. We don't collectively vote for the rules.

TeaMistress · 19/09/2024 22:27

upinaballoon · 19/09/2024 22:15

If a donor wants to give a P.M. an extravagant gift I don't see that that makes the P.M. a grabby cunt.

Yep it does. He's a grabby cunt who exchanges freebies from wealthy donors for inappropriate access to sensitive places.. It's cronyism. He allowed a donor unfettered access to Downing Street because he paid for Vicky Sponges dress and Free Gear Keirs glasses. He and his sponger wife have their snout firmly in the public purse and they don't seem bothered about the shockingly bad optics....they are as corrupt as the tories were. Their shameless attempt to portray themselves as a party of decency and public service has failed...now we all see them for what they are....just another greedy dirty corrupt PM and his assorted corrupt hangers on...

Screamingabdabz · 19/09/2024 22:28

HappiestSleeping · 19/09/2024 22:23

That isn't unique to Labour though. They're all guilty of that. Conservatives most of all.

The hypocrisy stinks more with Labour though. They take everyone for mugs when they claim they’re for social justice and equality. Are they fuck. They are in it for what they can get.

HappiestSleeping · 19/09/2024 22:29

Iwishicouldflyhigh · 19/09/2024 22:25

No they aren’t. He didn’t declare the donor’s money used to buy his wife’s clothes.

Yes he did. He missed the deadline as he was verifying the category and exactly what needed to be declared, and in fact it had already been declared while this was in progress. He wasn't trying to hide anything.

Iwishicouldflyhigh · 19/09/2024 22:31

HappiestSleeping · 19/09/2024 22:29

Yes he did. He missed the deadline as he was verifying the category and exactly what needed to be declared, and in fact it had already been declared while this was in progress. He wasn't trying to hide anything.

so he didn’t follow the rules then, did he? He missed the deadline!!

Swipe left for the next trending thread