Are people that thick that they believe this story?
Seriously.
We already have pay per mile taxed road usage. It's called duty on fuel.
We DO need to develop a replacement for it, if government strategy is for electric cars because we have to replace lost revenue but that's a long term thing otherwise you completely undermine green policy anyway.
In terms of an October timeframe, Rachel Reeves could just save the hassle and resign if she attempted this unilaterally as part of the budget.
You do realise there's plenty of Labour MPs in constituencies outside London who want to retain their seats, don't you?
If Starmer wanted a major back bench revolt, this would be a sure fire way to start one.
Long term I do think we are looking at black boxes in cars to car per mile based on local zones. So say you are using certain streets for short journeys in cities with good public transport on those routes at certain times you might be charged vastly different person mile than someone living in the Highlands. And there would be discounted/free rates for disabilities. Dynamic pricing if you will.
This would require significant investment and third party technology (big contract here for someone).
I'd bet this is part of that process and gaining support for the idea.
By suggesting something unacceptable it makes other options more palatable remember.
Pay per mile from October isn't a policy that's happening nor even being considered seriously.
It might be that budget is given to research and development of a new model of taxation for roads but that's it (and that'll still be minimal at this stage).