Request an EHCNA even if you intend to EHE. Then, if you change your mind at a later date, your circumstances change suddenly, or you decide to pursue EOTAS if attending a setting is inappropriate, you already have the EHCP.
EHE'ing or intending to EHE isn’t a lawful reason for refusing to assess or issue an EHCP. While EHE means the LA is no longer responsible for providing the provision in F of an EHCP, the EHCP doesn’t cease just because you EHE and you do not have to provide the provision in F or meet the outcomes in E. What you have to do is meet the needs in B but that can be in a different way to the provision set out in F.
Think about the support, including therapies such as SALT and OT, DD will need and if you have the financial resources to be able to provide the support DD needs. Meeting a child’s needs can be extremely expensive. NHS provision, especially for SIOT, is poor and patchy in comparison to what can be secured via an EHCP (although it may take appealing). And while a minority of LAs in a minority of situations give personal budgets to those EHEing with EHCPs, they don’t have to; is not common or guaranteed, and it often isn’t at the level of what can be secured when you aren’t EHEing.
An EHCP doesn’t have to equal attending school if that isn’t appropriate. Many don’t realise EOTAS/EOTIS is possible. This can be a bespoke package. For some it looks exactly like EHE but funded by the LA. The benefit of EOTAS rather than EHE is EOTAS can provide far more than the vast majority of parents can afford to fund EHE'ing. That is not a criticism of parents who EHE, more a statement of what EOTAS can include.
special schools are wonderful and do so much for the children to support them holistically.
That very much depends on the school. Some are wonderful. Others are far from wonderful. Some are actively harmful.