Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

A third child has died in Southport.

618 replies

Conniebygaslight · 30/07/2024 12:21

Incomprehensible and senseless. Absolutely devastating. 💔💔💔

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Ilikeadrink14 · 30/07/2024 17:26

SpudleyLass · 30/07/2024 17:14

I do think he should be named. Before his 18th birthday.

I've always had faith in the justice system, perhaps unfairly so given recent events, but I can no longer abide all the rights being afforded to perps and none to victims and the otherwise vulnerable.

Name him.

Well said! I wrote a post with the same sentiment but it was deleted! I said nothing out of turn. Who are these people that they can just wipe our opinions off the page?? ( this will e eyed nw, n doubt - they can’t abide criticism, however justified!

WearyAuldWumman · 30/07/2024 17:26

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 30/07/2024 17:24

We can't, but the crossbows and zombie knives used in some recent attacks could be banned. Nobody needs those.

Yup. I had a pupil whose parents gifted him a crossbow for his Christmas. There were later reports of swan found dead with a crossbow bolt through its neck.

SpudleyLass · 30/07/2024 17:27

IdaGlossop · 30/07/2024 17:22

What exactly would any of us not involved gain by knowing his name at this point, other than the fleeting satisfaction of knowing?

What exactly is gained by allowing him to not to be named?

The justice system has swung too far i favour of the guilty.

Loss of trust in the justice system can also lead to vigilante justice.

Name him.

His victims and their families pain are out there for all to see, their privacy intruded upon.

So should his be.

roxyro · 30/07/2024 17:27

Marseillaise · 30/07/2024 17:19

How does catching him at the scene tell us anything about whether he had the required mental capacity to form the necessary intent which is an essential part of what needs to be established to convict someone of murder?

Catching a taxi to the event. Taking a knife with him then launching into what must have been a frenzied attack, in order to injure as many children and adults as he did, certainly shows intent.

i despair when I read some of these comments. I accept he may have MH issues but let’s not get carried away. He had a determination to kill as many children as possible and attacked the adults that tried to stop him.

BillyNoMates9 · 30/07/2024 17:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

WearyAuldWumman · 30/07/2024 17:28

Marseillaise · 30/07/2024 17:13

You are mistaken. Currently we don't know that he committed any crime. He might have been incapable of forming the requisite intention, for instance.

Even if we did know, killing him in cold blood and accompanying it with torture would reduce us as a society to a level below that of any criminal.

Edited

He randomly took a taxi to a building full of women and girls?

GreenyBlues · 30/07/2024 17:28

helpfulperson · 30/07/2024 14:25

But where does this end? Should we not take children to the local park in groups or to the cinema etc? There are loads of places someone could predict there would be groups of children and do something like this. This is horrendously awful but incredibly rare.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-60236157
It happened in a Bolton park two years. The perpetrator was female, with known Schizophrenia. I don't know what the answer is.

Emily Jones

Emily Jones: Bolton child's killer loses appeal against sentence

Eltiona Skana admitted the manslaughter of Emily Jones on the grounds of diminished responsibility.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-60236157

SpudleyLass · 30/07/2024 17:28

Marseillaise · 30/07/2024 17:26

Technically, we don't even know that much. I know it's wildly unlikely, but suppose for instance his case is that someone took the knife off him, he never intended to use it and didn't use it?

MN keeps asking people to stop speculating and making assumptions. The focus at this point should be on the victims.

Edited

Oh do come on.

I'm trying to not respond to this with anger.

He was at the scene and caught by the police. Having attacked as many people as he did, the evidence is clear.

I have no interest in defending him. I hope he gets a life sentence too. He does not deserve to see the light of day again.

Ilikeadrink14 · 30/07/2024 17:29

Ilikeadrink14 · 30/07/2024 17:26

Well said! I wrote a post with the same sentiment but it was deleted! I said nothing out of turn. Who are these people that they can just wipe our opinions off the page?? ( this will e eyed nw, n doubt - they can’t abide criticism, however justified!

Sorry, the gobbledygook in the brackets should have said….’this will be deleted now no doubt’

Dylanesque · 30/07/2024 17:29

Marseillaise · 30/07/2024 17:24

Goodness, there are some hard of thinking posts popping up on this thread.

Definition of murder: Killing someone with the intent to unlawfully cause death or serious injury. If you are so mentally unwell that you are incapable of forming intent, you cannot commit murder.

At this stage we don't know enough to make assumptions about that, and making those assumptions publicly may well be contempt of court.

Goodness, there's enough mainstream info to know that he was compos mentis enough to book a taxi there. As for 'hard of thinking', I don't need to do much thinking at all to not be an apologist for a murderous male

WearyAuldWumman · 30/07/2024 17:30

I'm sick of excuses being made. The teenager that I mentioned upthread got a light sentence for a "first offence". He wore a ski mask and used a knife. He planned it, no doubt.

EsmaCannonball · 30/07/2024 17:34

ThatSnappyPlumBear · 30/07/2024 12:30

This is an odd post.
It is horrendous news, absolutely heartbreaking for those involved, however, it is also extremely rare.
I can only think of two incidents in my life where something similar has happened. Dunblane and an incident in a midlands nursery before that.

There was also an incident in 1994 when a man entered a classroom at Hall Garth secondary school armed with a gun and a knife, separated the boys from the girls and started stabbing the girls. One girl died. It would have been worse if two teachers hadn't managed to overpower him.

PandoraSox · 30/07/2024 17:34

Ilikeadrink14 · 30/07/2024 16:59

When coming across atrocities like this, against children, whether it be one child or many who are affected, my late husband always said the same thing. Whether it was child cruelty, rape, assault, a situation like this or similar, he always said that the perpetrator should be put into a room full of mothers,
and the door shut. No recriminations, of course. It would be a far more effective punishment than a custodial sentence which comes with perks and early release. And my husband was one of the gentlest, kindest people I know.
I’m not religious but I will pray tonight for those victims and their families. I wish them strength and peace.

Margaret Atwood wrote about this, or at least something similar. Particution. A dystopian concept and one that has no place at all in civilised society.

EasternStandard · 30/07/2024 17:35

Growsomeballswoman · 30/07/2024 16:03

What were the crowds shouting at Kier Starmer?

How many more children will die? And you’ve got your photo and go away

TooBigForMyBoots · 30/07/2024 17:36

SpudleyLass · 30/07/2024 17:22

He has still killed.

Therefore, we know he has committed a crime.

Severity may differ, but a crime has been committed and he was there with the evidence needed to prove he did indeed commit a crime.

He should be named.

A judge can decide to name him before the age of 18 and after considering the evidence. There's a good reason why child suspects are not named.

Toasticles · 30/07/2024 17:37

In all seriousness the banning of the placing of cookies and use of social media algorithms to show people more and more of things they are interested in would probably help. It's so easy to get radicalised in all sorts of ways.

Of course he had mental health problems. You don't go into a room full of little girls dancing and stab them if you are sane. Whether it was pure schizophrenia or some kind of perceived slight or injustice or peadophilia or whatever else reason he may have thought justified his actions, he was/is clearly completely fucked in the head.

SpudleyLass · 30/07/2024 17:39

TooBigForMyBoots · 30/07/2024 17:36

A judge can decide to name him before the age of 18 and after considering the evidence. There's a good reason why child suspects are not named.

I think if we can allow certain things to happen at 16, we should also allow the naming of suspects tbh.

Especially a spree killer.

I appreciate what you're saying, but the pendulumn has swung too far in favour of the guilty. Which we all know he is.

SpudleyLass · 30/07/2024 17:39

Toasticles · 30/07/2024 17:37

In all seriousness the banning of the placing of cookies and use of social media algorithms to show people more and more of things they are interested in would probably help. It's so easy to get radicalised in all sorts of ways.

Of course he had mental health problems. You don't go into a room full of little girls dancing and stab them if you are sane. Whether it was pure schizophrenia or some kind of perceived slight or injustice or peadophilia or whatever else reason he may have thought justified his actions, he was/is clearly completely fucked in the head.

There is no evidence thus far he was mentally ill.

EasternStandard · 30/07/2024 17:40

Toasticles · 30/07/2024 17:37

In all seriousness the banning of the placing of cookies and use of social media algorithms to show people more and more of things they are interested in would probably help. It's so easy to get radicalised in all sorts of ways.

Of course he had mental health problems. You don't go into a room full of little girls dancing and stab them if you are sane. Whether it was pure schizophrenia or some kind of perceived slight or injustice or peadophilia or whatever else reason he may have thought justified his actions, he was/is clearly completely fucked in the head.

No one can say this and I wish they wouldn’t.

Whether the perpetrator has culpability for the atrocity is impacted in law by his mental state

IdaGlossop · 30/07/2024 17:40

SpudleyLass · 30/07/2024 17:27

What exactly is gained by allowing him to not to be named?

The justice system has swung too far i favour of the guilty.

Loss of trust in the justice system can also lead to vigilante justice.

Name him.

His victims and their families pain are out there for all to see, their privacy intruded upon.

So should his be.

Vigilante justice, including for the family members of the perpetrator, is far, far more likely if the perpetrator is named.

JudgeJ · 30/07/2024 17:41

LlamaNoDrama · 30/07/2024 16:03

Exclusion is the last thing they need. It will push them even more into the fringes of society which makes them much more vulnerable to being radicalised, getting dragged into county lines, turn to ropey communities, start believing shite spouted by only know who because they feel like they finally 'fit' somewhere.

So you prefer that the majority should have to suffer, and they do suffer, on the altar of keeping these in school.

We need to acknowledge that there is such a thing as evil, not everything can be swept under the carpet of 'issues'. Were we back in the 1960s I wonder what excuses would be being trotted out for Myra Hindley and Ian Brady, she no doubt would be under his control etc etc..

Uricon2 · 30/07/2024 17:41

SpudleyLass · 30/07/2024 17:39

There is no evidence thus far he was mentally ill.

There is also no evidence that he isn't.

None of us know the background yet. I'm doubtful even the police dealing with him have any sort of clear idea currently.

Cheesecakelunch · 30/07/2024 17:41

Absolutely heartbreaking. I shed a tear when I saw this.

This world is sick and terrifying😥

PandoraSox · 30/07/2024 17:42

SpudleyLass · 30/07/2024 17:27

What exactly is gained by allowing him to not to be named?

The justice system has swung too far i favour of the guilty.

Loss of trust in the justice system can also lead to vigilante justice.

Name him.

His victims and their families pain are out there for all to see, their privacy intruded upon.

So should his be.

I think Jacinda Ahern had the right idea about not mentioning a perpetrator's name:

"He sought many things from his act of terror, but one was notoriety - that is why you will never hear me mention his name,"

I expect this perpetrator's family is in hiding right now. Naming him could cause harm to come to them. It will make zero difference to him and it would not bring those poor children back.

SpudleyLass · 30/07/2024 17:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.