I’m an employer and initially I was very nervous about this. Not because I’m in the business of unfairly dismissing people, but because sometimes people start working for us, and just aren’t very good, and we have to move them along within their probationary period. If I had to deal with a long and complicated dismissal process every time I took someone on, I just wouldn’t hire people from the U.K., or seriously consider if responsibilities could be taken on by existing employees.
However, from what I have read, probationary periods will still apply.
Secondly - the pure hassle and cost of dealing with claims, even if you’re confident you haven’t done anything wrong, is so punitive, especially for small businesses. We have dealt with a disability discrimination claim before which we have written proof isn’t going to be successful, and yet it has still taken over 18 months of our previous employee refusing to consider the evidence and sticking to her position, and has cost us at least 25k to defend.
So anything that leads to increases in ability for people to claim is going to be costly and time consuming for employers.
In general I’m in favour of robust employee rights as we treat our employees very well, but the consequence will obviously be fewer people being taken a chance on. Eg we took on an 18 year old who was keen but with zero experience - knowing that if he was hopeless we could move him on. If we had the risk of a claim from day 1 we would not have taken that chance (he luckily wasn’t hopeless!)