If you mean my comment, you could just take issue with what I said. Though they are statements of facts, so I don't know how you would do that.
Do you people really believe everything you read in the papers? Really? You don't ever think something is twisted or reworded or put in a different context? The bottom line is that he didn't write this. It is not his own column. And if he protests now, all the baying mob will double down on him. Why do you want a world where merely something a journalist writes about a person is enough to bring social media down on him like this?
I used to be a government press officer long ago. One day a journalist from the Times got really pissy about something our dept published, and asked how much the study cost. I said "that is not something we hold here in the press office but I will find out and call you straight back. When is your deadline?"
I called him well before. No reply, no voicemail. I kept trying. Next day in the Times, a really negative piece. Including "A government spokesperson said: We don't know how much this cost". Putting the govt and the department in a terrible light. Ammunition for the Opposition. Questions at PMQs. I could have lost my job.
So nowadays social media unleashes this torrent of judgemental abuse. Possibly trashing his reputation, doing him damage, affecting his family income in the future. All for something we don't even know he said...
I am not his publicity team or anything. I'm an old bat, also a mother of an adult autistic daughter. But truly. Do we want a world where this can happen? It could be you next.