Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Absolutely appalled by Kenneth Eugene Smith's execution

375 replies

Haunting10 · 26/01/2024 18:45

Appalled is too soft a word. I feel physically sick and angry.

What a sick world we live in.

I am against the death penalty. One person wrongly convicted and sentenced to death is too many. This particular case sounds like torture, and to use what the Nazis used on millions, its just disturbing on so many levels.

I keep thinking about it. But what can we do? I'm in UK, and expect any activism will be happening in US.

What will happen to the state of Alabama? Surely something must be done. This was not human.

OP posts:
Gettingbysomehow · 28/01/2024 10:37

Why are you upset by this particular one. They are all awful.
The electric chair, injecting drugs that may or may not burn their way into their system while they are still conscious.
Several countries practice absolutely painless euthanasia on terminal patients yet they use completely untested and barbaric methods to execute prisoners. Why are they not euthanising them with no pain like Dignitas or your local vet
This is the question we should all be asking as well as the question - mental torture from being on death row for 36 years. Either execute them straight after trial or not at all.

1975wasthebest · 28/01/2024 10:37

I would happily press the button (or whatever) and not flinch

You need help. I feel sorry for you.

ShortHairedCat · 28/01/2024 10:39

@Naptrappedmummy Absolutely agree. It’s not until you have someone on “the inside” (if you like) that you realise the level of sheer violence these people are capable of, a lot of them because they see no value in human life; not even their own x

Mouse82 · 28/01/2024 10:40

LiquoriceAllsort2 · 27/01/2024 21:01

I would imagine if you put the job advert up the queue would be quite long to apply.

I bet a lot of people would even do it for free.

Including executing your own child? Well if the shoe fits and all that you would be quite happy pushing the button on your own child.

Mouse82 · 28/01/2024 10:40

1975wasthebest · 28/01/2024 10:37

I would happily press the button (or whatever) and not flinch

You need help. I feel sorry for you.

I agree.
Imagine if the tables were turned and it was their own flesh and blood, their own child sitting in the chair

ShortHairedCat · 28/01/2024 10:42

1975wasthebest · 28/01/2024 10:37

I would happily press the button (or whatever) and not flinch

You need help. I feel sorry for you.

@1975wasthebest Do I? You try witnessing a family broken by a senseless murder. You have no idea so don’t speak to me like that. What good did “do-gooders” like you ever do

ShortHairedCat · 28/01/2024 10:44

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Quartz2208 · 28/01/2024 10:45

There is another thread which sets out the issues, pharmacutial companies won’t sell the drugs, no physician will be there to administer (against the Hippocratic oath) and the mental toll of being responsible for the death of another being is huge. No one should flippantly say they could do it because the toll it takes is massive

Anisette · 28/01/2024 10:45

It's precisely the people who say they would queue up to be executioners, do it without pay, and wouldn't flinch, who shouldn't do it. It's noticeable that all these bloodthirsty types aren't volunteering to be the prison warders taking the accused to his death, attaching the electrodes or putting the needles in, clearing up afterwards. That's because they can only contemplate it if they are distant from the dying person.

Mouse82 · 28/01/2024 10:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Psychopaths come from all walks of life, this thread is filled with them willing to push the button.

ShortHairedCat · 28/01/2024 10:51

@Mouse82 I’ve added my experience and my thoughts. I’m adding no more.x

Gettingbysomehow · 28/01/2024 10:54

Quartz2208 · 28/01/2024 10:45

There is another thread which sets out the issues, pharmacutial companies won’t sell the drugs, no physician will be there to administer (against the Hippocratic oath) and the mental toll of being responsible for the death of another being is huge. No one should flippantly say they could do it because the toll it takes is massive

I was thinking about this recently so how do people get round being euthanased at Dignitas, doctors must have prescribed the drugs there.

Mouse82 · 28/01/2024 11:06

ShortHairedCat · 28/01/2024 10:51

@Mouse82 I’ve added my experience and my thoughts. I’m adding no more.x

You seem like a really angry individual, I wish you all the best in your life. And I mean that sincerely.

dimllaishebiaith · 28/01/2024 11:09

Gettingbysomehow · 28/01/2024 10:54

I was thinking about this recently so how do people get round being euthanased at Dignitas, doctors must have prescribed the drugs there.

I thought the oath was "do no harm" not "don't kill"?

I can understand how allowing someone very ill, in a lot of pain etc, who isn't far from death, to die with dignity might be considered by some doctors to fall under the do no harm part of the oath

Tatumm · 28/01/2024 11:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

No mother believes that their child will kill, and yet all murderers have mothers…

Comedycook · 28/01/2024 11:19

It's so ridiculous to say you'd happily carry out an execution. Unless you're an absolute psychopath, the truth is it's probably incredibly difficult mentally. I don't think any of us have the right to take someone's life, even if they're evil killers. We shouldn't lower ourselves to their level. Some people on this thread sound quite deranged to be honest.

IncompleteSenten · 28/01/2024 11:21

@dimllaishebiaith I agree. There are times when doing nothing is causing more harm than doing something.

If there's going to be harm either way then do the thing that causes the least harm / does the most good / relieves the most pain.

Although was first do no harm ever even actually part of the pledge? Also, is it even the Hippocratic oath now? Or a more modern version?

Not that it matters really. It's best to do something where the primary purpose is to help the patient even if there is another effect. Eg relieving the pain of a person with terminal cancer even if the dose required shortens their life by days or weeks. Better that that them in agony, praying for death.

x2boys · 28/01/2024 12:25

LuluBlakey1 · 26/01/2024 19:32

I have never supported the death penalty but I now think I would. I have qualms about innocent people, mistakenly convicted, but where there is no doubt, as in this case, I think for murder or severe cases of sexual abuse, or acts of terrorism, I would support it. I can see no sense in keeping these people alive or allowing them to live in prison with any degree of comfort for the rest of their lives.
I would include in that people like the bloke who killed those people In Nottingham and who was on the news yesterday and the one who pushed the little French boy off the viewing gallery balcony of the Tate. I am uninterested in their mental illness - they knowingly and deliberately murdered someone, knew it was wrong, have expressed no remorse and I see no sense in them being locked up for life.
I think shooting is the cleanest, quickest option.

Edited

As abhorrent as the Nottingham killings were you clearly have no understanding of severe s mental.illness such as psychosis.

dimllaishebiaith · 28/01/2024 12:33

Comedycook · 28/01/2024 11:19

It's so ridiculous to say you'd happily carry out an execution. Unless you're an absolute psychopath, the truth is it's probably incredibly difficult mentally. I don't think any of us have the right to take someone's life, even if they're evil killers. We shouldn't lower ourselves to their level. Some people on this thread sound quite deranged to be honest.

I would have more respect for people who say they would be willing to be an executioner because they believe the death sentence is right, and they understand that it will be traumatic and probably impact them for the rest of their lives but they are willing to undergo that because they think its the best thing for society.

I wouldn't agree with them, but I would respect them for their opinion.

Its much harder to respect those on this thread who are making it out that it would be in any way appropriate to allow grieving family members to go through that trauma, or that they would be able to do it and come through it unscathed.

x2boys · 28/01/2024 12:38

LiquoriceAllsort2 · 27/01/2024 21:01

I would imagine if you put the job advert up the queue would be quite long to apply.

I bet a lot of people would even do it for free.

I bet there wouldn't be its easy to make statements like that when there's no chance you will ever be in a position to execute someone

CruCru · 28/01/2024 12:45

dimllaishebiaith · 28/01/2024 09:32

Picking up a corpse and picking up a severed head covered in blood is not the same thing, but its easy to have a casual attitude when you know its not you who will have to do it

I don’t think there is a way to kill someone that won’t either cause them suffering or leave a bloody mess for someone else to clear up (both, in the case of the electric chair). I am sure that collecting the remains of an executed prisoner is a job of responsibility. I expect that whenever an execution cell is used, it gets jet-washed afterwards - partly to stop those working in the prison from getting sick.

dimllaishebiaith · 28/01/2024 12:59

CruCru · 28/01/2024 12:45

I don’t think there is a way to kill someone that won’t either cause them suffering or leave a bloody mess for someone else to clear up (both, in the case of the electric chair). I am sure that collecting the remains of an executed prisoner is a job of responsibility. I expect that whenever an execution cell is used, it gets jet-washed afterwards - partly to stop those working in the prison from getting sick.

I don’t think there is a way to kill someone that won’t either cause them suffering or leave a bloody mess for someone else to clear up

I completely agree. It's one of the reasons I am against the death sentence.

It's just a wierd reason to use to justify making the process bloodier and messier. "Oh the prison officers already suffer and have to clean up mess so why not make them pick up severed heads, how much worse can it be?"

Daftasabroom · 28/01/2024 16:35

midmodmad · 27/01/2024 15:55

The post I quoted said

"where there is no doubt, as in this case, I think for murder or severe cases of sexual abuse, or acts of terrorism, I would support it"

The key words in this sentence are "where there is no doubt...."

Andrew Malkinson.

For every ten people on death row one is thought to be innocent.

I doubt that as a terrified teenager you've sat in a police cell and been told "we don't care whether you did it or not, we're going to fuckin get you for it"?

Daftasabroom · 28/01/2024 16:37

NoOrdinaryMorning · 27/01/2024 18:34

I respectfully but massively disagree. I'm glad he suffered. Many, many years too late. People like Ian Huntley, Brian Kohberger (IF guilty), Yorkshire Ripper & Moira Hunslet et al should all have/be given the exact same. They did farrrrrr worse to their innocent victims.

Why would you want anyone to suffer? You're a psychopath.

somekittenmittens · 28/01/2024 16:41

Anisette · 26/01/2024 19:51

He did not know that he would be held on death row for 35 years, be the victim of a badly botched and traumatic attempt at execution, and would ultimately be gassed.

Good, a quick death would be too good for someone who executed an innocent person and left two children without a mother

Swipe left for the next trending thread