I never understand these posts. My response was to someone saying that the woman may have been under threat; my point being that it could have been the man under threat. It wasn't directly responding to the dog attack, merely the assumption that it could only possibly be a woman under threat.
At no time did I say that I 'wanted to wait wait until one has a sibling argument and is mauled to death by another xl bully?' and am flummoxed where you decided that this is what I thought?
I don't believe these dogs have any place in any home, whether there are children there or not, but please, do carry on making stuff up in your head if you enjoy it.