Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Blimey! Victoria Coren Mitchell has had a second baby at 51

303 replies

Sidebeforeself · 01/11/2023 19:29

Congratulations to her. I caught up with OC last night and thought she looked pregnant but dismissed it when i remembered she’s around my age. Then i saw the announcement today. I’m knackered just thinking about it!

OP posts:
Draculasteachest · 01/11/2023 20:54

Amazing and incredible, all the best to them, I love news like this! Whether assisted or not I think it's super, she has a youthful energy about her for sure!

Grantshapscat · 01/11/2023 20:55

I’m astounded!

I’m 39 and knackered!

But I can’t afford help, maternity leave left us (literally) bankrupt and the strain of having no support network has brought our marriage to the brink.

I am sure with their resources they’ll just be able to enjoy all of the nice bits and at least Barbara will have a sibling when they’ve gone.

CheeseMuffin · 01/11/2023 20:55

elliejjtiny · 01/11/2023 20:24

Good for them. I wouldn't fancy having a baby at 41, never mind 51 though. When I was having my youngest at 32 I was the oldest by quite a long way in the maternity ward and the same age as one of the grannys.

I don't think being a gran at 32 is particularly common or desirable...

nettie434 · 01/11/2023 20:55

MariaLuna · 01/11/2023 19:34

Don't know who she is but pity the kid when he's 21 having a mother old enough to be his granny.

Hope she's sorted out all legal matters for him (will, who will take care of him etc.).

It is relevant to know who Victoria Coren Mitchell is before making that sort of comment. She and her husband met comparatively late and both thought that having children was something that might not happen for them. They were overjoyed to have their first child. They are wealthy enough to pay for any help that will make having two young children easier. Victoria Coren Mitchell looks as if she is one of those people whose biological age is younger than her chronological age so maybe that will help her too.

What about the older male pop stars like Mick Jagger who have babies in their 70s and 80s, like Mick Jagger? Are you worried about their children too?

Ducksurprise · 01/11/2023 20:58

Parents are older these days. The hang ups that people have due to older parents just don't seem to be prevalent these days

I've been both ends of the spectrum- I felt more judged as a young mum then as a 'geriatric' which was how they kindly labeled me when i had my last.

LuluBlakey1 · 01/11/2023 21:00

icewoman · 01/11/2023 19:38

never heard of the woman, but this was my first thought too. I had an aunt get pregnant at 51 - total accident. She decided against an abortion, but was well aware of the risks to herself and her child. Very luckily, they both survived the actual birth in good health, but predictably he became motherless in his teens.

As the average life expectancy for women is now 84, that is unlikely to be the 'predictable' outcome in this instance.

LittleGlowingOblong · 01/11/2023 21:00

My experience is that everything changes when you go through the menopause.

Fit as a fiddle to an old crock almost overnight. Though I think Covid restriction and WFH made it worse.

theduchessofspork · 01/11/2023 21:00

elliejjtiny · 01/11/2023 20:24

Good for them. I wouldn't fancy having a baby at 41, never mind 51 though. When I was having my youngest at 32 I was the oldest by quite a long way in the maternity ward and the same age as one of the grannys.

Where did you have your last baby that 32 was old?!

Chiaseedling · 01/11/2023 21:04

Wow!
my mum had me at 42 - I often think that I’d only have a 10 year old now if that was me and how much less fit/well I am than I was 10 years ago and I’d find it tough going.

Sanguinello · 01/11/2023 21:05

I like the name June Violet

Energydrink · 01/11/2023 21:06

I cannot believe she is 51 … I thought she was at least 10 years younger!

AllThatFancyPaintsAsFair · 01/11/2023 21:06

theduchessofspork · 01/11/2023 21:00

Where did you have your last baby that 32 was old?!

1973 😂

Groundhoghcg · 01/11/2023 21:06

Not what i'd choose, but then I haven't lived their lives or had their resources.

I'm very sure the child would on balance prefer to have been born to her mother at 55 than not born.

hellohellothere · 01/11/2023 21:07

@AllThatFancyPaintsAsFair things have changed in 50 years!

LuluBlakey1 · 01/11/2023 21:07

theriseandfallofFranklinSaint · 01/11/2023 20:23

I think they're both far too old and could not think of anything worse 😳

Really? Living in a war zone with your child? Cancer? Domestic violence? Rape? Child abuse? All less terrible than two intelligent, healthy, successful, happily married, slightly older than the norm, people having a baby. Don't be so ridiculous.

Bergamotte · 01/11/2023 21:08

Xenia · 01/11/2023 19:37

Good for her. I got some Durham history records today (not my family) but these two mothers were certainly churning out the babies - 20 sons -amazing number. I suppose you might even start at 14 or 16 in the 1700s UK in those days and go up from there.

  • 29 Apr 1798 Hannah Stanley, born 20 Apr 1798, 15th daughter, 21st child of Joseph Stanley (gunsmith, native of Great Barr, Staffordshire) by his wife Diana Riley (native of this parish)
  • 2 Mar 1800 Patrick Mullen, born 14 Feb 1800, 20th son of Patrick Mullen (invalid, native of Ireland) by his wife Ann late Drummond formerly Carr (native of Ireland)

Wow!

I do wonder at the phrasing though. Do they mean:
"21st child of Joseph Stanley by his wife Diana Riley." So the 21st child that Joseph and Diana have had together.

Or "21st child of Joseph Stanley. This child born by his wife Diana Riley." So Joseph could have fathered 11 children with a first wife, who then died. Then he married again and fathered 10 children with wife number 2, Diana.

It is of course impressive either way. And of course before we had effective contraception, lots of women had to just keep getting pregnant until they: a) Died in childbirth, b) Reached menopause, or c) Had some sort of birth injury which left them infertile (often seems to happen in books!)

TotalOverhaul · 01/11/2023 21:08

CobwebsAndCauldrons · 01/11/2023 19:46

Yeah - odd that David is only a couple of years younger than VCM and no one is commenting on his age.

Congratulations to them both.

Edited

He didn't have to carry the baby to term at his age!

grottyb · 01/11/2023 21:09

It’s a fact that its unusual and harder work when you are older thats all

They are rich though, it helps.

Beetlebumz · 01/11/2023 21:10

No age is guaranteed. My dad had me aged 34 and died suddenly when I was 16. Good luck to them. Don’t envy them the teen years in their 60s, but they are shit however old you are! 😂

PiIIock · 01/11/2023 21:11

ElaineMBenes · 01/11/2023 20:24

These days, not so much, but this child is still unlikely to have her parents around if/when she gives birth herself.

My mum had me when she was sixteen. She died before I had children.

But neither having a child at 16 nor dying young are common.

Death is more likely as on get older, we all know this.

People cannot have it all. You cannot have a baby at 51 and magically expect to cheat death. Every single one of us makes trade offs in life.

If you have a baby late, you may have more money - but you are much more likely to die when your children are young adults. Fact. No getting around it, and there's no shame in it.

grottyb · 01/11/2023 21:12

Death is more likely as on get older, we all know this.

And we know that richer people live longer.

sandyhappypeople · 01/11/2023 21:13

SauvignonBlanche · 01/11/2023 19:47

Good point.

Why is it a good point? Men's fertility doesn't decline at the same rate as women's, it's no surprise that he's fathered a child at that age.

It's more of a risk for a women to have a child at that age, that may be where the comments are coming from.

good luck to them, they both seem lovely.

LimeCheesecake · 01/11/2023 21:13

it is interesting that now we’ve had a couple of generations having good access to contraception, the very notion it’s possible to get pregnant and carry a baby to term in your early 50s seems insane.

of course it was normal to have babies up until menopause a few generations back. Most woman haven’t gone through the menopause at 50/51. It’s a higher risk pregnancy but not an impossible one.

Id assume an 8 year gap between dcs plus not announcing a pregnancy until after a safe delivery would mean they’ve had some heartbreak along the way to completing their family, but equally could be an unplanned one. Particularly given how many woman on here seem to think you can’t get pregnant without medical assistance at 50 - all the 50-somethings who haven’t gone through the menopause, you do still need to use contraceptives if the idea of being pregnant now scares you!

PiIIock · 01/11/2023 21:14

grottyb · 01/11/2023 21:12

Death is more likely as on get older, we all know this.

And we know that richer people live longer.

Anyone can die of cancer, heart disease, stroke etc. Being rich isn't some magic shield against nature.

Rich people aren't living til 200 and cheating death. They're still mortals like us. They die in their 60s, 70s 80s and if they're lucky, 90+

Swipe left for the next trending thread