The prosecution say murder, which the post-mortem results baldly contradict, by citing natural causes, as cause of death, they are mutually exclusive. Some dismissing the PM's as just coming to different conclusions, should give themselves a shake, the PM's were carried out by pathologists, who were there. Not one called, or a statement from any admitted into evidence. Also the Coroner of the day, who refused to revisit his pathologists findings of death by natural causes, was neither called nor any affidavit produced into evidence.
Interestingly Dr Evans told the court he didn't claim to be an expert witness, merely " Dr Evans said he had called himself a medical independent witness, not as an expert, and he had come to assist the court on challenging medicla issues"
Dr Evans dissemination of evidence has been heavily criticised by Judges in other cases, in which he appeared, Ben Myers had good reason for opposing his inclusion as a witness, notwithstanding Evans totally misrepresenting how he was a witness in the first place.
There is more than enough reasons to have these verdicts revisited, in the interests of Justice for all.
However I am aware that there are those, who need someone to be guilty, indeed someone may be guilty, or multiple people may be culpable of lower than acceptable professional care.
Whatever it is, I am hopeful that the babies, the parents and all else will see true justice done in their names, however that justice falls.