Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Was the young Queen Victoria incredibly beautiful or nay?

248 replies

MorrisZapp · 22/07/2023 17:42

Movies and TV suggest she was stunning as a young woman, but all the pictures of her that are widely familiar today are of a plain fizzog.

Was she hot or not?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
LadyVictoriaSponge · 22/07/2023 22:44

I didn’t realise she was an extra in the film and I had to do a double take!

AnnunciataZ · 22/07/2023 22:52

Fidelina · 22/07/2023 22:25

Henry V— hot or not? Charles II? George VI — fat or fit?

Or are we just criticising the appearance of female monarchs?

If you have to ask the question re Charles II then back to the history books with you! 😜

RitzyMcFitzy · 22/07/2023 22:57

Charles II would have shown you a good time for sure. His father, not so much.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

QueenOfThorns · 22/07/2023 22:58

That picture of Princess Beatrice posted earlier looks remarkably like this portrait of Victoria!

QueenOfThorns · 22/07/2023 22:59

THIS portrait!

Was the young Queen Victoria incredibly beautiful or nay?
FannyCradocksDoughnut · 22/07/2023 23:03

Chinless, beaky nose and jowls. Not your classic beauty...

Sausagenbacon · 22/07/2023 23:04

There's a great book (sorry, can't remember the title) about, when it became clear that George iv would have an heir, his brothers raced to produce one.
I love the fact that when anaesthesia was developed, some churchmen felt that it shouldn't be given to women in childbirth, and she roundly told them to take a jump.

Sausagenbacon · 22/07/2023 23:05

Would NOT have an heir. After his daughter, and only child, died in childbirth.

N0ëlle · 22/07/2023 23:26

Beatrice is a LOT better looking.

Gingerkittykat · 22/07/2023 23:31

GrannyAchingsShepherdsHut · 22/07/2023 18:21

I think it's hard to jusge because in every photo and portrait, no matter her age, she looks absolutely miserable. It might be that a smile changed her face completely.

I know smiling in photos wasn't a thing then, as you had to stay still for so long, but dear god she looks like she's chewing a wasp.

This picture is quite interesting, and she looks quite attractive I think with modern hair and makeup. It's hard to see past her very very unflattering (by modern standards) hair etc in a lot of pictures I think. They also seem to make a big deal of her eyelids in paintings, that aren't quite so droopy in photos. Perhaps it was fashionable. Demure maybe? Dunno.

She looks like Sonia from Eastenders here!

blackheartsgirl · 23/07/2023 00:37

her face transformed when she smiled I think.

there are a few photos of her smiling taken when she was older

blackheartsgirl · 23/07/2023 00:38

This one

Was the young Queen Victoria incredibly beautiful or nay?
MyGuineaPigIs007 · 23/07/2023 00:50

As a young woman she was quite pretty, I think, although portrait artists did often exaggerate the looks of their subjects.

After Albert died she only ever wore widow's weeds, and a severe hair style, portraits of her as a young woman show her in beautiful dresses and beautifully arranged hairstyles. She did become overweight. I don't think age was kind to her.

I loved that film Young Victoria with Emily Blunt (amazing soundtrack) and also enjoyed Victoria and Abdul with Dame Judi Dench

blahblahblah1654 · 23/07/2023 08:24

No even in her youth she wasn't pretty. Her nose and chin and face shape aren't to proportions that are conventionally attractive. It doesn't matter though. Not everyone is and her looks weren't relevant to her job.

DrSbaitso · 23/07/2023 08:38

CountingMareep · 22/07/2023 22:19

That might have explained some of HVIII’s challenges around reproduction (and why there wasn’t the same issue with illegitimate offspring).

Yes, there is a theory it may have caused a blood thinning condition.

doglover90 · 23/07/2023 08:48

It's difficult when we're judging by today's standards. I imagine most of today's female royals have Botox, fillers etc and much more advanced skincare regimes!

Intothewoodswithallthegoods · 23/07/2023 08:53

blahblahblah1654 · 23/07/2023 08:24

No even in her youth she wasn't pretty. Her nose and chin and face shape aren't to proportions that are conventionally attractive. It doesn't matter though. Not everyone is and her looks weren't relevant to her job.

This is exactly what’s interesting about the discussion though: we (as a culture) can’t accept that and we find looks extremely important to the (female) actor’s job, so we (again as a culture) would prefer to misrepresent the reality of her looks because we believe looks are of vital importance. IYSWIM.

mangochops · 23/07/2023 08:57

Its hard to judge because its well known that royal portraits back then were purposely made to look flattering. So, paintings were like the old versions of modern day filters. Photos of her show she was very plain and not attractive at all.

NobodysNose · 23/07/2023 09:02

She was young and she was Queen. That's quite enough to make you very attractive indeed.

However, I think it almost impossible to tell for sure, because so much of someone's attractiveness can come through how they move and speak, how their face comes alive in a way that pictures won't capture. How they make you feel in their presence etc.

tobee · 23/07/2023 09:04

I'm always intrigued by the hairstyles and dresses then; the hairstyles are so unflattering by modern taste, and hairstyles really heavy and bizarre shapes to our sensibilities. Presumably this is down to what was considered an aesthetic of womanhood then. Can't imagine many of them coming back into fashion. Hairstyles can change a face so much.

That portrait of her as a toddler is very off putting, no desire for children to look like children then, just a mini overdressed adult.

NobodysNose · 23/07/2023 09:04

Not everyone is and her looks weren't relevant to her job.

I don't know - I'd argue that image (which includes but is not exclusive to looks) was important and that, maybe, she was the very first monarch for whom her image was of massive importance to her success.

DinnaeFashYersel · 23/07/2023 09:06



A rare photo of her smiling and what a difference it makes

DinnaeFashYersel · 23/07/2023 09:07

DinnaeFashYersel · 23/07/2023 09:06



A rare photo of her smiling and what a difference it makes



tobee · 23/07/2023 09:07

Also fizzog one of my favourite words op, and criminally underused.

Unlike hairstyles which I used too many times in my previous post.

blahblahblah1654 · 23/07/2023 09:10

NobodysNose · 23/07/2023 09:04

Not everyone is and her looks weren't relevant to her job.

I don't know - I'd argue that image (which includes but is not exclusive to looks) was important and that, maybe, she was the very first monarch for whom her image was of massive importance to her success.

Yes I think everyone will remember what she looks like even now!

Swipe left for the next trending thread