Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Jamie Oliver and his sugar tax

151 replies

IsThat · 29/06/2023 11:22

Pub grub, school meals chef know it all!

Turns out he was wrong about replacement of sugar.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
tilestoclean · 30/06/2023 12:36

ConfusedGin · 29/06/2023 18:59

Admit that I haven't RTFT, but I have no time for JO.

He didn't advocate for artificial sweeteners no, but he did slap a big 'naughty' sign on sugary drinks whilst still putting it in his pasta sauces and homemade lemonade. And his desserts? No, they are a treat so fine. So is full fat coke to many people.

It was a stunt that was hypocritical. Don't start me on his breastfeeding campaign. Lovely that your wife had such a positive experience but stick to something you're qualified to talk about.

And on aspartame more generally...

It might be added as a possible carcinogenic to humans. This means there is limited evidence it's carcinogenic in humans, sufficient evidence in animals, OR strong evidence it has key characteristics of known carcinogens. One of the above.

If it is, it will sit alongside nickel, lead and your mobile phone. Also, aloe vera and exhaust fumes.

So much fuss is made over it, but it is a choice. Can you choose to avoid it by having natural sugars or sweeteners? Yes, although the UK market hasn't embraced Stevia recipes.

Do people choose to avoid other possible carcinogens with the same passion...?

Meanwhile, probable carcinogenics, where there is limited evidence in humans, but one of the other points (animals or characteristics) has been met. This is where your red meats, fried foods, and drinks served at over 65 degrees C sit. Also, night shifts and working as a hairdresser.

Known carcinogens include tobacco and sunbeds.

People continue to make their choices based on personal preference, risk assessments, and balance.

Finally somebody points out the actually "risk" aspartame is to us! I.e. basically none! They are saying the risk is there if an adult weighing 60kg was to drink 12-36 cans DAILY! They class using a mobile phone as a higher risk. As with most things the poison is in the dose.

Yes JO is a bit of a twit but anyone who tries to steer our woeful government into helping the obesity crisis can't be that bad can they?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page