So you'd be OK with not having any income at all to feed your children, keep a roof over their heads or have some soap? Not attending interviews or work because you'd rather be naked than buy the only clothes you could afford (and still only then if you blob the rent or gas bill in the hope that you'll have some money coming in at the end of next month) would mean getting sanctioned by UC.
Or is it more 'well, I can afford to make a ridiculous comment like this because my husband pays the mortgage and bills/I have plenty of savings and work suitable clothes in my wardrobe already, so I refuse to accept that anybody could possibly be unable to afford £350 on kitting themselves out from scratch?
There have been threads on here before when posters have absolutely laid into those who use Primark. And as I said at that point, we couldn't afford to go searching for a charity shop open after I'd finished work in order to magically happen upon a jacket, shirt, tie, shoes and trousers in a 32 extra short/size 6 men's for DP so he could arrive at an interview for a job in a professional setting not looking like he'd fallen out of a rag recycling van. His jeans were over ten years old, his t-shirts were over 8, he'd never had a job where office wear was expected. But we could go to Primark and use the money that would have gone on the gas DD to get all of those things by ten to six, ready for 7.03am when he had to catch the bus to travel to the place that actually employed him.
This year, it's not an issue. But it's taken four years to get to the point at which I can buy from wherever I want - something that would never have happened were it not for him getting that job, especially because the continued next to bugger all income we were living on (£1100 a month for two people) meant that I was genuinely threatened with not passing probation because my clothes and shoes were worn out.