Yesterday, DD asked me if she could have a sleepover at her friend's - I said yes with the caveat that she go to choir practice as usual, because it was such short notice. She was happy with this. (she would go to friend's, then choir pracitce, then back to friend's for sleepover)
Today, her friend has skived off school, and phoned DD to say that she wants to spend the day with DD, and carry on into the sleepover without DD going to choir practice.
I have told DD that she cannot spend the day with friend because friend is off school without legitimate reason, and so that means that she has basically removed herself from being allowed privileges like that.
I'm now torn as to whether to let DD go on the sleepover at all. It's not just the question: putting it in typing makes it look black-and-white - friend has been mardy about it, and is making dd feel awful that she's not to play with her during the day.
I've said that DD can play with friend after 3:30, as she would if friend had gone to school.
But I'm not sure whether I should now allow her to do the sleepover, because I think that friend is using emotional blackmail.
Friend doesn't want DD to go to choir at all, even though she knows that it's the rule I put in place for saying yes.
Another addition to the backstory, is that last time she had a sleepover at friend's, I ended up arguing with DD on friend's doorstep in front of friend's parents about the fact that she had to go to choir practice because that's what she agreed to do, and that I wasn't bargaining with her on the doorstep.
If I had proper notice about sleepovers, then I would allow DD to miss choir for that session.
(drip feed - I really don't like friend's parents, don't get on with them and don't trust them, although I know they're nice to DD)