Hmmm, Meghan is an intelligent and dynamic woman, and I'd agree with a number of these, but a few are a bit fanciful or are pushing it really...
She is empathic - I think she can be yes, but selectively, some of her (or her husbands) family might dispute this, or former friends and employees perhaps. Strategic empathy maybe - but then, that is very politician like!
She is resilient - As a PP suggested, she doesn't appear emotionally resilient - 'nobody asked if I'm ok' etc. Like many actors that have to face rejection after rejection, they are often those with thinest skin, ill-equipped for the challenges of their chosen career. More resilient than Harry though, and he may be her weak link in that regard.
She has experience of international politics - Really? A ceremonial tour or two with Harry to Commonwealth countries where political involvement or influence is actually frowned on? An early, short internship before her acting career? Unless I've missed another job.
She is adept at dealing with the media - Hmmm again. It's not gone so well so far. Lots of lawsuits yes. Lots of enemies made within the press ranks. I'm not saying she doesn't have reason to dislike the press, particularly in the UK, but a politician has to be adept at working the media, be they friendly or not. Not sure things could be classified as 'adept' so far.
But as I said in an earlier post, I don't think she, or Harry, would even consider bringing the type of public scrutiny, exposure and intrusion that a political career demands. They left for privacy, this would be the polar opposite of their stated goal.
I also don't think either would be willing to give up their British royal titles either, which they need for their commercial ventures to be financially viable, in order to support themselves. This alone would rule her out of any US political position of power.