Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What have you stopped buying due to a price increase?

952 replies

heartbroken22 · 25/06/2022 23:51

?? Don't buy as many eggs as we normally did or chicken...

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
onthefencesitter · 26/06/2022 23:19

123Callie · 26/06/2022 23:08

When pets get ill and need expensive treatments we are going to see more people choosing to put to sleep, which was happened in the past. Many vets feel this is often a more ethical choice anyway.

when i first got my pet hamster, i was told that one should always have £500 in a bank account to cover any vet costs; possible to spend over £500 on a pet hamster but it is not common. And insurance is not really worth it for a hamster as they don't usually incur such high vet costs though hundreds is not unheard of!

So far I have spent £45 on vet costs in 2 years but my hamster is a healthy boy! It therefore surprises me that so many people are now giving up insurance for pet dogs and cats. I think I would spend hundreds of pounds if it meant my hamster could live happily for an extra year or more (which is quite a long time by hamster standards); but i think given the lifespan of dogs and cats as well as the greater availability of medical treatments, having the money to spend could potentially make a huge difference in terms of lifespan. Surely if you can't afford the medical treatment for pets, it would be kinder to surrender the pet to a charity than PTS.

FatOaf · 26/06/2022 23:20

Most people practise brand loyalty.

Do they? What reason could someone have for deliberately paying more for a product that is indistinguishable from (or - in the case of pharmaceuticals like analgesics, decongestants, antihistamines - identical to) a much cheaper one?

Babyroobs · 26/06/2022 23:20

antelopevalley · 26/06/2022 23:14

Some people do put pets through unnecessary treatment.

We have no insurance for our dogs. I've already spent £150 this week at the vets and older dog needs teeth out which is going to cost over £1000. Can't let her suffer obviously, but obviously couldn't have her put to sleep either as hopefully she'll be fine once they are removed. It's our own fault for not having insurance I know.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

MsOllie · 26/06/2022 23:22

Jenasaurus · 26/06/2022 12:22

Something I could make a saving on is shampoo and conditioner.

Can anyone recommend a shampoo and conditioner thats cheap but rehydrates your hair, the one I used to use is a ridiculous price but I am wary of the other ones as I used a cheaper (£1) shampoo recently and it made my hair looked like a wizards toothbrush when it dried. I like it to look glossy and sleek. Any recommendations appreciated.

Creightons micellar conditioner is great, I've never used the shampoo but the conditioner is light and moisturising (I have curly hair)
Usually on Amazon or creightons website or in places like savers

blebbleb · 26/06/2022 23:34

Out of interest, how much does it cost everyone in petrol a month? I drive a 1.4 mini and it's gone up to about £70 a tank but that can last a month as I only have a 10 mile round commute each day and don't travel far to shops or walk.

antelopevalley · 27/06/2022 00:07

FatOaf · 26/06/2022 23:20

Most people practise brand loyalty.

Do they? What reason could someone have for deliberately paying more for a product that is indistinguishable from (or - in the case of pharmaceuticals like analgesics, decongestants, antihistamines - identical to) a much cheaper one?

Most shelters put to sleep animals that are unlikely to be adopted. An old and ill animal will be put to sleep anyway and endure the stress of being put in the shelter.

Touchmybum · 27/06/2022 00:52

LuckySantangelo35 · 26/06/2022 18:14

@Gingerkittykat

you have to appreciate a lot of people either can’t or don’t want to fork out so much on investigations and treatments for a 12 year old whose ailments are probs due to old age.

I wouldn’t.

That is so nasty and hateful!!! I would spend my last penny to ensure my furbabies were ok!!!

Touchmybum · 27/06/2022 01:00

We recently had to part with our elderly tuxedo boy and it broke all of our hearts! He was probably about 20, but we did all we could to keep him alive, even dealing with his incontinence in the last weeks of his life.

I had two cats before who lived to be 17, another was 16 and one was approaching 19.

I don't know why on earth anyone would give up on a 12 year old!!!!!!!

PIITORNS · 27/06/2022 02:54

And today's spot the journalist award appears to go to Gwyneth Rees at the Mail....

AnotherCF · 27/06/2022 03:26

I've cut down the number of days in which I shop. I find it easier to total my spending and budget by buying everything i need for the week on the weekend and avoiding the shops during the week.

SandysMam · 27/06/2022 06:55

It is lazy journalism but a thread like this is still useful, particularly if cheaper alternatives are highlighted. Maybe the journo is just struggling with the cost of living and is being resourceful 😂pretty sure they won’t be spending the DM fee on butter though!!

FourTeaFallOut · 27/06/2022 07:26

It's so lazy to get other people to write your content. I mean, you train to be a journalist and a member of the fourth estate and then you end up at the Daily Mail, earwigging on mums talking about how they'll feed their families. Tsk.

JinglingHellsBells · 27/06/2022 07:32

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

JinglingHellsBells · 27/06/2022 07:43

And...

it's not so much that it's 'lazy journalism' because journos are allowed to canvas opinions for their features.

BUT there is a place on Mumsnet for this- called Media Requests - which cost £30.

Obviously they don't want to shell out for this.

All posts/ content on Mumsnet is copyrighted to the site (they own it) but sometimes it might appear that MN don't really mind journos nicking threads, because the site gets publicity through the article (and that drives readers to Mumsnet and their adverts!)

gracedentssketty · 27/06/2022 08:23

I can’t see it on the DM - do you have a link?

Cheesecakeandwineinasuitcase · 27/06/2022 08:56

We’ve stopped eating out so much. We don’t go shopping as often. I’ve stopped buying myself new clothes unless I desperately need something. We used to go to Centreparcs every year - not anymore. We used to get Hello Fresh / Gousto boxes - we don’t get those anymore. We stopped using the bath and use the shower now. We shop around more now and if a super market pen brand is cheaper for example then we will use that.

heartbroken22 · 27/06/2022 09:06

@gracedentssketty I couldn't find it on their website but had to 'google news' daily mail and Mumsnet and found it...all out usernames and posts screenshotted www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10954195/amp/Mothers-reveal-non-essential-items-theyve-stopped-buying-cost-living-crisis.html article was basic copy and paste...not even informative...

OP posts:
JinglingHellsBells · 27/06/2022 09:09

Ah welcome back @heartbroken22 . You've found it in the Mail! 😃

gracedentssketty · 27/06/2022 09:18

Thanks for that. Rather annoying

limitedperiodonly · 27/06/2022 09:27

@JinglingHellsBells why do you think an article about ordinary people having to cut back because of the cost of living is a bad thing to go in the Daily Mail?

FourTeaFallOut · 27/06/2022 09:30

Of course it's fucking lazy. There are a myriad of reasonable ways that journalists can canvas for opinions and they all start with making yourself and your publication known to the speaker.

EinsteinaGogo · 27/06/2022 09:36

It's also crap sensationalised headline click bait journalism..

'British mums cry about wine & pine nuts as cost of living rises hit home'...

GeorgiaMcGraw · 27/06/2022 09:54

Meat, butter, and less lighting on on the house (when it was darker, earlier in the year)

Goldi321 · 27/06/2022 10:07

I’d always planned on using reusable nappies with my baby, now 4 months old. We are both good earners but cannot justify the increase in energy and fuel usage (we are on LPG gas which is extortionate already and I’m dreading the price rises this winter) when comparing the cost to Aldi nappies that are £2 odd a big bag.
We use reusable wipes as we worked out for water wipes were costing us £25 every 3 weeks(!) and we don’t have to use the tumble dryer for them.

JinglingHellsBells · 27/06/2022 10:14

limitedperiodonly · 27/06/2022 09:27

@JinglingHellsBells why do you think an article about ordinary people having to cut back because of the cost of living is a bad thing to go in the Daily Mail?

Are you Gwyneth Rees the journo, @limitedperiodonly ?

I think an article is fine.

I don't think it's fine to poach posts, pretend you are a genuine poster / or lift copy from the site by another poster, paste it, and earn money without asking permission. Because all of that is disallowed by Mumsnet.

Posts on Mumsnet are copyrighted, so the journo is breaking the law.