....plus, there have been some older transwomen who have been able to successfully claim (I believe backdated) their state pension from the age of 60, where natal females of their age would have qualified for it, but natal males had to wait until 65.
Personally, I reckon if you can self-identify as female and legally change your birth certificate accordingly, it would only make logical sense to be similarly able to identify as born 20 years earlier at the same time and bag yourself another couple of decades' backdated pension on top of the rest.
I would challenge anybody to convince me, using actual science and verifiable logic, why the former is considered reasonable and ensconced in law when the latter isn't.
For that matter, why are refugees and other immigrants wasting their time and energies and even risking their lives in fighting to be allowed to settle in the UK, when they could simply turn up, identify as 'British-born', get a 'corrected' BC and then be waved right on in to stay for life?
Please, somebody: tell me why you can re-identify and legally change one historically-recorded fact but be laughed at and turned away for others of a similar category, recorded at the same time?