@BowerOfBramble
Has anyone listened to the BBC podcast “The Coming Storm”? It’s all about how conspiracy theories about powerful people protecting paedophiles has been used in right wing politics in the US. Isn’t this basically the same thing here? I.e. isn’t Boris - a clever man despite everything - trying to imply KS is part of this conspiracy? If so it’s a lot more scary than weird.
Yes.
In summary:
The Prime Minister deliberately used a far-right conspiracy theory to smear the Leader of the Opposition knowing that there was an unpredictable mob outside parliament which shouted about those paedo conspiracy theories and others. He did this as a way to defend himself over parties held against lockdown rules in Downing Street.
**
At length:
The British Prime Minister (presumably a grown adult who has the sense to behave rationally and take responsibility for himself?) has chosen to repeat in parliament a far-right slur about his political opponent.
The PM did this knowing that for months (years?) outside the Houses of Parliament there have been protestors given to harassing and intimidating politicians and others. These protestors have previously chanted 'paedo' at their victims - along with other tropes of conspiracy theories spread widely on the internet.
One of those provenly false tropes is about Keir Starmer as DPP protecting paedophiles from prosecution. This includes a doctored video of Starmer which has been edited to the point of plain falsity.
Nevertheless Johnson knowingly referenced Savile as a way to defend himself over Downing St parties during lockdown. We know it was a deliberate decision as his close and trusted advisor Munira Mirza has publicly said she warned him against using the reference.
The BBC's Chris Mason reports that No10 is now arguing that it was fine to reference Savile because the PM has been on: "the receiving end for weeks" of allegations about parties he wasn't at..."
This after we have all seen photos of the PM at a lockdown 'work event' which we can all clearly see with our own eyes broke the rules.
So the PM dog-whistled the mob - using his priviliged position in parliament - to protect his backside over something we all know he did.
If you want to defend him then do so. But do so clear-eyed and knowing what company you are in.