DP and I have never desired marriage but I can't figure out whether it would be wiser legally, financially etc to get married. If we did wed it would be an admin choice and probably wouldn't tell anyone till a while after to avoid fuss and pressure to have a do.
Please can I lay out the situation and you wise Mumsnetters advise me what's the smarter move legally etc?
1 DC. Hoping for 1 more. We would split the parental leave again if we were lucky enough to have another. So no one is being disadvantaged earnings or pension wise for childcare.
One earns 38.5k one earns 42.5k. Split all outgoings. Higher earner pays more for holidays, treats, stuff for DC but not loads. Mortgage in joint names and the type where if 1 dies the other becomes the sole owner.
We have named one another as beneficiary on our pensions.
We both have life insurance with the other names as beneficiary.
DP has about 5k debt left from before the relationship which he's paying off on a low interest loan, 2.5 years to go.
We have 2k joint debt sitting on an interest free credit card we are chipping away at (from last parental leave and doing up some of the house). That credit card is in my name.
We are very content in our relationship. Don't desire marriage or a wedding for romantic reasons.
Are we being foolish and losing out on advantages of marriage or have we got it covered?
Thank you if you've read this far. Advice really appreciated.