@Student133
The Irish were not being transported as indentured or unfree labour in the early 19th century. This occurred in the 1600s, but was wound up by 1700 when the trans-Atlantic slave trade was structured entirely around African chattel slavery.
The Irish have every right to feel aggrieved. I am not disputing this at all.
However, questions of structural racism come down ultimately, to social mobility.
To suggest white Irish people are faced with racism in the same way as descendants of African slaves is totally ahistorical. One group is able to enter the privilege of whiteness, particularly in 'New World' contexts; the other, not. Irish migrants and their children in places like the US and Australia were - with lots of hard work - able to enter positions of political and economic influence in the 19th century. This sort of social mobility was impossible for Indigenous groups, and descendants of the trans-Atlantic slave trade.
There are documented miscegenation rules across the US and the Caribbean that explicitly prevent people with African 'blood' from entering society on equal terms with whites.
Black people in the States, and Aboriginal Australians in Australia, have been explicitly excluded from colonised spaces, polities, economic systems.
Eg: www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/06/07/when-portland-banned-blacks-oregons-shameful-history-as-an-all-white-state/
There is NO comparability for Irish migrants.
False equivalence.