But the thought of Jeremy Corbin doing it is even worse.
This encapsulates current political tactics, and is why Trump might win again.
The (highly successful) strategy of both the Trump and Johnson campaign is to spend little time talking up their own candidate, and instead concentrate their energies endlessly smearing their opponent.
The idea is to suppress the vote for opponent's vote, even if they can't swing those voters to their own candidate. How many times did you hear: "Obviously I don't approve of Trump. But Hillary... I just couldn't". Or substitute Johnson / Corbyn.
Informative article here about Republican political consultant who subsequently did the same job for Viktor Orban in Hungary:
The Unbelievable Story Of The Plot Against George Soros
www.buzzfeednews.com/article/hnsgrassegger/george-soros-conspiracy-finkelstein-birnbaum-orban-netanyahu
Finkelstein’s goal was to polarize the electorate as much as possible, to pitch each side against the other. The fuel: fear. “The danger has to be presented as coming from the Left,” a 25-year-old Finkelstein advised Nixon.
Whoever doesn’t attack first will be beaten, he argued. And Finkelstein made things personal. Every campaign needs an enemy to defeat. He developed negative campaigning into a technique he called “rejectionist voting” — to demonize the enemy so much that even the laziest of voters would want to get out and vote, just to reject them.
Finkelstein would also advise his clients not to talk about themselves, but instead to focus their campaigning on destroying their opponents. [...] Campaigners named his ideology “Finkel-Think.” It was simple but effective. Friends of Finkelstein have often claimed that nobody got more politicians elected than he did.