"The fact that goal posts keep moving"
Only by the fans who demand more evidence the scurry to try to find any wholes to pick.
"the fact the waited until they were sure they couldn’t be sued for liabel"
They couldn't be sued for libel anyway, unless Jackson was proved not to have done it. And you can't prove someone 'innocent', only 'not guilty beyond reasonable doubt'.
"the clear and obvious holes in the story"
There are no 'clear and obvious holes in the story', only 'gotchas' from fans who initially thought they had something to discredit them with, but each time e.g train station, it is cleared up and the fans are left with nothing, it wasn't the 'gotcha' they hoped for, so they move the goal posts once again and go looking for something else to discredit. But as we have seen, they've gotten no where, and more evidence is coming out in the mens' favour, such as the newsreel showing Jackson and Safechuck looking at rings - which PROVES Safechuck was telling the truth!!!
"court testimonies blow the most recent version of events out of the water"
Actually no they don't.
"other witness testimony of people who were there, etc etc."
Yes, such as people who worked for him who testified seeing Jackson naked with boys. A STRANGER on a train, who gave no name and sought no money, who reported strange noises from a private room in a carriage on a train. Etc etc etc!
"He was meant to have spent nights with 1000s of kids apparently yet only five come forward and say he abused them. If he was such a serial abuser would there be a lot more, even more so with the me too movement?"
Your argument is juvenile, simplistic and desperate. An abuser doesn't abuse every single child they come across. They invest considerable time grooming a family. That takes time. He spent many hours with and on the phone to Safechuck. In addition, 2 more have come forward since the documentary aired according to an FBI agent. Regardless of how many or how few, it does NOT mean these 2 men are lying. Or the (at least 20 by many accounts) of boys who have been paid off aren't lying.
"Tells me it’s the few who are wanting to make a quick buck and trying push the buttons of the public to gain sympathy to their financially driven cause."
No, this tells me you are desperate to move the goal posts and have an answer for and excuse for everything. If there is too few, it must mean it's not true (a counter argument can be made that considering it is not many, it is altruistic and less likely to be a 'bandwagon effect'. But if there is too many, you would argue they are ALL jumping on the bandwagon for money. They can't win with you, you have been brainwashed by Jackson and have made up your mind he was innocent so you will find ANY angle, regardless of side, to create a 'hole' to then create a narrative for which you can argue. It is strange though how you don't acknowledge the newsreel of Jackson and Safechuck looking at rings is something in his favour. You only look at (what you think are) holes, but conveniently ignore something that backs them up.
"Are you forgetting Wade Robson called himself the master of deception and was quoted that this case would make him relevant again."
Where are you getting that from? A tabloid? Many victims will say that they themselves put on a mask, are able to fool people that they are ok, despite dying inside. Master of deception would be something a victim admits they are, because they are good at hiding what they feel. It is strangely telling of the reaching required for you to see that in a negative light when it can be easily said to be a statement of fact most victims would relate to. I would really love to see this source that proves he said it would make him relevant again. If it exists.