We are going to be decorating our little boys room within the next week or so.
He's 16 months old and quite likes paw patrol. My dh thought it would be nice to give his room a theme, and said we could do it all in paw patrol (bed, toy organiser, lamp and light shade, rug, curtains, bedding, cushion. And maybe get wallpaper for the feature wall and paint the rest blue.
I suggested keeping it simpler with blue paint all round, a normal non branded or charactered toddler bed, normal blue curtains. Then maybe just mix and match the other bits bits (light shade and lamp, rug, toy storage- say paw patrol lamp and light shade, Thomas rug. And then he could have a paw patrol bedding set, as well as a different one- Thomas for example. Just so it's not all one character. He could also have plain bedding and stuff as well, doesn't all need to be a certain character).
I can understand where he's saying (I had my whole room barbie when I was a child). But my reasons for saying no are: it will be more expensive, we are living in a rented student house and don't know how many years we will actually live here- we have another year and a half so far, this may extend or may not- depending on circumstances- so is it worth spending all that extra money if we do end up moving out next year? And if we do stay, though he likes paw patrol now, in 3 or 4 years time he may not. Then what do we do if he wants his room changing?
Whereas if we keep it simpler with nice boy colours and a variety of branded things, it will be cheaper, and if we do move next year it won't be as much of a shame to leave it behind. The other thing is we have to get permission from the landlord to decorate a different colour. He's pretty relaxed and we have a good relationship with him, and he probably won't object to a nice blue colour (and not say we need to repaint- though we will if needs be), but if it's wallpapered with paw patrol, we will defiantly have to redecorate before we do move out.
Who's making the better suggestion, me or my husband? WWYD?