Yes I have heard so many stories of ‘coaching’ during labour and the pushing phase (whether to push more or push less or wait) leading to bad outcomes.
@homebirthAMA I’ve already had a second. Sadly after first birth DH was even less up for home birth. I would have insisted on a private midwife except by then his work medical insurance covered private birth.
so that was the compromise. I researched three obstetricians and met three before choosing one. She was a pro non intervention births as I could find.
but. It was a long hard road to get pregnant the second time (took IVF and there’s a five year gap between my kids).
so when it rolled around I had a baby measuring big (scans predicted over 11 pounds) and I was 40.
with those two factors the pressure to intervene was huge.
I declined early induction as I really believe the baby needs to gestate as long as it should. We agreed on C section of no labour by 40 weeks.
but that fell on a bank holiday and as it got closer she pushed and pushed to go before.
i was in pre labour all the prior week but the pressure, I feel, stopped things tipping over.
so in the end it was an elective c section she stayed late in the Friday night before the bank holiday weekend to do. She said to me during it ‘i wouldn’t want to be doing this with an anaesthetist i didn’t know’.
i have spine issues so I was grateful that all went smoothly.
through it all I feel I gained an insight into the pressures obstetricians are under.
i had warm and constructive discussions with mine. But after the last one, she sent a letter to my GP and copied me in. I read it on the way back from a massage while having contractions which then stopped as it made my blood run cold.
it was a version of the truth but more or less said I cared so much about physiological birth that was more important to me than whether my baby died. Which was upsetting and untrue.
but with my experience from work I could also see this was a letter written to cover herself, with an eye to any future court case.
in the end obstetricians are held responsible if things do go wrong and mother or baby have serious and outcomes or die.
and the choices they make are not Bly on what drives evidenced based good outcomes but by protecting themselves in a blame based legal culture.
They want to be able to say did everything to follow ‘guidelines’ (eg strongly advised intervention if a baby is measuring big) so that they are protected if there is a court case.
and then it becomes self fulfilling. Not sure my obstetrician had seen the physical ways you can release shoulder dystocia for example. As she ALWAYS advises early induction or c section for big babies.
We need to change the system they operate in to enable them to make choices that aren’t based on fear of blame.
It takes a very strong minded mother to hold out against the pressure that you are out under if you fall outside of guidelines.
i think one answer could be a team
of midwives and obstetricians trained in those methods (and up for it) as you described your home birthing midwives team to be, OP.
ive made my peace with what happened.
one thing I will say about the private system is my post natal
care was AMAZING. Three nights in a quiet private room, lovely food, midwife there within 30 seconds of calling for help. I came home feeling great.
at my six week check up my obstetrician who also works in the NHS explained in the private wing the ratio of midwives to mothers was 1:4. In the NHS it’s 1:27.
so many bad outcomes are created by a simple but appalling lack of resources.
i actually think a system when midwives come to labouring mother at home as standard and then make the decision with you on whether and when to transfer would create much better outcomes for everyone.