I could not be part of an organisation that still has the men only part of it... in this day and age I find it poor that organisations like this, that sideline women, still exist.
United Grand Lodge Of England is not a part of my organisation. There are aspects of it that I find too conservative and even regressive, such as their attitude towards women, handicapped people, and other races as well as their insistence on God. I still respect them for the work they do, on their own selves as well as for the good of their communities.
There are men-only lodges in mine, but there are also women-only and mixed ones. I don't find it a terrible thing.
OP I thank you for being so honest and also patient in your answers.
No problem. Thank you for appreciating it. I expected this AMA to be challenging and even hostile.
I suppose my view is tainted because freemasonry was such a huge part of my childhood, to the detriment of it, to be frank.
I'm sorry to hear it. Mine was influenced positively through Freemasons around me.
Many other organisations have changed because of womens equality, it's awful that Freemasonry hasn't.
It has. Only the most conservative branch has not. Unfortunately, that is what most people in the UK understand when they think of Freemasonry.
My understanding is that the number of Freemasons in the conservative branches of UK and US are much lower now than they were 50 years ago, whereas the liberal obediences around the world are steadily growing. It looks like the change will spread one way or another, even if the conservative branch does not revolutionise its views on women.