I appreciate I’m not the OP, but thought I’d give the recent questions a go.
I wonder if things have moved on a bit since your kids were placed or if there’s a national/regional difference in post adoption support? I know for us we saw a social worker (either ours or the DC social worker) initially once a week, moving to fortnightly and slowly tapering off to monthly. We stopped booking regular meetings with SW about 8 months post placement - 4 months after the adoption order was granted but can still contact the adoption team if need be.
We saw social workers about 5-6 times post placement. Their’s 2 or 3 times, ours 2 or 3 times. That was it. We’re in England.
Do you think they spend too much time and emphasis on getting them back with their birth parents? Surely after three or four children are taken away there's very little chance that things can be sorted out?
I can only speak to my children’s experience. My natural reaction is to say yes, too much time was spent before removing my children. Their child protection report is a litany of events over 2 years which any birth parent would be horrified by. Measure after measure was put in place to support birth mum but she couldn’t accept help. The report of events of concern was 20 pages long, but no single event triggered removal as it didn’t fall below the threshold... until a non accidental fracture was recorded.
However... future birth children have been removed under ‘the risk of future harm’ measure which many people disagree with. For me, birth mum has never taken any responsibility, therefore cannot change, therefore removal of children before actual harm is the right course of action. Others may disagree.
Peter...maybe that’s answers your question too?