"We" can always tell

One woman. Judged as a man because of the way she looked, is one too many.

Yes and it was a woman who was murdered. It's disgusting behaviour.

We don't know the reason(s) she was removed from the list and then added back.

We do know the reason that there was doubt - the courts and police have a history of providing inaccurate information which is then relayed by the media.

The solution is to report sex accurately.

Then so is one male crime reported as having been committed by a woman. And that's being going on for years. Any opinions on that?

Or the woman who was forced to call the man who assulted her 'she' in court and had her compensation cut when she didn't?

You seem awfully keen to exploit this poor woman rather than condemn those who have led up a situation where there must be doubt over the accuracy of reports.

Do you think they should check that the victims are women before they are put on the list?

I've said my piece. I think this whole thread and the excuses about labelling that poor woman a man is awful. Won't be replying again. You know what I think of you all.

It kinda blows my mind that anyone would have the sheer front to come on threads like this and actually try to claim the high moral ground, whilst lecturing women?

I think you are very frustrated that we aren't following the script you would like us to use.

But you have nothing to say about gender ideology which has directly led this situation by constantly misrepresenting men as women?

Removed from the "list", when we know how these kind of lists have gone in the past shows how far gone you all are. A list of the unworthy. Frightening.

?

Darling, you judge me anyway. I've seen enough of your posts in the past to know your values are not ones I respect, nor does your opinion of me matter.

I post for fairness and clarity when Gender Critical Feminism is misrepresented, not because I am concerned that people who I already know sign up to the sexist ideas of Genderism might have a poor opinion of me.

And so, I judge you.

Sorry, I don't have a clue who you are.

No worries. I recognise your username and know your views about views like mine. You don't need to recognise my name.

Is a list of women killed by men a list of the unworthy now? Because that's what you seem to be saying.

So Rhinos is excluded from the 'all' in "You know what I think of you all"?

So confusing.

Good, because I don't. But you do mine. Thanks!

You’d have been better off sticking to the ‘not replying’ line. This ^ is just nonsense.

I think it might be more frustration that not everyone is submissive and does what they are told 🤔

one of the issues we have in society at present is that people personalise everything...

they take their situation and extrapolate upwards to the general - of course individual situations are terribly sad - a child who is run over / a person who gets cancer / someone who loses their job - all terrible for the individuals and those around them - but we still need to also understand patterns at a national level - is a child being run over every day all over the country, or was it a one-off - changes traffic policy / only one person with cancer, or an increasing % nationally - changes NHS policy / just one job loss, or the start of entering a recession - might change government policy...

we can not as a society allow those who are close to someone who has suffered to effectively bully society in other areas - it is terribly sad, but we still need to understand national stats...

and when a woman is injured or killed by a man - that is a pattern we need to understand nationally - conceptually a simple statistic, made tricky by the insistance by a tiny minority that anyone can be a man or woman as they choose - this adds layers of complexity to understanding accurate stats, and it means that occasionally a mistake might be made...

the apology was issued, and details corrected, but we can't allow emotion at that one scenario to get out of hand and damage what we also need to understand nationally - and knowing these stats is important (more important would of course be to do something about it!).

So, yes it is sad for the family concerned, but it was an understandable mistake which only happened because of the cultural confusion instigated by those promote an alternative reality in which sex is changeable -so we must:

• not make these mistakes where possible (and apologise if they happen)
• continue to record violence against women
• fight back for clarity and truth around sex being natal and immutable.

Yes this is relevant. It’s part of why women ask for single sex spaces.

And there was the woman beaten up standing in the queue for the ladies because some bloke though she wasn't feminine enough to be a woman and he was 'protecting' his wife who was also in the queue.

I don’t think it was a compliment.

Could you state anything any more obvious? This idea that people need to be seen to publicly condemn every single awful thing that other people do is ridiculous. OBVIOUSLY harassing bereaved family members is wrong. The word 'harassing' is a bit of a clue.

This is a list of women killed by men.

What exactly are they 'unworthy' of?

Genuinely confused at what point it is you think you are making.