Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Why does mumsnet have a huge ad for the Labour Party?

60 replies

IwantToRetire · 10/06/2024 17:18

Why does mumsnet have a huge ad for the Labour Party?

Why does mumsnet have a huge ad for the Labour Party?
OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
IwantToRetire · 20/06/2024 16:51

Has anyone seen ads from any other political party - just out of interest - and concerns about mumsnet's reputation!

OP posts:
cavalier · 18/06/2024 19:14

He dad was a tool maker 😆
yeah we know mate

Needmoresleep · 16/06/2024 13:44

I miss the days, about two years ago, when the algorithms decided that posters on the Sex and Gender board were interested in gay cruises. Pictures of jolly boys having a lovely holiday.

ifIwerenotanandroid · 16/06/2024 13:33

IwantToRetire · 15/06/2024 23:41

Private yacht

Private yacht

Private yacht

😀Nice try! Hope it works. I haven't got my chateaux back yet.

IwantToRetire · 15/06/2024 23:41

Private yacht

Private yacht

Private yacht

OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 15/06/2024 23:39

ifIwerenotanandroid · 15/06/2024 00:55

That happens with other ads too - click slightly off the X (if it's there) & you end up on the advertiser's website. I comfort myself with the thought that MN probably gets paid for that each time it happens.

Again everyone keeps missing the point!

There is no X to close the ad

unlike every other ad that is circulated.

OP posts:
ifIwerenotanandroid · 15/06/2024 20:20

BackToLurk · 14/06/2024 16:15

The hilarious thing is, the way the algorithms work, the more you comment on this thread. The more likely you are to be served that ad.

Not in my case, thankfully. Ah, the lovely sea of boring grey...

French castles, French castles, French castles. Let's see if the algorithms pick that up. I miss the mutli-million properties I used to see all the time.

ifIwerenotanandroid · 15/06/2024 00:55

That happens with other ads too - click slightly off the X (if it's there) & you end up on the advertiser's website. I comfort myself with the thought that MN probably gets paid for that each time it happens.

IwantToRetire · 15/06/2024 00:46

I think my problem is that initially I thought it would be like other ads and I could just click in the right hand corner and get rid of it, but because it is not the same as other ads and open to comment , I got - gulp - sent to Labour Party indoctrination centre.

So now they will see that as a positive. That i want to be inundated with their two faced nonsense.

Which now I thought that makes me more incensed that MNHQ have imposed this on us, as it shows how over powering and undemocratically does not have the option to dismiss it.

I wonder how many other irate users of mumsnet have given Labour HQ a false positive, if like me they innocently thought they could get rid of the ad, but instead get sent through to Starmer's apparatchiks.

@MNHQ are you aware of this deceit.

OP posts:
Tryingtokeepgoing · 14/06/2024 16:52

BezMills · 12/06/2024 10:07

As someone who cannot find an NHS dentist for their child, the Labour promise to sort out dentistry is music to my ears. I took a look at their uncosted plan. Make dentists do out of hours emergency care in greater amount. I have no doubt that this is needed, and useful (though good luck finding the dentist hours for that).
What I need for my child, is a 100% commitment that every child will have access to an NHS dentist for routine care.

Labour's Child Health Action Plan will create the healthiest generation of children ever – The Labour Party

"Labour will eliminate dental deserts and improve children’s oral healthy by:

  • Delivering 700,000 extra urgent dental appointments per year, so more children can see a dentist when they really need to.
  • Introducing a targeted national supervised toothbrushing programme for 3-5-year-olds in our fully funded breakfast clubs."

If only they would tell us how they were going to do that...which would at least give a reason to vote for them! But, they are very light on the 'how' and how they'll fund it... It's a great aspiration though :)

Tryingtokeepgoing · 14/06/2024 16:50

I've just experienced this advert as well - truly awful. I am a classic floating voter, but this ad is intrusive and in no way makes we feel more inclined to vote for them. Its all aspiration and no detail. I was minded to just spoil my vote anyway, for the first time ever, as there is no-one who's plans resonate with what matters to me...this isn't persuading me to reconsider. Not that it would make any difference anyway - I suspect we will end up Lib Dem where I am!!

BackToLurk · 14/06/2024 16:15

The hilarious thing is, the way the algorithms work, the more you comment on this thread. The more likely you are to be served that ad.

IwantToRetire · 14/06/2024 16:06

I think I am being trolled for daring to speak out against the Red Swamp.

I seem to get it all the time now, and as said before, no option which other ads provide to dismiss it.

Luckily, although I will miss everyone on FWR, I dont have much time today to be a keyboard participant.

Just hope tomorrow they will have moved on to harrass someone else.
Angry

OP posts:
OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 12/06/2024 17:45

I posted up thread that the ads displayed come via Google and you can click on the X in the top right hand corner of the ad, and send a comment to say your dont like it, but .......

Having now been presented by the red swamp again when logging in today, and in fact it seems this ad is not via google. Or if it does, does not have the option to say you want to dismiss the ad and not see it again.

Stranger and stranger ...

OP posts:
BezMills · 12/06/2024 10:07

As someone who cannot find an NHS dentist for their child, the Labour promise to sort out dentistry is music to my ears. I took a look at their uncosted plan. Make dentists do out of hours emergency care in greater amount. I have no doubt that this is needed, and useful (though good luck finding the dentist hours for that).
What I need for my child, is a 100% commitment that every child will have access to an NHS dentist for routine care.

Labour's Child Health Action Plan will create the healthiest generation of children ever – The Labour Party

"Labour will eliminate dental deserts and improve children’s oral healthy by:

  • Delivering 700,000 extra urgent dental appointments per year, so more children can see a dentist when they really need to.
  • Introducing a targeted national supervised toothbrushing programme for 3-5-year-olds in our fully funded breakfast clubs."
borntobequiet · 12/06/2024 07:24

It’s a commercial site so hardly surprising. Labour knows it needs to boost support among women so it’s an astute choice. I imagine the team who made it don’t know much about these boards or the specific issues discussed on here.
Labour’s adverts don’t annoy me half as much as the MaxMara ones with the gormless looking, weirdly distorted models wearing horrible, ill-fitting clothes.

RayonSunrise · 12/06/2024 07:12

If you don't like the "takeover" ad format, you could write to MNHQ and ask them not to sell it. I've been disliking that format for over 10 years, maybe one day organisations will stop making money from it!

ifIwerenotanandroid · 12/06/2024 01:49

GlomOfNit · 11/06/2024 16:54

Goodness, it's just an advert! They keep MN running. Ads are on ALL our social media. I'd like to think I don't really notice them (ahem just clicked on a FB ad for Joanie dress) so why would MN be any different?

if you feel it invades your safe space on this particular board - that does sound a teeny bit like the toddler TRAs who are constantly wailing about deplatforming various people because they feel unsafe.

It's the fact of its taking over so much of the screen which I find unpleasant. Usually MN's background is a soft pale grey/blue which is restful & ignorable, & adverts appear in boxes on that background. A bright red background is very 'in your face' & it's not something I'd choose or design: can you think of any websites which use that much solid red as a background? That's my objection. If Labour want to advertise, who cares? Just keep it to the usual advert boxes.

IwantToRetire · 12/06/2024 00:14

Just being a bit nerdy, but have as suggested by post up thread and so sign of the red swamp, but I may own MNHQ an apology.

Is seems the ads at the top are via google! ie if you click on the x in the top right hand corner the ad disappears as it says adds via google, and options to comment. The ad is also repeated in a small box in the right hand column.

But as the red swamp has not come back not sure if it was via google or different as none of the ones via google are able to take over the background of the whole page.

Sort of pointless info but if anyone is interested

OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 11/06/2024 17:40

FWR is not a safe space at all, in terms of being able to avoid counterpoint. Rather the opposite, I'd say.

Yes I agree with that - but the envoloping ad gives an impression of who is hosting, not that the usual time wasters come here.

I welcome any indication that labour would not instantly dismiss our concerns about single sex spaces, female sport and dignity in medical settings.

I'll enjoy it, if I ever see an advert for that. I'll donate £50 if I do

Yes! We could start a gardening project and let Labour know we will pay for their ads on mumsnet if they would committ to support women's sex based rights!

OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 11/06/2024 17:35

if you feel it invades your safe space on this particular board - that does sound a teeny bit like the toddler TRAs who are constantly wailing about deplatforming various people because they feel unsafe.

First of all I am entitled to explain what I felt.

If you didn't experience that fine.

But because you didn't experience it means that I am a toddler.

What is fascinating is how many want to say I cant really have had the response I did.

And want to come on this thread and telll me this, whereas you would think if to them it was just an ad it wasn't worth the time responding to.

I have been on and for many years before that been a reader of FWR.

I have no memory of any ad that so envoloped the surroundings.

And in terms of quality control, would have thought MNHQ would have guidelines in terms of how an ad makes their page look.

OP posts:
BezMills · 11/06/2024 17:32

I think it's fair to have an opinion on this, given labour's poor record on FWR recently.
FWR is not a safe space at all, in terms of being able to avoid counterpoint. Rather the opposite, I'd say.

Unlike the treddits, terfblocked xitter, and various other 'safe spaces' ringfenced by whitelists and instabans, hostile posters are free to come here and repeatedly make the same facile points which have already been handily debunked dozens of times. We have MRA, TRA, Labour Activists, and so many more.

I welcome any indication that labour would not instantly dismiss our concerns about single sex spaces, female sport and dignity in medical settings.

I'll enjoy it, if I ever see an advert for that. I'll donate £50 if I do

GlomOfNit · 11/06/2024 16:54

Goodness, it's just an advert! They keep MN running. Ads are on ALL our social media. I'd like to think I don't really notice them (ahem just clicked on a FB ad for Joanie dress) so why would MN be any different?

if you feel it invades your safe space on this particular board - that does sound a teeny bit like the toddler TRAs who are constantly wailing about deplatforming various people because they feel unsafe.

BezMills · 11/06/2024 08:55

The enormous screen covering top and sides triple banner won't have come cheap!
For sure mn users are a good place to deploy advertising funds.
So, fair enough in my book. I hope to see other parties do the same... indeed I'd expect it

Swipe left for the next trending thread