Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

We come together not because we may identify as women; rather, we come together because we believe that we can only be free and live better lives with the end of capitalism, white supremacy, Western empire, and patriarchy. - Feminist Library

86 replies

IwantToRetire · 16/10/2023 18:40

We write this statement in the spirit of radical feminist collectives that have come before us such as OWAAD and the BWG, who took firm stances against apartheid and settler colonialism in South Africa and Palestine and were founded on the principle of transnational solidarity. Our solidarity is based on political and ethical principles that exceed gender. Sara Salem writes “We come together not because we may identify as women; rather, we come together because we believe that we can only be free and live better lives with the end of capitalism, white supremacy, Western empire, and patriarchy.” Transnational feminist practice requires us to analyse how people in different geographical spaces are subject to unequal power relations and ensure that every person has access to dignified life regardless of the borders that separate us.

https://feministlibrary.co.uk/statement-of-solidarity-with-palestine/

I'm posting this not to comment on the situation between Israel and Gaza (although realise some might want to) but because it seems another example of groups originally established on the basis on the oppression of women as a sex classhaving been colonised (to use their language) by women who see it as a platform to advance their personal politics.

Similar to this supposed manifesto to lobby MPs about women's rights posted here https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4900356-vawg-is-a-gendered-issue-which-is-deeply-rooted-in-societal-inequality-it-is-violence-that-is-directed-against-a-woman-because-she-is-a-woman-or-that-affects-women-disproportionately

Large gatherings like FiLia might be satisfying to attend, but if groups set up to support women are being occupied by women who dont see the oppression of women as being directly because of their sex, it means we are even further away from putting feminism into action.

ie what is the point of theory if there is no practice of it.

OP posts:
mirax · 17/10/2023 12:22

Another thought terminating cliche presents itself as a radical revolutionary movement. This kind of feminism is worse than useless - it is destructive and the kindest thought I have for the women afflicted by this kind of thinking is that they are tremendously stupid.

YetAnotherSpartacus · 17/10/2023 09:54

Does that mean that other groups set up to challenge other oppressions (class, race, etc.) must focus on feminism/women/patriarchy and ending male supremacy?

Thought not.

dwanma · 17/10/2023 09:10

They've had public money, and funding to pay workers, to look after the collection so it's not like they are doing it out of generosity with their time. The library is closed most of the time anyway and good luck getting anyone to answer if you try and contact them.

UnalterableSpaceCadet · 17/10/2023 09:06

'Feminism is like pornography - I'll know it when I see it'

I'm not seeing much of it here. They sound like a toddler that needs a nap.

dwanma · 17/10/2023 09:05

I do recognise the claims of bullying I'm afraid. I witnessed it and it was vicious and sustained. It has become a very unfriendly and cliquey place. The flip side of their constant emphasis on trans inclusive events and publications means they don't take much interest in women's day to day lives and issues, ignore or attack feminist organisations and have explicitly denied access to feminists they don't agree with.

NumberTheory · 17/10/2023 09:01

IwantToRetire · 16/10/2023 20:11

The feminist library is building something and they can define their community how they like.

The Feminist Library was created and only has the archive material it has because it was formed from and came out of the Women's Liberation Movement.

Its importance is because of that and its "assets" are the collections that women willingly gave on the basis that they were creating a shared memory and history.

The group that is now pontificating about something totally other, are just the custodians of that shared contribution.

And as some may know, the reason they got hold of this was because of extreme bullying and public humiliation of some of the older women who had kept the collection together through some really grim economic times.

And apart from that disgusting and unsisterly behaviour, they then spat in the face of those who had provided their asset ie the personal papers of women activists, who had donated them on the basis that they would only be made available to other women. And no it didn't need to be defined what a woman is, because at the time of its creation and the activism it was set up to preserve everyone knew what a woman is, because the basis of women's liberation was to organise against the sex class opprese of women by the male sex class.

This seems remarkably ignorant of the history of the library and more generally of political feminism in the UK over the last hundred+ years.

The library comes out of the women’s suffrage movement initially, not the women’s liberation movement. But it has been built on by many archives in the decades since and had several owners all with slightly different twists on why they are prepared to take on the costs of ownership. It is not a library intended only for women. It is one of the best specialist libraries in the country and a boon to researchers of any sex who are interested in the history of women’s political activity in the UK.

Politically, the women’s movement has been dominated by the left. Groups set up to improve women’s political situation, especially since WWII, have tended to be left wing, many explicitly anti-capitalist. While a lot of women who engaged with campaigns for individual rights like access to contraception, equal pay, or standing up against VAWG were not as interested in a wider political ideology, the women who did the heavy lifting and actually developed the organizations that created these campaigns often did so as part of a bigger belief that the oppression of women was just one aspect of capitalistic oppression that also oppressed the working class and ethnic minorities. Expressions of more radical and, especially, anti-capitalist feelings died down in the Blair years but come back every time there is a resurgence in the Labour Party (because it’s Labour supporters who tend to be activists in the area of women’s rights).

I’m don’t buy into the politics of that statement or the radical left nowadays (I don’t believe the ending of capitalism will significantly free women or reduce racism, for instance). But other than the intention to include information on transwomen, they are not particularly out of keeping with the history of the women’s movement in the UK. And they are, as PP said, willing to safeguard the archives, which less politically motivated groups do not seem to have been bothered about doing.

RhymesWithTangerine · 17/10/2023 08:43

‘Capitalism’ and the ‘Western Empire’…

Well, with such laser-like focus on their goals, how can they fail to make an impact?

Froodwithatowel · 17/10/2023 08:31

I can't make head nor tail of what that's supposed to mean. It's just a pile of buzzwords with punctuation.

EdithStourton · 17/10/2023 08:29

at least they are taking care of the collection
Wow. They are doing part of what they signed up to do. Fucking tremendous. When you join a body like that, you agree to uphold its aims.

Any organisation that launches into what Israel is currently doing in Gaza without condemning in clear terms the murder of over a thousand people and the nightmarish kidnap of nearly 200 others is plainly so morally bankrupt and detached from reality that it loses all credibility.

fearfuloffluff · 17/10/2023 08:15

IwantToRetire · 16/10/2023 20:11

The feminist library is building something and they can define their community how they like.

The Feminist Library was created and only has the archive material it has because it was formed from and came out of the Women's Liberation Movement.

Its importance is because of that and its "assets" are the collections that women willingly gave on the basis that they were creating a shared memory and history.

The group that is now pontificating about something totally other, are just the custodians of that shared contribution.

And as some may know, the reason they got hold of this was because of extreme bullying and public humiliation of some of the older women who had kept the collection together through some really grim economic times.

And apart from that disgusting and unsisterly behaviour, they then spat in the face of those who had provided their asset ie the personal papers of women activists, who had donated them on the basis that they would only be made available to other women. And no it didn't need to be defined what a woman is, because at the time of its creation and the activism it was set up to preserve everyone knew what a woman is, because the basis of women's liberation was to organise against the sex class opprese of women by the male sex class.

Yes, and all that material would have gone in a skip if it wasn't for the group currently running it. I know quite a lot about the FL, I used to be involved with it.

I don't recognise any claims of bullying or humiliation, there were certainly disagreements but they've been there throughout the feminist movement.

There was never any reassurance that only women would access the materials, it was always open to all when I was involved. Including trans people.

The people who are running it are actually doing something, you're just sniping on the sidelines. It's not necessarily how I'd choose to characterise a feminist group I was involved with, but at least they are taking care of the collection.

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 17/10/2023 08:10

BigSalad · 17/10/2023 03:15

Communism. Death for everyone who disagrees.

'We want to smash whatever it is.'

BigSalad · 17/10/2023 03:15

Communism. Death for everyone who disagrees.

slore · 17/10/2023 03:02

When you have a particular cause, and suddenly tack on (counts) six other causes that you demand followers must also agree with, suddenly you make your potential pool of supporters much more niche.

I am unsure of, actively disagree with, or feel attacked by, the various tenuously related woke causes they mention. A feminist library should be neutral and inoffensive to non-feminists and appealing to feminists, but they've immediately turned me off. They are making enemies of people who might otherwise be interested before they even start, because they're so insistent upon forcing their personal worldview down everyone's throats.

This is why I like Kellie Jay Keen, she's down to earth, and she just says to support other females, even the ones you don't like. Simple.

Coyoacan · 17/10/2023 03:01

It is really time that the Charities Commission wielded some power. This is happening with increasing frequency, charities not fulfilling their remit, but off on another course altogether. If people donated books to an organisation that promised to look after and use them in a certain way, it is a bit much that some fly-by-nights turn up and change the whole set-up.

Amnesty International also seems to have given up on political prisoners in a clear betrayal of the huge donations it has received over the years.

Rudderneck · 17/10/2023 01:41

There has been a weird mashing together of all causes on the left. I feel it's related in some sense to the way the newest Pride flag is supposed to stand for every group of people too. I keep thinking of sci fi stories like Invasion of the Body Snatchers, where utopian unity is achieved by removing all human differences. So no one disagrees about what they care about. We are all individuals, we are all differernt, we are Diverse" they chant in unison.

On a slightly different note, I think maybe people should give up talking about colonialism. It's become a sort of sound that just stands in for "evil" without any other reference to meaning. It's entirely possible to talk about history accuratly without it, and maybe if we did, people would have to think clearly about what they were saying.

IwantToRetire · 17/10/2023 00:24

Sorry meant to add that's what is so aggravating about this.

Apart from abusing their position as the current workers at the Feminist Library, what does it actually mean.

There seem to be too many women in senior positions in funded women's groups who are totally taken up with virtue signalling each other.

And of course the virtue signalling has FA to do with providing safe and appropriate services to women.

If they think women are so irrelevant why are they gate crashing these services.

Its grotesque - and in the long run will have a negative spiral down on the relevance of women's groups and how much trust women will put in them.

OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 17/10/2023 00:20

Small wonder these fuckwits can't work out what a woman is either.

Star
OP posts:
donquixotedelamancha · 16/10/2023 21:50

I think any group that says it 'stands with Palestine' unequivocally, with no mention of the slaughter by Hamas or sympathy for the Jewish victims, is morally bankrupt.

I don't excuse the behaviour of the Israeli government but to suggest it comes out of nowhere 'because colonialism' is moronic. This a horribly complex situation with monsters on both sides and no good options.

Small wonder these fuckwits can't work out what a woman is either.

RebelliousCow · 16/10/2023 21:41

JamSandle · 16/10/2023 20:30

I dont understand what they're saying...

They are saying they are against everything........especially the West with its liberal democracy, free speech, individual rights protected by law, and so on......They want a revolution - just because.

RebelliousCow · 16/10/2023 21:38

Borders are not just " What separate us" but also what defines us. There is no relationship; no community; no meaning; no morality; no differentiation; no equality - without boundaries.

zanahoria · 16/10/2023 21:22

" I dont understand what they're saying"

I stand with @JamSandle

IwantToRetire · 16/10/2023 20:42

It's usually the enemy within that causes the most damage.

The breakdown of trust is the start.

Then the steady mission drift - more likelihood mission hijack.

And in no time you realise all the groups that had seemed to be the foundation on which other concerns could be built, are now just quick sand.

OP posts:
Baldieheid · 16/10/2023 20:37

I hear Charlie Brown's teacher when people blether on like this. It's usually the enemy within that causes the most damage.

JamSandle · 16/10/2023 20:30

I dont understand what they're saying...

catduckgoose · 16/10/2023 20:23

The Library is trans-inclusive, welcomes visitors of any gender, does not require registration or membership, and provides an intersectional space for the exploration of feminism.

'Feminism' for men, again.

Swipe left for the next trending thread